Etznab
2021-07-29 13:46:40 UTC
The key word appears to be "experimental" and how that is used. I checked this subject and numerous sites said the vaccines were not experimental, but approved for use, etc. Other sites disagree and place the vaccines into an experimental context. For example.
The present COVID-19 vaccines violate all 10 tenets of the Nuremberg Medical Ethics Code as a guide for permitted medical experiments.
https://trialsitenews.com/the-present-covid-19-vaccines-violate-all-10-tenets-of-the-nuremberg-medical-ethics-code-as-a-guide-for-permitted-medical-experiments/
Under # 1.
"The risks and benefits of a vaccine must be explained in full. Only until such time, can we say categorically that they (the people) are truly ‘informed’ and ethically consented."
Here is the conclusion
"Conclusion
"Based on the above comments relating to the 10 points of the Nuremberg Regulations for Human Research, it is clear that this trial is continuing on an illegal basis. Subjects cannot be coerced as they are now. Although not mentioned above, it is also reasonable to state that the introduction of or threat to introduce Vaccine Passports, as well as the threat to not lift lockdowns, masking regulations, restaurant occupancy and so on, unless and until a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated (note that we do not mean “immunized”), is an example of malicious coercion! We hold that based on the tenets laid out very clearly in the Nuremberg Code that the mRNA/DNA vaccine studies must be stopped now, the investigators charged with crimes against humanity, and along with them, the government leaders held accountable especially those who have supported this experimentation."
https://trialsitenews.com/the-present-covid-19-vaccines-violate-all-10-tenets-of-the-nuremberg-medical-ethics-code-as-a-guide-for-permitted-medical-experiments/
Add to that the amount of censorship by tech companies to prevent the distribution of certain facts about the vaccines and their effects. It does not seem ethical to me. And the U.S. president saying the unvaccinated were the pandemic? Because isn't that discrimination of the worst kind? I mean associating naturally immunized individuals as a "pandemic" and / or the cause of spreading the virus? Does Biden know the integrity of all Americans immune systems? How many have had the virus already, have recovered, have antibodies or are able to fend off the virus naturally? Including children? But his slip of the tongue tried to place people into a category of "unvaccinated" and then characterized them a certain way. In some respects he looks like a Dr. Mengele, if you ask me. And they are like Dr. Mengeles who want to force vaccines on everybody. Men, women and children!
If they know about dangers from the vaccines an don't know the" longer-term" effects of the vaccines, does that classify them as "experimental"?
I see there are relevant points on both sides of the argument. BTW, have they had time to study babies, or children born to vaccinated mothers? How many year-old children were they able to look at so far? And if they make children take the vaccine, without the child's consent, Does that constitute an experiment?
The present COVID-19 vaccines violate all 10 tenets of the Nuremberg Medical Ethics Code as a guide for permitted medical experiments.
https://trialsitenews.com/the-present-covid-19-vaccines-violate-all-10-tenets-of-the-nuremberg-medical-ethics-code-as-a-guide-for-permitted-medical-experiments/
Under # 1.
"The risks and benefits of a vaccine must be explained in full. Only until such time, can we say categorically that they (the people) are truly ‘informed’ and ethically consented."
Here is the conclusion
"Conclusion
"Based on the above comments relating to the 10 points of the Nuremberg Regulations for Human Research, it is clear that this trial is continuing on an illegal basis. Subjects cannot be coerced as they are now. Although not mentioned above, it is also reasonable to state that the introduction of or threat to introduce Vaccine Passports, as well as the threat to not lift lockdowns, masking regulations, restaurant occupancy and so on, unless and until a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated (note that we do not mean “immunized”), is an example of malicious coercion! We hold that based on the tenets laid out very clearly in the Nuremberg Code that the mRNA/DNA vaccine studies must be stopped now, the investigators charged with crimes against humanity, and along with them, the government leaders held accountable especially those who have supported this experimentation."
https://trialsitenews.com/the-present-covid-19-vaccines-violate-all-10-tenets-of-the-nuremberg-medical-ethics-code-as-a-guide-for-permitted-medical-experiments/
Add to that the amount of censorship by tech companies to prevent the distribution of certain facts about the vaccines and their effects. It does not seem ethical to me. And the U.S. president saying the unvaccinated were the pandemic? Because isn't that discrimination of the worst kind? I mean associating naturally immunized individuals as a "pandemic" and / or the cause of spreading the virus? Does Biden know the integrity of all Americans immune systems? How many have had the virus already, have recovered, have antibodies or are able to fend off the virus naturally? Including children? But his slip of the tongue tried to place people into a category of "unvaccinated" and then characterized them a certain way. In some respects he looks like a Dr. Mengele, if you ask me. And they are like Dr. Mengeles who want to force vaccines on everybody. Men, women and children!
If they know about dangers from the vaccines an don't know the" longer-term" effects of the vaccines, does that classify them as "experimental"?
I see there are relevant points on both sides of the argument. BTW, have they had time to study babies, or children born to vaccinated mothers? How many year-old children were they able to look at so far? And if they make children take the vaccine, without the child's consent, Does that constitute an experiment?