Ontology

[Etznab]

Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

[Henosis Sage]

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.

can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??

Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?

Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

[fife]

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

Ha ha ha ha ha
Well, I can see you boys have been busy this past weekend playing at a.r.e's very own Cerberus.

[Henosis Sage]

Post by fife

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

Ha ha ha ha ha
Well, I can see you boys have been busy this past weekend playing at a.r.e's very own Cerberus.

I'll take that as a no then. Fine, be like that.

Maybe you don't really know how to answer the question/s, that is you don't know how to point out what is not right with eckankar (approach/method/system, etc) by using ontology or epistemology as the descriptive tools frame of reference. Cannot even give an example to show others how such an approach would help.

All you have then is telling other people to do, that they should do X but you being unable to even describe or hint at how to do X.

It's a weird way to act on a discussion forum. Its not the first time you have refused to explain , show others what you mean. Its a pattern of how you go about criticising others and putting them down and attempting to undermine their credibility in the process.

very tricky move.

But yet again you cannot / refuse to comment on your own pov about rebazar tarzs either. fine, be like that. People reading what you write now or one day, will make up their own minds about your contributions ....

[Maplin]

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

[Henosis Sage]

Post by Maplin

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

ROFL

[fife]

Post by Maplin

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

ROFL

Maplin:
:-)
Perfect distinction. very subtle.
And about the epistemologist at the bar... Yeah, true believers and their justifications get pretty wearisome, pretty quick. Especially if they go on and on. ;-)

[Maplin]

Post by fife

Post by Maplin

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

ROFL

:-)
Perfect distinction. very subtle.
And about the epistemologist at the bar... Yeah, true believers and their justifications get pretty wearisome, pretty quick. Especially if they go on and on. ;-)

My little joke wasn't even that sophisticated... just a cheap, simple
word play - "there was a pissed emologist (whatever that is)..."
I didn't know what epistemology or ontology was until it came up in this
group and I looked it up, so I have no other meaningful contributions to
make. But anyways, at least I've learned something from it

[fife]

Post by Maplin

Post by fife

Post by Maplin

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

ROFL

:-)
Perfect distinction. very subtle.
And about the epistemologist at the bar... Yeah, true believers and their justifications get pretty wearisome, pretty quick. Especially if they go on and on. ;-)

My little joke wasn't even that sophisticated... just a cheap, simple
word play - "there was a pissed emologist (whatever that is)..."
I didn't know what epistemology or ontology was until it came up in this
group and I looked it up, so I have no other meaningful contributions to
make. But anyways, at least I've learned something from it

:-)
Well played offhand then.

[Henosis Sage]

Post by fife

Post by Maplin

Post by fife

Post by Maplin

Post by Henosis Sage

Post by Etznab
Fife can explain the Eckankar ontology of fake masters, but my guess is that he won't. He'll try to have someone else do it for him. Have someone else speak for him. Kinpa.

another day passes and still fife can't offer up a few examples to describe what eckankar's ontology epistemology looks like and why he rejected it himself.
can fife say what he thinks about rebazar? is he real or fake? a fiction made up be twitchell or a genuine inner master teacher ??
Surely that's not too difficult to simple state?
Maybe it is ..... beats me why, but he is a strange fish this fife.

If you're suffering from epistemology you should see your ontologist.
There was epistomologist at the bar the other night, we had to chuck him out

ROFL

:-)
Perfect distinction. very subtle.
And about the epistemologist at the bar... Yeah, true believers and their justifications get pretty wearisome, pretty quick. Especially if they go on and on. ;-)

My little joke wasn't even that sophisticated... just a cheap, simple
word play - "there was a pissed emologist (whatever that is)..."
I didn't know what epistemology or ontology was until it came up in this
group and I looked it up, so I have no other meaningful contributions to
make. But anyways, at least I've learned something from it

:-)
Well played offhand then.

See? another says: " I didn't know what epistemology or ontology was until it came up in this group and I looked it up"

the person who says he does know what it is also has -- no other meaningful contributions to make!

So thanks for nothing :-)