Discussion:
UKRAINE AND DOUBLETHINK - George Orwell was right
(too old to reply)
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 02:16:53 UTC
Permalink
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right

From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/

...........we long ago reached the doublethink phase predicted by Orwell, where most of the population is conscious of double standards but ignores them effortlessly. A healthy person should be able to be horrified by what’s happening in Russia and also see a warning about the degradation that ensues from using “pre-emptive” force, or from trying to control discontent by erasing expressions of it. But years of relentless propaganda have trained Americans to doublethink their way out of such insights. Cornel West just laid all of this out in an interview with the New Yorker:
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?

That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote

We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.

The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.

quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984

PLUS

On the flip side, a slew of actions have been taken to crack down on “fake news” and “misinformation” in the West. The big one was the European Union banning RT and Sputnik:

Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”

Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------

New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”

The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.

-----

NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."

"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.

"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.

---

China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said

China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.

“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.

Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.

An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.

President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.

--------------------

Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO

“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.

The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.

Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”

According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”

We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”

On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.

Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.

-----

Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says

Conflict was inevitable

Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.

While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.

“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.

Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.

“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’

Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.

“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.

“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’

“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”

The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.

“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”

Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil

Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.

Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”

PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 02:38:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
another EXTRACT Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right

March 13, 2022

Moral panics erase memories. It’s their primary function. 9/11 wiped the national hard drive of everything from the third degree to My Lai to Operations Phoenix and Condor to the Church Committee to the School of the Americas to countless other shameful episodes, and the lessons learned from them. The Trump-Russia scandal blotted out Snowden, made the spooks the good guys again. 2016 rehabilitated neoconservatives, now reinvented as never-Trumpers, cleaning away the shame of Iraq, Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, etc.

The “misinformation” panic wiped out the WMD fiasco, restoring honor to credentialed press. The DNC leak erased “Collateral Murder.” After George Floyd we hated cops, after January 6th we loved them. Ukraine now is openly being sold as a blue-pill cure for everything that went wrong during the War on Terror, including the recent defeat in Afghanistan. “Realism” is in disgrace, and “leadership,” “regime change,” and the “universal appeal of freedom” are back, only this time their primary backers are the upper-class cosmopolitan Democrats who marched against the simplistic “freedom against evil” plot neoconservatives tried to sell them twenty years ago.

We’re at the end of a twenty-year cycle that has taken what was once the oppositional-skeptic portion of the American population and seen them rallied behind the people they once hated the most. This has been accomplished by keeping us in a rage that always escalates and is never watered down by contradictions, thanks to mastery of “reality control” via “an unending series of victories over your own memory.”

The relentless parade of panics listed above (just a small sample; we’ve had dozens just in the last few years) makes those victories easy, and every time we switch targets, from Russians to neo-Nazis to cops to transphobes to insurrectionists to the unvaccinated to truckers and back to Russians again, the Church of Forgetting picks up new converts.

When I first read 1984, it was difficult to imagine how Emmanuel Goldstein could be a villain for “advocating freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of thought” or for “demanding the immediate conclusion of peace with Eurasia.” Now free speech and peace advocacy are universally understood to be stalking horses for fascism. Anyone who advocates those things is a lesser or greater Goldstein, from Snowden to Jeremy Corbyn to Glenn Greenwald (just christened “right wing” by the Washington Post). Even I’ve been turned into a mini-Goldstein of sorts. Like Goldstein, every one of us is suspected of being under the protection of “foreign paymasters,” mainly for refusing to forget certain things:

The machine in which Orwell’s poor nebbishy Winston toiled worked tirelessly to create a language using terms from which “all ambiguities and shades of meaning had been purged,” paring the lexicon until a heretical thought would be “literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.”

Once Russia invaded Ukraine the cultural vocabulary was whittled to one compound thought, approximately this: Putin is the ultimate evil, we hate him, war is good, and peace undesirable, even if necessary. Social media is now packed with what Orwell called bellyfeel agreement on these points, “a blind, enthusiastic acceptance” for the escalation rhetoric coming from the likes of old neocon warriors like Anne Appelbaum and Lindsay Graham and David Frum, who’s reprising his “Axis of Evil” performance by endlessly hammering at the singular evil of Putin.

It’s all yet another expert wiping away of memories, with Liz Cheney, the daughter of Frum’s old cohort in the White House, papering over the “Freedom Fries” and “looks French” era by denouncing the “Putin wing of the GOP.”

There’s a real tragedy unfolding on the other side of the earth. I don’t want to make light of it. But another of 1984’s predictions was a future where war would become a “purely internal affair,” where even when there’s real fighting going on in a faraway land, the real target is always the domestic population, whose memories and doubts and distracting emotional attachments are the real threats and must be constantly policed. It’s all coming true, with forever war and slogans like #CloseTheSky demanding primacy in our thoughts, and we’re asked to forget as patriotic duty. It isn’t. Never give up memories, no matter how hard you’re pushed.

https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/

Matt Taibbi

Matt Taibbi, author of the New York Times bestsellers The Divide, Griftopia, and The Great Derangement, is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and winner of the 2007 National Magazine Award for Columns and Commentary. https://taibbi.substack.com/

------------

Meet the Censored: Cherie DeVille
Long before controversies in Canada and Russia saw financial services politicized, porn star Cheri Deville warned about payment processors having too much power over speech
Matt Taibbi Mar 10
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/meet-the-censored-cherie-deville?s=r

THEY seized donations to Truckers and long ago they blocked donations to wikileaks ---- now thet ban anything Russia related, next they will block you or your family unilaterally .... most recently THEY SEIZED the $7 billion of funds owned by Aghanis in thier CENTRAL BANK ..... NOW THEY have seized $700 billion of the Russian central bank ......

IS THIS REALLY THE DEMOCRATIC RULE OF LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AT WORK ????

NO IT IS STRAIGHT UP THE ABUSE OF POWER .... ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY.

Not to be confused with Absolut Vodka..... ALSO BANNED GLOBALLY NOW.

AND RUSSIAN CATS AT INTERNATIONAL CAT SHOWS .... FFS

-------------------

MATT TABBI
https://taibbi.substack.com/archive

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
It's official: Russiagate is this generation's WMD - TK News by Matt ...
23 Mar 2019 ... The Iraq war faceplant damaged the reputation of the press. Russiagate just destroyed it. Matt Taibbi. Mar 23, 2019.

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/aaugh-a-brief-list-of-official-russia
Master List Of Official Russia Claims That Proved To Be Bogus
The Director of National Intelligence releases a report, and the press rushes to kick the football again. Matt Taibbi. Mar 18, 2021.

RUSSIAGATE WAS A MASSIVE MANIPULATIVE DISINFORMOATION FRAUD ....



The RussiaGate House of Cards Finally Falls | @LevinTV - YouTube

#blazetv #marklevin #russigate ▻ Subscribe to BlazeTV YouTube! ... Senate holds a hearing on examining irregularities in the 2020 election ...
https://nypost.com/2022/02/13/eyes-turn-to-hillary-clinton-not-trump-in-the-russiagate-scandal/
Eyes turn to Hillary Clinton, not Trump in the Russiagate scandal

13 Feb 2022 ... Russiagate, the collective delusion that Donald Trump was secretly a Russian agent aided and abetted by the Kremlin, the topic of ...
https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/the-real-collusion-was-the-creation-of-russiagate-out-of-absolutely-nothing/
The real 'collusion' was the creation of 'RussiaGate' out of absolutely ...

4 Nov 2021 ... The Hillary Clinton campaign hired a bunch of shady operatives to put together a collection of lies and innuendo about Donald Trump and shop it ...
https://www.politico.eu/article/us-attorney-general-william-barr-releases-summary-of-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report/
Mueller finds no evidence of Trump-Russia conspiracy - POLITICO

24 Mar 2019 ... August 24, 2020 12:19 pm. By Nancy Cook and Meridith McGraw ... March 14, 2020 6:27 pm. By Rym Momtaz ... February 20, 2020 6:59 pm.
https://washington.mid.ru/upload/iblock/3c3/3c3d1e3b69a4c228e99bfaeb5491ecd7.pdf
THE RUSSIAGATE HYSTERIA: A CASE OF SEVERE RUSSOPHOBIA

18 Apr 2019 ... DEBUNKING KEY CLAIMS OF “RUSSIGATE”. 101. CONCLUSION ... with other “adversaries” would seek to interfere in the 2020 presidential election.
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1305571893072859136
Aaron Maté on Twitter: "@ggreenwald @theintercept Yes, but ...

Sep 14, 2020 ... thereby spreading disinformation about alleged Russian vote-hacking & feeding into even wider Russigate disinformation.

AARON MATE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Maté
Aaron Maté - Wikipedia

Aaron Maté is a Canadian journalist and a reporter for The Grayzone. He is a former producer of Democracy Now! and a contributor to The Nation and ...
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1305571893072859136
Aaron Maté on Twitter: "@ggreenwald @theintercept Yes, but ...

Sep 14, 2020. Glenn Greenwald passed on the Reality Winner leak—which was legitimately huge news—because he “considered its claims about Russian hacking ...
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate
Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) / Twitter

any update on your bold assertion, in October 2020, that the Hunter Biden laptop story ... Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, ...

Aaron Mate on New #Russiagate Bombshells, Plus More From the ...

Aaron Mate of the Grayzone and 'Pushback' joins the show to talk recent developments in #Russiagate, how it's helping Trump, plus Matt and ...
https://www.callin.com/user/aaronjmate
Aaron Maté | Callin

Aaron Maté and Katie Halper answer your questions about news of the week and our ... Trump's efforts to dispute the 2020 election — which in my opinion were ...
https://www.thenation.com/authors/aaron-mate/
Aaron Maté | The Nation

Aaron Maté is a contributor to The Nation and the host of Pushback, airing on The Grayzone. ... Impeachment Non-Bombshells Endanger Democrats in 2020.
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 02:49:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
another EXTRACT Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
March 13, 2022
Moral panics erase memories. It’s their primary function. 9/11 wiped the national hard drive of everything from the third degree to My Lai to Operations Phoenix and Condor to the Church Committee to the School of the Americas to countless other shameful episodes, and the lessons learned from them. The Trump-Russia scandal blotted out Snowden, made the spooks the good guys again. 2016 rehabilitated neoconservatives, now reinvented as never-Trumpers, cleaning away the shame of Iraq, Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, etc.
The “misinformation” panic wiped out the WMD fiasco, restoring honor to credentialed press. The DNC leak erased “Collateral Murder.” After George Floyd we hated cops, after January 6th we loved them. Ukraine now is openly being sold as a blue-pill cure for everything that went wrong during the War on Terror, including the recent defeat in Afghanistan. “Realism” is in disgrace, and “leadership,” “regime change,” and the “universal appeal of freedom” are back, only this time their primary backers are the upper-class cosmopolitan Democrats who marched against the simplistic “freedom against evil” plot neoconservatives tried to sell them twenty years ago.
We’re at the end of a twenty-year cycle that has taken what was once the oppositional-skeptic portion of the American population and seen them rallied behind the people they once hated the most. This has been accomplished by keeping us in a rage that always escalates and is never watered down by contradictions, thanks to mastery of “reality control” via “an unending series of victories over your own memory.”
The relentless parade of panics listed above (just a small sample; we’ve had dozens just in the last few years) makes those victories easy, and every time we switch targets, from Russians to neo-Nazis to cops to transphobes to insurrectionists to the unvaccinated to truckers and back to Russians again, the Church of Forgetting picks up new converts.
The machine in which Orwell’s poor nebbishy Winston toiled worked tirelessly to create a language using terms from which “all ambiguities and shades of meaning had been purged,” paring the lexicon until a heretical thought would be “literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.”
Once Russia invaded Ukraine the cultural vocabulary was whittled to one compound thought, approximately this: Putin is the ultimate evil, we hate him, war is good, and peace undesirable, even if necessary. Social media is now packed with what Orwell called bellyfeel agreement on these points, “a blind, enthusiastic acceptance” for the escalation rhetoric coming from the likes of old neocon warriors like Anne Appelbaum and Lindsay Graham and David Frum, who’s reprising his “Axis of Evil” performance by endlessly hammering at the singular evil of Putin.
It’s all yet another expert wiping away of memories, with Liz Cheney, the daughter of Frum’s old cohort in the White House, papering over the “Freedom Fries” and “looks French” era by denouncing the “Putin wing of the GOP.”
There’s a real tragedy unfolding on the other side of the earth. I don’t want to make light of it. But another of 1984’s predictions was a future where war would become a “purely internal affair,” where even when there’s real fighting going on in a faraway land, the real target is always the domestic population, whose memories and doubts and distracting emotional attachments are the real threats and must be constantly policed. It’s all coming true, with forever war and slogans like #CloseTheSky demanding primacy in our thoughts, and we’re asked to forget as patriotic duty. It isn’t. Never give up memories, no matter how hard you’re pushed.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
Matt Taibbi
Matt Taibbi, author of the New York Times bestsellers The Divide, Griftopia, and The Great Derangement, is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and winner of the 2007 National Magazine Award for Columns and Commentary. https://taibbi.substack.com/
------------
Meet the Censored: Cherie DeVille
Long before controversies in Canada and Russia saw financial services politicized, porn star Cheri Deville warned about payment processors having too much power over speech
Matt Taibbi Mar 10
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/meet-the-censored-cherie-deville?s=r
THEY seized donations to Truckers and long ago they blocked donations to wikileaks ---- now thet ban anything Russia related, next they will block you or your family unilaterally .... most recently THEY SEIZED the $7 billion of funds owned by Aghanis in thier CENTRAL BANK ..... NOW THEY have seized $700 billion of the Russian central bank ......
IS THIS REALLY THE DEMOCRATIC RULE OF LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AT WORK ????
NO IT IS STRAIGHT UP THE ABUSE OF POWER .... ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY.
Not to be confused with Absolut Vodka..... ALSO BANNED GLOBALLY NOW.
AND RUSSIAN CATS AT INTERNATIONAL CAT SHOWS .... FFS
-------------------
MATT TABBI
https://taibbi.substack.com/archive
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
It's official: Russiagate is this generation's WMD - TK News by Matt ...
23 Mar 2019 ... The Iraq war faceplant damaged the reputation of the press. Russiagate just destroyed it. Matt Taibbi. Mar 23, 2019.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/aaugh-a-brief-list-of-official-russia
Master List Of Official Russia Claims That Proved To Be Bogus
The Director of National Intelligence releases a report, and the press rushes to kick the football again. Matt Taibbi. Mar 18, 2021.
RUSSIAGATE WAS A MASSIVE MANIPULATIVE DISINFORMOATION FRAUD ....
http://youtu.be/Bqx98kQbkvo
#blazetv #marklevin #russigate ▻ Subscribe to BlazeTV YouTube! ... Senate holds a hearing on examining irregularities in the 2020 election ...
https://nypost.com/2022/02/13/eyes-turn-to-hillary-clinton-not-trump-in-the-russiagate-scandal/
Eyes turn to Hillary Clinton, not Trump in the Russiagate scandal
13 Feb 2022 ... Russiagate, the collective delusion that Donald Trump was secretly a Russian agent aided and abetted by the Kremlin, the topic of ...
https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/the-real-collusion-was-the-creation-of-russiagate-out-of-absolutely-nothing/
The real 'collusion' was the creation of 'RussiaGate' out of absolutely ...
4 Nov 2021 ... The Hillary Clinton campaign hired a bunch of shady operatives to put together a collection of lies and innuendo about Donald Trump and shop it ...
https://www.politico.eu/article/us-attorney-general-william-barr-releases-summary-of-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report/
Mueller finds no evidence of Trump-Russia conspiracy - POLITICO
24 Mar 2019 ... August 24, 2020 12:19 pm. By Nancy Cook and Meridith McGraw ... March 14, 2020 6:27 pm. By Rym Momtaz ... February 20, 2020 6:59 pm.
https://washington.mid.ru/upload/iblock/3c3/3c3d1e3b69a4c228e99bfaeb5491ecd7.pdf
THE RUSSIAGATE HYSTERIA: A CASE OF SEVERE RUSSOPHOBIA
18 Apr 2019 ... DEBUNKING KEY CLAIMS OF “RUSSIGATE”. 101. CONCLUSION ... with other “adversaries” would seek to interfere in the 2020 presidential election.
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1305571893072859136
Sep 14, 2020 ... thereby spreading disinformation about alleged Russian vote-hacking & feeding into even wider Russigate disinformation.
AARON MATE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Maté
Aaron Maté - Wikipedia
Aaron Maté is a Canadian journalist and a reporter for The Grayzone. He is a former producer of Democracy Now! and a contributor to The Nation and ...
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1305571893072859136
Sep 14, 2020. Glenn Greenwald passed on the Reality Winner leak—which was legitimately huge news—because he “considered its claims about Russian hacking ...
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate
any update on your bold assertion, in October 2020, that the Hunter Biden laptop story ... Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, ...
http://youtu.be/Pq1tzjGUgpQ
Aaron Mate on New #Russiagate Bombshells, Plus More From the ...
Aaron Mate of the Grayzone and 'Pushback' joins the show to talk recent developments in #Russiagate, how it's helping Trump, plus Matt and ...
https://www.callin.com/user/aaronjmate
Aaron Maté | Callin
Aaron Maté and Katie Halper answer your questions about news of the week and our ... Trump's efforts to dispute the 2020 election — which in my opinion were ...
https://www.thenation.com/authors/aaron-mate/
Aaron Maté | The Nation
Aaron Maté is a contributor to The Nation and the host of Pushback, airing on The Grayzone. ... Impeachment Non-Bombshells Endanger Democrats in 2020.
one comment reply to matt tabbi article .......

" I’ve spoken with the criminal Jeff Bezos, and I have been with greenie types, such as Nick Hanauer, and to be truthful, they are warped by money, by their own hubris, and they are damaging the world every nanosecond they live. [...]
So, yes, indeed,, all those corporate money men and women and lawyer class (sic) and MBA cons in our government have turned USA into a high end bribery and murder incorporated factory."

THE USA HAS ALWAYS BACKED IN FAR RIGHT CAPITALISTS, THE RIGHT WING, NEO-CONSERVATIVES EXTREME RIGHT FASCIST/NEO-NAZI/MILITARY RELIGIOUS/SAUDI KINGDOM TYPE DICTATORSHIP GOVERNMENTS SINCE THE 1800S ..... ESPECIALLY POST WW2

ONE DAY all that karma is going to catch up with america and all americans and their allies/supporters
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 03:27:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
Aaron Maté
@aaronjmate
·
27m
John Brennan & Jim Clapper signed the letter claiming that Hunter's laptop "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

Brennan & Clapper were key figures behind the pivotal Jan 2017 US intel report on Russiagate. What are the odds they got that one right?
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1504653094893891611
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 03:42:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
Aaron Maté
@aaronjmate
·
27m
John Brennan & Jim Clapper signed the letter claiming that Hunter's laptop "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."
Brennan & Clapper were key figures behind the pivotal Jan 2017 US intel report on Russiagate. What are the odds they got that one right?
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1504653094893891611
MISC THREADS ON TWITTER .....

Clint Ehrlich
@ClintEhrlich
·
Mar 17
I'm not pro-Russia. I'm pro-truth.
These days, that will get you attacked a lot.
768
Retweets
42
Quote Tweets
5,966
Likes
https://twitter.com/ClintEhrlich/status/1504296875305840647

Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
I know a lot of people think this HUNTER BIDEN' S LAPTOP is not important, but solely as a step in our progression to a system of censored news, the suppression of the laptop story was a very big deal. It’s become way TOO EASY for intelligence officials to MEDDLE in the news landscape.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1504592966421258240

Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald · 13h
The NYT Now Admits the Biden Laptop -- Falsely Called "Russian Disinformation" -- is Authentic
The media outlets which spread this lie from ex-CIA officials never retracted their pre-election falsehoods, ones used by Big Tech to censor reporting on the front-runner.

That the Biden archive revealed by the @nypost was authentic was 100% clear at the start. All metrics used to authenticate large archives - ones we used in the Snowden and Brazil investigations - proved that. But media and Big Tech were so desperate to defeat Trump, so they lied.

Any residual doubts about the authenticity of this archive -- and there should never have been any doubts -- were obliterated when POLITICO's @SchreckReports published a book in Sept. proving they were real. But media outlets and Big Tech united in a vow of silence to IGNORE IT .... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very few even included the crucial caveat that the intelligence officials themselves stressed: namely, that they had no evidence at all to corroborate this claim. Instead, as I noted last September, “virtually every media outlet — CNN, NBC News, PBS, Huffington Post, The Intercept, and too many others to count — began completely ignoring the substance of the reporting and instead spread the lie over and over that these documents were the by-product of Russian disinformation.” The Huffington Post even published a must-be-seen-to-be-believed campaign ad for Joe Biden, masquerading as “reporting,” that spread this lie that the emails were "Russian disinformation.”

This disinformation campaign about the Biden emails was then used by Big Tech to justify brute censorship of any reporting on or discussion of this story: easily the most severe case of pre-election censorship in modern American political history. Twitter locked The New York Post's Twitter account for close to two weeks due to its refusal to obey Twitter's orders to delete any reference to its reporting. The social media site also blocked any and all references to the reporting by all users; Twitter users were barred even from linking to the story in private chats with one another. Facebook, through its spokesman, the life-long DNC operative Andy Stone, announced that they would algorithmically suppress discussion of the reporting to ensure it did not spread, pending a “fact check[] by Facebook's third-party fact checking partners” which, needless to say, never came — precisely because the archive was indisputably authentic.

-----

One of the most successful disinformation campaigns in modern American electoral history occurred in the weeks prior to the 2020 presidential election. On October 14, 2020 — less than three weeks before Americans were set to vote — the nation's oldest newspaper, The New York Post, began publishing a series of reports about the business dealings of the Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, in countries in which Biden, as Vice President, wielded considerable influence (including Ukraine and China) and would again if elected president.

The backlash against this reporting was immediate and intense, leading to suppression of the story by U.S. corporate media outlets and censorship of the story by leading Silicon Valley monopolies. The disinformation campaign against this reporting was led by the CIA's all-but-official spokesperson Natasha Bertrand (then of Politico, now with CNN), whose article on October 19 appeared under this headline: “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say.”

These "former intel officials" did not actually say that the “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo." Indeed, they stressed in their letter the opposite: namely, that they had no evidence to suggest the emails were falsified or that Russia had anything to do them, but, instead, they had merely intuited this "suspicion" based on their experience:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-nyt-now-admits-the-biden-laptop?s=w

WHAT CENSORSHIP AND MANIPULATION AND FRAUD AND PROPAGANDA IN THE WEST, IN AMERCICA, BY DEMOCRATS AS WELL????? FARK ME ... WHO KNEW?

LOL

Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
13h
Virtually every media outlet — CNN, NBC, PBS, HuffPost, The Intercept, many others -- spread the CIA lie over and over that these documents were the by-product of "Russian disinformation." The Intercept even censored my reporting and analysis of the archive. Now, today, the NYT: ..... SEE ATTACHED REPORT
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1504465103093055497

Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
13h
This is a story I covered from the start because of how much corruption it revealed. The corporate press and Big Tech used a blatant CIA lie to claim an authentic archive was false. Yes, there's a war going on: there always is. But these events are vital:
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 04:17:29 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 14:42:13 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:

with Aaron Mate and Max Blumenthal
THE GRAYZONE https://thegrayzone.com/

Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
2:52
Q ..... that you make in this piece in the american conservative um and you're arguing that biden should help negotiate
2:58
a ceasefire would save countless ukrainian lives as well as lives in the dawn bass where
3:04
we saw a brutal um ballistic missile strike yesterday but his words and actions have thus far
3:10
rendered render this practically impossible gensake the press secretary was asked by a reporter
3:15
wouldn't it be better to start negotiating and de-escalating to save ukrainians instead of instilling them
3:21
with the false hope that they can win that they can actually defeat russia and flooding them
3:28
with weapons and saki said basically no we're just going to keep giving him weapons and we've destroyed the russian economy so the war continues
3:36
is peace possible and why is biden seemingly so hostile to negotiating and
3:42
de-escalating?????????

A .. Col. Doug Macgregor ... well at this point i think we have to
3:48
conclude that there is a universal opposition to any peace
3:53
arrangement that involves a recognition of any russian success
4:01
in fact if anything it looks more and more as though ukrainians are almost incidental to the
4:07
operation in the sense that they are there to impale themselves on the russian army
4:13
and die in great numbers because the real goal of this entire thing is the
4:19
destruction of the russian state and vladimir putin and no one is prepared to stop
4:26
anything as long as there is the slightest hope that something terrible will happen to
4:32
russia and to putin of course i don't see much evidence that that's going to be the case
4:37
but it doesn't really matter here everyone has universally signed on for
4:42
the russian hate campaign or hatred for russia campaign and that seems to
4:50
go on regardless of what is reported and frankly the absence of much truth and reporting
4:57
and a lot of wishful thinking in its place is hard to overestimate or exaggerate it's terrible




haha .. want more????


8:40
Q ....................... in the in the east there's a rapid advance not only of russian forces but
8:45
forces from lugon skin donetsk who are uh technically according to the u.s
8:51
ukrainian and you can see pockets there which i would call cauldrons um you know
8:56
can you can you give us an assessment based on what you see of this map uh as of march 14th ??????

A - Col. Doug Macgregor
9:02
well on the south eastern side towards the bottom you have as many as 60 000 ukrainian troops that
9:09
are completely surrounded in what the russians are referring to as a cauldron uh
9:15
that's been going on for several days now no one knows what the status of those forces
9:20
is they're probably running out of water supplies ammunition the russians would prefer that they
9:27
surrender some have but there may be pressure now to end this
9:33
which would result in the mass slaughter of some 60 000 troops and i don't think the russians are
9:39
interested in that i think what the russians are interested in is what you see they've gone to the large population
9:44
centers they've tried to avoid the center the central portion of ukraine because
9:49
that's the agricultural area in fact russian troops have been told to stay out of the fields
9:55
the russians realize that we're on the verge of spring planting in ukraine they're not interested in destroying the
10:01
wheat and barley crops at all they would prefer to see that go ahead so the issue for the russians right now
10:07
is that everything worth controlling is controlled

this notion that you hear over and over
10:13
and over again on television well there they haven't increased their territorial control they're not interested in territory the entire operation from day
10:20
one was focused on the destruction of ukrainian forces that's largely complete with the
10:25
exception of those that are still surrounded they've got a huge problem in mariupol which is off to the right
10:32
where you have roughly 3 000 of these FANATICAL fighters in the AZOV regiment or battalion (NEONAZI MILITIA) whatever you want to call
10:37
it who are REFUSING to allow any of the CIVILIANS in the city TO LEAVE in fact i saw FOOTAGE this morning of
10:45
these ukrainian azov troops telling the population there you can't leave even
10:50
though the russians had opened a corridor for humanitarian assistance and evacuation
10:56
again these things are not reported in the west because it tends to damage the narrative

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

.................. but as long as zelinski stalls the more ukrainian forces will be killed and it
11:23
doesn't make any difference how much we try to ship into ukraine they can't assimilate it and use it effectively in
11:29
any case at this point but again this satisfies the narrative that the russians are losing
11:35
putin is evil and must be driven out and he's the aggressor all of the INFORMATION going back to
11:41
2014 and earlier is essentially DELETED from the DISCUSSION - the fact that they've lost 14,000
11:47
people killed in the war since 2014 [80% DONBASS CIVILIANS ATTACKED BY UKRAINE/NEONAZI MILITARY that the ukrainians have waged relentlessly against the DONBASS [ukrainian]-russians in the
11:53
east that's IGNORED so i it's it's very tragic
11:58
but i think what will happen is the TRUTH WILL OUT eventually this will end
12:03
the russians will be SUCCESSFUL in what they've set out to do and the ukrainians will be DESTROYED /

[ OUCH! ]
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 04:22:40 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 15:17:30 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:

YT COMMENT:
If you follow their logic, they are trying to normalize hate groups. It's a new strategy. Those in power have been wanting us to hate each other and divide all along. If they show us that hate groups are supported, they're hoping we will all act out our hate toward other groups. That's why it's so IMPORTANT what you're doing, Russell, by keeping lines of communication open and questioning every time something seems off. It IS off. The tactics they're using are getting more and more extreme, and we have to keep pointing them out.


Russell Brand
5.27M subscribers
As Facebook changes its policy to allow praise for Ukrainian neo-Nazis, is this a further example of the double standards of censorship as well as our collective short memories?


Tucker Carlson clashes with Rep. Salazar over Russia-Ukraine war and borders
1,920,042 views
Premiered on 17 Mar 2022


AS I HAVE SAID RIGHT WING FASCISTS IN THE USA ... DEMS & REPUBS .... AND THE MEDIA .... ARE WARMONGERS PUSHING FOR WAR WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA .... NO MATTER WHAT

AMERICA IS BROKEN .... AND IT WASN'T TRUMP WHO DID THAT ... HE & HIS BACKERS/SUPPORTERS JUST TOOK ADVANTAGE OF IT
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 05:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
with Aaron Mate and Max Blumenthal
THE GRAYZONE https://thegrayzone.com/
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
2:52
Q ..... that you make in this piece in the american conservative um and you're arguing that biden should help negotiate
2:58
a ceasefire would save countless ukrainian lives as well as lives in the dawn bass where
3:04
we saw a brutal um ballistic missile strike yesterday but his words and actions have thus far
3:10
rendered render this practically impossible gensake the press secretary was asked by a reporter
3:15
wouldn't it be better to start negotiating and de-escalating to save ukrainians instead of instilling them
3:21
with the false hope that they can win that they can actually defeat russia and flooding them
3:28
with weapons and saki said basically no we're just going to keep giving him weapons and we've destroyed the russian economy so the war continues
3:36
is peace possible and why is biden seemingly so hostile to negotiating and
3:42
de-escalating?????????
A .. Col. Doug Macgregor ... well at this point i think we have to
3:48
conclude that there is a universal opposition to any peace
3:53
arrangement that involves a recognition of any russian success
4:01
in fact if anything it looks more and more as though ukrainians are almost incidental to the
4:07
operation in the sense that they are there to impale themselves on the russian army
4:13
and die in great numbers because the real goal of this entire thing is the
4:19
destruction of the russian state and vladimir putin and no one is prepared to stop
4:26
anything as long as there is the slightest hope that something terrible will happen to
4:32
russia and to putin of course i don't see much evidence that that's going to be the case
4:37
but it doesn't really matter here everyone has universally signed on for
4:42
the russian hate campaign or hatred for russia campaign and that seems to
4:50
go on regardless of what is reported and frankly the absence of much truth and reporting
4:57
and a lot of wishful thinking in its place is hard to overestimate or exaggerate it's terrible
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
haha .. want more????
8:40
Q ....................... in the in the east there's a rapid advance not only of russian forces but
8:45
forces from lugon skin donetsk who are uh technically according to the u.s
8:51
ukrainian and you can see pockets there which i would call cauldrons um you know
8:56
can you can you give us an assessment based on what you see of this map uh as of march 14th ??????
THIS PART IS TOP SHELF

A - Col. Doug Macgregor
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

................. the department of defense at least on
20:52
the uniform side is dominated by people uh who for the most part
20:57
don't want to have to fight a real war against a real enemy that can fight back they know that WE' RE NOT PREPARED FOR
21:04
that they know that our forces are WOEFULLY unprepared untrained and
21:09
ill-equipped they know this because they've had a hand in creating THE MESS that we have
21:14
today inside the department of defense so someone like general mark milley will advise under no circumstances provoke
21:21
the russians under no circumstances drag us into this WE' RE NOT READY


21:27
that much is clear the problem is there are other HOT HEADS and and i
21:32
think it's a mistake to talk exclusively about the administration i think we need to understand that this really is the
21:37
UNIPARTY democrat versus republican labels are IRRELEVANT they're all responding to the
21:44
same collection of donors THE DONORS WANT CONFLICT the donors enjoy conflict
21:50
enrich themselves as a result of conflict and the donors grossly UNDERESTIMATE THE DANGERS because the
21:55
donors have no real experience on the ground in the military they don't know what they're dealing with


i read a number of reports
22:02
that were given by former soldiers in the united states army special operations forces and
22:08
marines who have since BEEN TO UKRAINE and come back and they recorded with
22:13
HORROR what it was like to fight against the RUSSIANS and said don't come over here if you do you're
22:19
going to get killed this is A REAL ARMY this is real high intensity conventional
22:24
warfare forget it our experience is irrelevant and they're right


22:30
uh people that were able to essentially do whatever they want because WE DOMINATE PEOPLE in iraq and
22:35
afghanistan with overwhelming firepower people that had NO ARMIES NO AIR FORCES NO AIR DEFENSES
22:43
they they know that this will not work problem is that that's irrelevant to the
22:48
PEOPLE ON THE HILL they they are again PERFORMING FOR DONORS and



sadly there are people out there in the united
22:55
states i call it THE BOMBS AWAY CLUB who are always prepared TO BOMB ANYBODY
23:02
and attack anybody they think this is some manifestation of OUR GREATNESS and then you have the the preoccupation
23:09
with BULLYING EVERYONE the state department is accustomed to BULLYING OTHERS, BULLYING THEM into
23:15
acceptance of whatever policy stance WE WANT THEM TO TAKE [ EG ZELENSKY IN UKRAINE -- AND UNKRAINE IN 2014 COUP ]
i think that's GOING TO END AS A RESULT OF THIS CONFLICT


because over time many of the EUROPENS HAVE NOW REALIZED
23:26
what the indians the chinese most asians have figured out most of africa and latin america THAT WE ARE BULLIES
23:34
that we inevitably end up in a position where if you don't agree with us WE BRAND YOU AS THE ENEMY
And we try to PUNISH YOU with CONTROL of our FINANCIAL SYSTEM i think that's GOING TO END



23:46
uh i don't see this ending badly necessarily for russia -- russia's going to be hurt any time you
23:52
fight any war you were hurt look at us during the second world war how long did it take us to recover from that war and
23:58
it was not easy but the point is they will come out of it and THE CHINESE
24:03
thanks to JAKE SULLIVAN [ HRC DEMOCRAT SHILL] who met with the foreign minister in ROME have have seen the wisdom of reaffirming
24:09
THEIR SUPPORT FOR RUSSIA now because he went in and essentially THREATENED THE CHINESE we're our instantaneous response
24:17
to anyone who doesn't agree is TO THREATEN



we don't practice something the british
24:23
empire used to practice at least until world war one which was economy of enemies
24:29
we go in and say you're with us or you're against us whereas the british usually went into some place and said well who can we work
24:35
with and who is neutral and who can we bring on side and who can who is the real
24:40
problem perhaps we can isolate that individual or those people we don't think in those terms
24:46
and this is PART OF THE MORAL HYPOCRISY OF AMERICA but it comes with the GLOBALIST marxist[/NEOCON/FASCIST]
24:51
ELITIST [ EXCEPTIONALISM ] MENTALITY we have a MONOPOLY - they think - on
24:58
on WISDOM MORALITY DECENCY and anyone who opposes them is of course the OPPOSITE opposite ..........

[ ... AKA DELUSIONAL PARANOID NARCISSISTIC GRANDIOSE ARROGANT TWATS ]
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 06:26:07 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 16:19:36 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:


FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????

A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility

we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way

Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????

A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....

29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...

i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went

but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs


30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.

Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"

and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????

A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE

34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................

there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that


NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????

A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned

now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......

again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal

LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......

Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 06:39:19 UTC
Permalink
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
❝I have a dream. These words are known to each of you today, I can say I have a need. I need to protect our sky. I need your decision. Your help…Ukraine is grateful to the United States for its overwhelming support…However, I call on you to do more.❞ – @ZelenskyyUa
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793

First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368

AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 11:55:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793
First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368
AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
INSIGHTS BY THE BUCKET LOAD .... WILL BE INTERESTING TO LOOK BACK IN YEAR OR SO AND SEE HOW INSIGHTFUL THEY REALLY ARE ..... MAKES SENSE TO ME .... BUT WHO KNOWS?

PUTIN ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS ... late 2021/2022
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

41:26
Q -
what you think of of how biden responded and also putin's decision to invade do you think that he had other options and
41:32
strategically from a russian point of view was this strategically the right move or do you think there was possibly more
41:38
room for diplomacy not only on uh nato and missiles but also on the status of the donbas and the war there?????

41:46
A-
well i think uh the one voice of reason in the biden administration is the cia director uh or
41:53
the national intelligence director and that is william burns uh
41:58
he has always been a voice of reason on the subject of russia and he has tried to
42:04
what's the right word MODULATE RUSSIAN HATE [IN US ADMINISTRATIONS/DEPTS/CONGRESS ]
42:10
that is so prevalent but again he's being crushed by those who see
42:15
russia as something that has to be DENATIONALIZED much as the LEFT is denationalizing the united states
42:21
as a place whose borders have to be opened to allow mass migration from the developing world into russia
42:27
all of these things are part and parcel of the reasons people HATE RUSSIA [STRONG NATION IDENTITY] and of course
42:32
russia declares itself to be a an ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN country that's completely unacceptable because [LEFTIE] ATHEISM
42:38
NIHILISM MULTICULTURALISM [ JEWISH STYLED IDEOLOGY = MOST JEWS ARE ACTUALLY ATHEISTS YOU KNOW ] all of these things are are caught up
42:43
together [IN LEFTIST / SOCIALIST / LGBTIQ AGENDAS IDENTITY POLITICS ETC ] and there is a vile hatred for anybody who thinks
42:49
the kinds of things that EXIST IN RUSSIA could be remotely positive in any way
42:55
william burns has tried to push back against that he's tried to reason with people about it it hasn't worked very
43:00
well but i think there was a chance for a short time
[ IOW DIFFERENT CULTURAL VALUES EXIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES ... AND THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED NOT HATED LIKE THE EXTREME LIBERAL WEST HATES RUSSIA N CHINA AND OTHER ASIAN / AFRICAN NATIONS - IT IS PATHOLOGICAL ITS SICK SHIT INTOLERANCE --- OTHER COUNTRIES N PEOPLE HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS TOO - USA UK EU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY ARE -- THEY DO !!!!! ]

NOW PUTIN from where he sits looks at what's
43:07
going on he's aware of the things that we're discussing but he ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in
43:13
EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS at
43:18
luhansk and donetsk and i think he was persuaded that this would happen and that obviously the
43:26
donetsk and luhansk republics and their population WOULD BE DESTROYED and he could NOT SIT BY and tolerate that i
43:33
also think he thought that there WAS NO HOPE that every time he tried to make the case which he did several times
43:39
no one WOULD LISTEN TO HIM ...

.. somebody said well the reason this didn't happen under donald trump was that donald trump is
43:45
strong and no one would challenge him it had a LOT LESS to do with that than
43:51
trump's private willingness to listen to mr putin's position -- what disappointed putin and i think
43:57
many others was donald trump's INABILITY TO GET CONTROL of his own ADMINISTRATION he appointed people that were absolutely
44:04
OPPOSED TO HIM AND HIS THINKING so from the moment he opened his mouth and said why can't we have a better relationship
44:09
with russia he was SABOTAGED AND SUBVERTED [ BY THE DEEP STATE OPERATORS ] PUTIN realized that then i think he waited to see how biden
44:16
would respond and of course you know that BIDEN WAS BRAGGING about how he told putin that he was a VICIOUS KILLER AND A THUG
44;22
how proud he was of INSULTING THE MAN TO HIS FACE and denigrating him and and what he's done inside russia
44:31
i think you put that together with the build-up in the east and i think he felt russia was genuinely
44:36
genuinely THREATENED and he thought it was only a matter of time until something akin to the pershing two
44:41
missiles that we once had on the ground in germany would SHOW UP IN EASTERN UKRAINE ......

and we can all sit here and say oh well
44:48
that wouldn't have happened but he had a lot of reason to believe that IT WOULD for the reasons we've already discussed the nato-ization of
44:54
things and that's the kind that remember the pershing 2 was a HYPERSONIC missile
45:00
you know you're talking a few minutes and it lands in moscow and he kept telling people this NO ONE WOULD LISTEN
45:06
and there was no willingness to to REASSURE HIM and his government in any way shape or form that this was not the
45:11
intention

so i think he RIGHTLY CONCLUDED he didn't have much choice and i think the biggest mistake that
45:17
he's made if he's made any with this operation so i think PUTIN' S TRIED TO BE TOO CAREFUL
45:23
and i think it's tragic but when you when you do what he's done with his force you try very hard to avoid
45:30
unnecessary civilian casualties and avoid damage you end up in the position --- he's in this thing has lasted three
45:36
weeks longer than than he would have liked it creates opportunities for your enemies
45:42
for your opponents to to meddle in in what's happening it gives false hope to
45:47
people on the other side that's the problem and that's what he's up against and i'm sure he's heard that
45:53
from his inner circle i'm sure some of his senior officers have said that ....

AND IF you try to convince anybody in
45:59
the united states by the way that vladimir putin was remotely concerned about the loss of civilian life in
46:04
ukraine well they'll LAUGH YOU OFF THE STAGE " that's impossible he's evil he's terrible he's bad " it's a lot of nonsense
46:10
he was and he still is .......

i think i think he would like to get an AGREEMENT because i don't think he wants
46:16
anything to do with going into kiev yeah that's the last option i mean if
46:21
you look at it right now karkiv and kiev are about it the cauldron [ IE IN SOUTH EAST 60K TROOPS CAUGHT ] it has to be dealt with and
46:28
they're still laying siege to mariUPOL but i'm afraid given the enemy that they have cornered there the 3 000 AZOV
46:35
members they're probably going to reduce it and be done with it but that's clearly not what he wants in KARKIV
46:41
that's clearly not what he wants in KIEV but if he can't get somebody to put their name on the agreement and
46:46
agree to those basic terms then i suppose HE'S GOING TO ACT ....


46:51
Q --
well has attacked kharkiv i mean there were a billion buildings hit there yeah the question is whether they will uh
46:58
actually go in and the in the way they treat it the way they did grozny for example??????

A --
47:04
yes i think you're right max and that's the point aaron if you go back to world war ii one of the first things that all
47:11
sides learned in the war was that you don't win a city by going room to room and building the building to flush out
47:17
your enemy doesn't work you bring up artillery you lower the guns and direct fire and you bring down
47:24
city blocks that's what happened in warsaw it happened in stalingrad it happened
47:29
all over europe all during the war when we went into manila we did exactly the same thing it was ferocious nobody wants
47:36
to do that it is the worst possible outcome

and that's why for instance as i was
47:41
telling you earlier i looked at some film footage this morning that came from poland that was
47:46
transmitted into poland from ukraine showing ukrainian citizens that had showed up at a exit point from maripol
47:54
poll where the russians said come out we have humanitarian assistance in other words food and medicines and so forth
48:01
and you will be protected and sure enough there was the AZOV battalion you're not leaving you're not going
48:07
anywhere and the people of course were destraught but that's where we are

THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SHIT .... AND BEHIND IT ALL ARE THE CRAZIES IN THE USA UK AND CONGRESS AND THE EU ...FUCKING CRAZIES THOSE EVIL FARKING CUNTS ARE EVERYWHERE ....
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 12:04:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793
First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368
AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
INSIGHTS BY THE BUCKET LOAD .... WILL BE INTERESTING TO LOOK BACK IN YEAR OR SO AND SEE HOW INSIGHTFUL THEY REALLY ARE ..... MAKES SENSE TO ME .... BUT WHO KNOWS?
PUTIN ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS ... late 2021/2022
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
41:26
Q -
what you think of of how biden responded and also putin's decision to invade do you think that he had other options and
41:32
strategically from a russian point of view was this strategically the right move or do you think there was possibly more
41:38
room for diplomacy not only on uh nato and missiles but also on the status of the donbas and the war there?????
41:46
A-
well i think uh the one voice of reason in the biden administration is the cia director uh or
41:53
the national intelligence director and that is william burns uh
41:58
he has always been a voice of reason on the subject of russia and he has tried to
42:04
what's the right word MODULATE RUSSIAN HATE [IN US ADMINISTRATIONS/DEPTS/CONGRESS ]
42:10
that is so prevalent but again he's being crushed by those who see
42:15
russia as something that has to be DENATIONALIZED much as the LEFT is denationalizing the united states
42:21
as a place whose borders have to be opened to allow mass migration from the developing world into russia
42:27
all of these things are part and parcel of the reasons people HATE RUSSIA [STRONG NATION IDENTITY] and of course
42:32
russia declares itself to be a an ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN country that's completely unacceptable because [LEFTIE] ATHEISM
42:38
NIHILISM MULTICULTURALISM [ JEWISH STYLED IDEOLOGY = MOST JEWS ARE ACTUALLY ATHEISTS YOU KNOW ] all of these things are are caught up
42:43
together [IN LEFTIST / SOCIALIST / LGBTIQ AGENDAS IDENTITY POLITICS ETC ] and there is a vile hatred for anybody who thinks
42:49
the kinds of things that EXIST IN RUSSIA could be remotely positive in any way
42:55
william burns has tried to push back against that he's tried to reason with people about it it hasn't worked very
43:00
well but i think there was a chance for a short time
[ IOW DIFFERENT CULTURAL VALUES EXIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES ... AND THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED NOT HATED LIKE THE EXTREME LIBERAL WEST HATES RUSSIA N CHINA AND OTHER ASIAN / AFRICAN NATIONS - IT IS PATHOLOGICAL ITS SICK SHIT INTOLERANCE --- OTHER COUNTRIES N PEOPLE HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS TOO - USA UK EU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY ARE -- THEY DO !!!!! ]
NOW PUTIN from where he sits looks at what's
43:07
going on he's aware of the things that we're discussing but he ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in
43:13
EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS at
43:18
luhansk and donetsk and i think he was persuaded that this would happen and that obviously the
43:26
donetsk and luhansk republics and their population WOULD BE DESTROYED and he could NOT SIT BY and tolerate that i
43:33
also think he thought that there WAS NO HOPE that every time he tried to make the case which he did several times
43:39
no one WOULD LISTEN TO HIM ...
.. somebody said well the reason this didn't happen under donald trump was that donald trump is
43:45
strong and no one would challenge him it had a LOT LESS to do with that than
43:51
trump's private willingness to listen to mr putin's position -- what disappointed putin and i think
43:57
many others was donald trump's INABILITY TO GET CONTROL of his own ADMINISTRATION he appointed people that were absolutely
44:04
OPPOSED TO HIM AND HIS THINKING so from the moment he opened his mouth and said why can't we have a better relationship
44:09
with russia he was SABOTAGED AND SUBVERTED [ BY THE DEEP STATE OPERATORS ] PUTIN realized that then i think he waited to see how biden
44:16
would respond and of course you know that BIDEN WAS BRAGGING about how he told putin that he was a VICIOUS KILLER AND A THUG
44;22
how proud he was of INSULTING THE MAN TO HIS FACE and denigrating him and and what he's done inside russia
44:31
i think you put that together with the build-up in the east and i think he felt russia was genuinely
44:36
genuinely THREATENED and he thought it was only a matter of time until something akin to the pershing two
44:41
missiles that we once had on the ground in germany would SHOW UP IN EASTERN UKRAINE ......
and we can all sit here and say oh well
44:48
that wouldn't have happened but he had a lot of reason to believe that IT WOULD for the reasons we've already discussed the nato-ization of
44:54
things and that's the kind that remember the pershing 2 was a HYPERSONIC missile
45:00
you know you're talking a few minutes and it lands in moscow and he kept telling people this NO ONE WOULD LISTEN
45:06
and there was no willingness to to REASSURE HIM and his government in any way shape or form that this was not the
45:11
intention
so i think he RIGHTLY CONCLUDED he didn't have much choice and i think the biggest mistake that
45:17
he's made if he's made any with this operation so i think PUTIN' S TRIED TO BE TOO CAREFUL
45:23
and i think it's tragic but when you when you do what he's done with his force you try very hard to avoid
45:30
unnecessary civilian casualties and avoid damage you end up in the position --- he's in this thing has lasted three
45:36
weeks longer than than he would have liked it creates opportunities for your enemies
45:42
for your opponents to to meddle in in what's happening it gives false hope to
45:47
people on the other side that's the problem and that's what he's up against and i'm sure he's heard that
45:53
from his inner circle i'm sure some of his senior officers have said that ....
AND IF you try to convince anybody in
45:59
the united states by the way that vladimir putin was remotely concerned about the loss of civilian life in
46:04
ukraine well they'll LAUGH YOU OFF THE STAGE " that's impossible he's evil he's terrible he's bad " it's a lot of nonsense
46:10
he was and he still is .......
i think i think he would like to get an AGREEMENT because i don't think he wants
46:16
anything to do with going into kiev yeah that's the last option i mean if
46:21
you look at it right now karkiv and kiev are about it the cauldron [ IE IN SOUTH EAST 60K TROOPS CAUGHT ] it has to be dealt with and
46:28
they're still laying siege to mariUPOL but i'm afraid given the enemy that they have cornered there the 3 000 AZOV
46:35
members they're probably going to reduce it and be done with it but that's clearly not what he wants in KARKIV
46:41
that's clearly not what he wants in KIEV but if he can't get somebody to put their name on the agreement and
46:46
agree to those basic terms then i suppose HE'S GOING TO ACT ....
46:51
Q --
well has attacked kharkiv i mean there were a billion buildings hit there yeah the question is whether they will uh
46:58
actually go in and the in the way they treat it the way they did grozny for example??????
A --
47:04
yes i think you're right max and that's the point aaron if you go back to world war ii one of the first things that all
47:11
sides learned in the war was that you don't win a city by going room to room and building the building to flush out
47:17
your enemy doesn't work you bring up artillery you lower the guns and direct fire and you bring down
47:24
city blocks that's what happened in warsaw it happened in stalingrad it happened
47:29
all over europe all during the war when we went into manila we did exactly the same thing it was ferocious nobody wants
47:36
to do that it is the worst possible outcome
and that's why for instance as i was
47:41
telling you earlier i looked at some film footage this morning that came from poland that was
47:46
transmitted into poland from ukraine showing ukrainian citizens that had showed up at a exit point from maripol
47:54
poll where the russians said come out we have humanitarian assistance in other words food and medicines and so forth
48:01
and you will be protected and sure enough there was the AZOV battalion you're not leaving you're not going
48:07
anywhere and the people of course were destraught but that's where we are
THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SHIT .... AND BEHIND IT ALL ARE THE CRAZIES IN THE USA UK AND CONGRESS AND THE EU ...FUCKING CRAZIES THOSE EVIL FARKING CUNTS ARE EVERYWHERE ....
48:12
yeah we're seeing a lot of these sort of incidents at checkpoints of motorists
48:18
being shot particularly men there may have been even some uh western journalists or a journalist
48:25
who was shot at one of these checkpoints uh still looking into that but that narrative obviously isn't
48:32
getting out


48:56
table because there have really been no negotiations for the last year that have had any effect at all so now we're
49:02
starting to see some movement i think vladimir zelinski has said publicly that ukraine does not wish to join
49:10
nato i guess my my question is do you think i mean you have sources
49:17
all around the region do you think zielenski even has the ability to negotiate given the different forces in
49:25
ukrainian politics the hardline forces the u.s um and how do you see the negotiations
49:32
shaping up when the u.s is so at least at this point when the biden administration is so hostile and
49:38
determined to escalate ................... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LISTEN ...... HIS CLOSING ADVICES INSIGHT


well let's be frank because zielinski right now has better press than mother
49:44
teresa uh so he's reluctant to give that up
49:50
and he's become a rock star to the west pretending to be a lot of things that
49:56
he's not but it's worked very well for him he has always been in danger of some of
50:02
the hardliners the radicals that control frankly the uh sbu the
50:08
equivalent of the secret police inside ukraine as well as the military
50:14
of being assassinated himself if he's if he went too far
50:19
i don't know if that's still the case i'm sure there's some some truth to that but i really think
50:24
that uh the cards are in the hands of uh washington and in the hands of president biden and
50:30
president biden is in a position that's not very different since aaron mate is interested in vietnam
50:36
uh not very different from lyndon johnson in this sense lyndon johnson wanted to end the war in
50:42
vietnam in fact there's a lot of evidence that he didn't want to go there at all but it didn't make any difference
50:47
because he was afraid that if he didn't do those things that he would be outed as soft on communism and a friend of the
50:54
reds and so forth and so johnson found it impossible to simply cut his losses
51:00
and get out which was the right thing to do in 1968-69 all the generals privately said this is
51:06
a waste of time we're not going to win it let's go he didn't do it and obviously he didn't run for
51:12
re-election i think biden's in a similar position right now if he if he he's got the he's got the
51:19
uniparty out there depicting him as feckless weak incompetent incapable
51:25
if he were to simply say all right mr z the show's over
51:30
sign on the dotted line we'll back you we'll help you rebuild et etc et cetera
51:36
uh i i think he can't do that i think he should but i don't think he can and i
51:41
think every time he's inclined in that direction he's warned by the people around him of the dangers associated
51:47
with that now there's political dangers yeah but there are a couple of things that are also happening the assumption
51:53
is well if we just keep the russians in the field long enough their army will collapse well there's no evidence for
51:59
that if we can just keep them in the field long enough the population at home will say bring them back and this is bad
52:04
there's no evidence for that right now but there is a lot of evidence that our position economically is going to
52:11
continue to weaken you had muhammad el arian just the other day who said a 100 basis point increase
52:20
in the interest rates in other words a one percent rise could send the american
52:25
economy into a recession a deep recession maybe something worse well
52:33
the longer this goes on the harsher the outcome for us here at home
52:38
you know that gasoline prices like so many things are lagging indicators
52:44
so the real problems have not even struck yet so if you look at the prices of food
52:50
energy metals these kinds of commodities then add to that the enormous sovereign
52:57
national debt that we have to service and the unambiguous requirement
53:02
to increase interest rates and deal with inflation that is ostensibly dangerous
53:09
to the economy the question is how long before we fall apart how long before we we simply can't go on
53:17
i mean i'm always reminded of the question that used to come up in graduate school and then subsequently
53:23
when i was teaching when did the british leave india well the british did not leave india when
53:29
they should have when it made sense to do so when it was strategically advisable they left india when their
53:35
debt to gdp ratio was 240 percent after world war ii in 1947 that's when
53:43
they left because they were broke i suspect that we'll have something similar to that here in the united
53:49
states that will be a game changer but all the expectations of imminent failure in
53:55
russia i think are ridiculous i don't see any of that and i think they'll stay
54:00
the course it's vital it's a vital strategic interest for them it isn't for us it never has been
54:06
that's the problem


thank you very much for inviting me i appreciate it i wish you guys well thank
54:24
you so much and uh you know judging from the feedback we're getting our audience salutes you and thanks you for your
54:29
honesty in a time of of just complete deceit so thank you so much for joining us well there americans are
54:36
beginning to figure things out it's it's slow painful but they're beginning to think figure
54:42
things out and when you start to hear people refer to anyone they disagree with as a traitor
54:48
you're in a lot of trouble that doesn't speak of strength that suggests real weakness yeah the
54:54
government and the people that run it and as i've been saying the president would step forward and put a stop to it
54:59
but he won't



USA IN VERY VERY DEEP SHIT ......

LISTEN TO THE REST
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 12:06:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793
First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368
AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
INSIGHTS BY THE BUCKET LOAD .... WILL BE INTERESTING TO LOOK BACK IN YEAR OR SO AND SEE HOW INSIGHTFUL THEY REALLY ARE ..... MAKES SENSE TO ME .... BUT WHO KNOWS?
PUTIN ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS ... late 2021/2022
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
41:26
Q -
what you think of of how biden responded and also putin's decision to invade do you think that he had other options and
41:32
strategically from a russian point of view was this strategically the right move or do you think there was possibly more
41:38
room for diplomacy not only on uh nato and missiles but also on the status of the donbas and the war there?????
41:46
A-
well i think uh the one voice of reason in the biden administration is the cia director uh or
41:53
the national intelligence director and that is william burns uh
41:58
he has always been a voice of reason on the subject of russia and he has tried to
42:04
what's the right word MODULATE RUSSIAN HATE [IN US ADMINISTRATIONS/DEPTS/CONGRESS ]
42:10
that is so prevalent but again he's being crushed by those who see
42:15
russia as something that has to be DENATIONALIZED much as the LEFT is denationalizing the united states
42:21
as a place whose borders have to be opened to allow mass migration from the developing world into russia
42:27
all of these things are part and parcel of the reasons people HATE RUSSIA [STRONG NATION IDENTITY] and of course
42:32
russia declares itself to be a an ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN country that's completely unacceptable because [LEFTIE] ATHEISM
42:38
NIHILISM MULTICULTURALISM [ JEWISH STYLED IDEOLOGY = MOST JEWS ARE ACTUALLY ATHEISTS YOU KNOW ] all of these things are are caught up
42:43
together [IN LEFTIST / SOCIALIST / LGBTIQ AGENDAS IDENTITY POLITICS ETC ] and there is a vile hatred for anybody who thinks
42:49
the kinds of things that EXIST IN RUSSIA could be remotely positive in any way
42:55
william burns has tried to push back against that he's tried to reason with people about it it hasn't worked very
43:00
well but i think there was a chance for a short time
[ IOW DIFFERENT CULTURAL VALUES EXIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES ... AND THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED NOT HATED LIKE THE EXTREME LIBERAL WEST HATES RUSSIA N CHINA AND OTHER ASIAN / AFRICAN NATIONS - IT IS PATHOLOGICAL ITS SICK SHIT INTOLERANCE --- OTHER COUNTRIES N PEOPLE HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS TOO - USA UK EU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY ARE -- THEY DO !!!!! ]
NOW PUTIN from where he sits looks at what's
43:07
going on he's aware of the things that we're discussing but he ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in
43:13
EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS at
43:18
luhansk and donetsk and i think he was persuaded that this would happen and that obviously the
43:26
donetsk and luhansk republics and their population WOULD BE DESTROYED and he could NOT SIT BY and tolerate that i
43:33
also think he thought that there WAS NO HOPE that every time he tried to make the case which he did several times
43:39
no one WOULD LISTEN TO HIM ...
.. somebody said well the reason this didn't happen under donald trump was that donald trump is
43:45
strong and no one would challenge him it had a LOT LESS to do with that than
43:51
trump's private willingness to listen to mr putin's position -- what disappointed putin and i think
43:57
many others was donald trump's INABILITY TO GET CONTROL of his own ADMINISTRATION he appointed people that were absolutely
44:04
OPPOSED TO HIM AND HIS THINKING so from the moment he opened his mouth and said why can't we have a better relationship
44:09
with russia he was SABOTAGED AND SUBVERTED [ BY THE DEEP STATE OPERATORS ] PUTIN realized that then i think he waited to see how biden
44:16
would respond and of course you know that BIDEN WAS BRAGGING about how he told putin that he was a VICIOUS KILLER AND A THUG
44;22
how proud he was of INSULTING THE MAN TO HIS FACE and denigrating him and and what he's done inside russia
44:31
i think you put that together with the build-up in the east and i think he felt russia was genuinely
44:36
genuinely THREATENED and he thought it was only a matter of time until something akin to the pershing two
44:41
missiles that we once had on the ground in germany would SHOW UP IN EASTERN UKRAINE ......
and we can all sit here and say oh well
44:48
that wouldn't have happened but he had a lot of reason to believe that IT WOULD for the reasons we've already discussed the nato-ization of
44:54
things and that's the kind that remember the pershing 2 was a HYPERSONIC missile
45:00
you know you're talking a few minutes and it lands in moscow and he kept telling people this NO ONE WOULD LISTEN
45:06
and there was no willingness to to REASSURE HIM and his government in any way shape or form that this was not the
45:11
intention
so i think he RIGHTLY CONCLUDED he didn't have much choice and i think the biggest mistake that
45:17
he's made if he's made any with this operation so i think PUTIN' S TRIED TO BE TOO CAREFUL
45:23
and i think it's tragic but when you when you do what he's done with his force you try very hard to avoid
45:30
unnecessary civilian casualties and avoid damage you end up in the position --- he's in this thing has lasted three
45:36
weeks longer than than he would have liked it creates opportunities for your enemies
45:42
for your opponents to to meddle in in what's happening it gives false hope to
45:47
people on the other side that's the problem and that's what he's up against and i'm sure he's heard that
45:53
from his inner circle i'm sure some of his senior officers have said that ....
AND IF you try to convince anybody in
45:59
the united states by the way that vladimir putin was remotely concerned about the loss of civilian life in
46:04
ukraine well they'll LAUGH YOU OFF THE STAGE " that's impossible he's evil he's terrible he's bad " it's a lot of nonsense
46:10
he was and he still is .......
i think i think he would like to get an AGREEMENT because i don't think he wants
46:16
anything to do with going into kiev yeah that's the last option i mean if
46:21
you look at it right now karkiv and kiev are about it the cauldron [ IE IN SOUTH EAST 60K TROOPS CAUGHT ] it has to be dealt with and
46:28
they're still laying siege to mariUPOL but i'm afraid given the enemy that they have cornered there the 3 000 AZOV
46:35
members they're probably going to reduce it and be done with it but that's clearly not what he wants in KARKIV
46:41
that's clearly not what he wants in KIEV but if he can't get somebody to put their name on the agreement and
46:46
agree to those basic terms then i suppose HE'S GOING TO ACT ....
46:51
Q --
well has attacked kharkiv i mean there were a billion buildings hit there yeah the question is whether they will uh
46:58
actually go in and the in the way they treat it the way they did grozny for example??????
A --
47:04
yes i think you're right max and that's the point aaron if you go back to world war ii one of the first things that all
47:11
sides learned in the war was that you don't win a city by going room to room and building the building to flush out
47:17
your enemy doesn't work you bring up artillery you lower the guns and direct fire and you bring down
47:24
city blocks that's what happened in warsaw it happened in stalingrad it happened
47:29
all over europe all during the war when we went into manila we did exactly the same thing it was ferocious nobody wants
47:36
to do that it is the worst possible outcome
and that's why for instance as i was
47:41
telling you earlier i looked at some film footage this morning that came from poland that was
47:46
transmitted into poland from ukraine showing ukrainian citizens that had showed up at a exit point from maripol
47:54
poll where the russians said come out we have humanitarian assistance in other words food and medicines and so forth
48:01
and you will be protected and sure enough there was the AZOV battalion you're not leaving you're not going
48:07
anywhere and the people of course were destraught but that's where we are
THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SHIT .... AND BEHIND IT ALL ARE THE CRAZIES IN THE USA UK AND CONGRESS AND THE EU ...FUCKING CRAZIES THOSE EVIL FARKING CUNTS ARE EVERYWHERE ....
48:12
yeah we're seeing a lot of these sort of incidents at checkpoints of motorists
48:18
being shot particularly men there may have been even some uh western journalists or a journalist
48:25
who was shot at one of these checkpoints uh still looking into that but that narrative obviously isn't
48:32
getting out
48:56
table because there have really been no negotiations for the last year that have had any effect at all so now we're
49:02
starting to see some movement i think vladimir zelinski has said publicly that ukraine does not wish to join
49:10
nato i guess my my question is do you think i mean you have sources
49:17
all around the region do you think zielenski even has the ability to negotiate given the different forces in
49:25
ukrainian politics the hardline forces the u.s um and how do you see the negotiations
49:32
shaping up when the u.s is so at least at this point when the biden administration is so hostile and
49:38
determined to escalate ................... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LISTEN ...... HIS CLOSING ADVICES INSIGHT
well let's be frank because zielinski right now has better press than mother
49:44
teresa uh so he's reluctant to give that up
49:50
and he's become a rock star to the west pretending to be a lot of things that
49:56
he's not but it's worked very well for him he has always been in danger of some of
50:02
the hardliners the radicals that control frankly the uh sbu the
50:08
equivalent of the secret police inside ukraine as well as the military
50:14
of being assassinated himself if he's if he went too far
50:19
i don't know if that's still the case i'm sure there's some some truth to that but i really think
50:24
that uh the cards are in the hands of uh washington and in the hands of president biden and
50:30
president biden is in a position that's not very different since aaron mate is interested in vietnam
50:36
uh not very different from lyndon johnson in this sense lyndon johnson wanted to end the war in
50:42
vietnam in fact there's a lot of evidence that he didn't want to go there at all but it didn't make any difference
50:47
because he was afraid that if he didn't do those things that he would be outed as soft on communism and a friend of the
50:54
reds and so forth and so johnson found it impossible to simply cut his losses
51:00
and get out which was the right thing to do in 1968-69 all the generals privately said this is
51:06
a waste of time we're not going to win it let's go he didn't do it and obviously he didn't run for
51:12
re-election i think biden's in a similar position right now if he if he he's got the he's got the
51:19
uniparty out there depicting him as feckless weak incompetent incapable
51:25
if he were to simply say all right mr z the show's over
51:30
sign on the dotted line we'll back you we'll help you rebuild et etc et cetera
51:36
uh i i think he can't do that i think he should but i don't think he can and i
51:41
think every time he's inclined in that direction he's warned by the people around him of the dangers associated
51:47
with that now there's political dangers yeah but there are a couple of things that are also happening the assumption
51:53
is well if we just keep the russians in the field long enough their army will collapse well there's no evidence for
51:59
that if we can just keep them in the field long enough the population at home will say bring them back and this is bad
52:04
there's no evidence for that right now but there is a lot of evidence that our position economically is going to
52:11
continue to weaken you had muhammad el arian just the other day who said a 100 basis point increase
52:20
in the interest rates in other words a one percent rise could send the american
52:25
economy into a recession a deep recession maybe something worse well
52:33
the longer this goes on the harsher the outcome for us here at home
52:38
you know that gasoline prices like so many things are lagging indicators
52:44
so the real problems have not even struck yet so if you look at the prices of food
52:50
energy metals these kinds of commodities then add to that the enormous sovereign
52:57
national debt that we have to service and the unambiguous requirement
53:02
to increase interest rates and deal with inflation that is ostensibly dangerous
53:09
to the economy the question is how long before we fall apart how long before we we simply can't go on
53:17
i mean i'm always reminded of the question that used to come up in graduate school and then subsequently
53:23
when i was teaching when did the british leave india well the british did not leave india when
53:29
they should have when it made sense to do so when it was strategically advisable they left india when their
53:35
debt to gdp ratio was 240 percent after world war ii in 1947 that's when
53:43
they left because they were broke i suspect that we'll have something similar to that here in the united
53:49
states that will be a game changer but all the expectations of imminent failure in
53:55
russia i think are ridiculous i don't see any of that and i think they'll stay
54:00
the course it's vital it's a vital strategic interest for them it isn't for us it never has been
54:06
that's the problem
thank you very much for inviting me i appreciate it i wish you guys well thank
54:24
you so much and uh you know judging from the feedback we're getting our audience salutes you and thanks you for your
54:29
honesty in a time of of just complete deceit so thank you so much for joining us well there americans are
54:36
beginning to figure things out it's it's slow painful but they're beginning to think figure
54:42
things out and when you start to hear people refer to anyone they disagree with as a traitor
54:48
you're in a lot of trouble that doesn't speak of strength that suggests real weakness yeah the
54:54
government and the people that run it and as i've been saying the president would step forward and put a stop to it
54:59
but he won't
USA IN VERY VERY DEEP SHIT ......
LISTEN TO THE REST
...... and he said look if our cause is just why do we have to lie about it ?
and i think that's where we are right now in washington
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 12:24:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793
First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368
AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
INSIGHTS BY THE BUCKET LOAD .... WILL BE INTERESTING TO LOOK BACK IN YEAR OR SO AND SEE HOW INSIGHTFUL THEY REALLY ARE ..... MAKES SENSE TO ME .... BUT WHO KNOWS?
PUTIN ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS ... late 2021/2022
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
41:26
Q -
what you think of of how biden responded and also putin's decision to invade do you think that he had other options and
41:32
strategically from a russian point of view was this strategically the right move or do you think there was possibly more
41:38
room for diplomacy not only on uh nato and missiles but also on the status of the donbas and the war there?????
41:46
A-
well i think uh the one voice of reason in the biden administration is the cia director uh or
41:53
the national intelligence director and that is william burns uh
41:58
he has always been a voice of reason on the subject of russia and he has tried to
42:04
what's the right word MODULATE RUSSIAN HATE [IN US ADMINISTRATIONS/DEPTS/CONGRESS ]
42:10
that is so prevalent but again he's being crushed by those who see
42:15
russia as something that has to be DENATIONALIZED much as the LEFT is denationalizing the united states
42:21
as a place whose borders have to be opened to allow mass migration from the developing world into russia
42:27
all of these things are part and parcel of the reasons people HATE RUSSIA [STRONG NATION IDENTITY] and of course
42:32
russia declares itself to be a an ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN country that's completely unacceptable because [LEFTIE] ATHEISM
42:38
NIHILISM MULTICULTURALISM [ JEWISH STYLED IDEOLOGY = MOST JEWS ARE ACTUALLY ATHEISTS YOU KNOW ] all of these things are are caught up
42:43
together [IN LEFTIST / SOCIALIST / LGBTIQ AGENDAS IDENTITY POLITICS ETC ] and there is a vile hatred for anybody who thinks
42:49
the kinds of things that EXIST IN RUSSIA could be remotely positive in any way
42:55
william burns has tried to push back against that he's tried to reason with people about it it hasn't worked very
43:00
well but i think there was a chance for a short time
[ IOW DIFFERENT CULTURAL VALUES EXIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES ... AND THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED NOT HATED LIKE THE EXTREME LIBERAL WEST HATES RUSSIA N CHINA AND OTHER ASIAN / AFRICAN NATIONS - IT IS PATHOLOGICAL ITS SICK SHIT INTOLERANCE --- OTHER COUNTRIES N PEOPLE HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS TOO - USA UK EU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY ARE -- THEY DO !!!!! ]
NOW PUTIN from where he sits looks at what's
43:07
going on he's aware of the things that we're discussing but he ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in
43:13
EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS at
43:18
luhansk and donetsk and i think he was persuaded that this would happen and that obviously the
43:26
donetsk and luhansk republics and their population WOULD BE DESTROYED and he could NOT SIT BY and tolerate that i
43:33
also think he thought that there WAS NO HOPE that every time he tried to make the case which he did several times
43:39
no one WOULD LISTEN TO HIM ...
.. somebody said well the reason this didn't happen under donald trump was that donald trump is
43:45
strong and no one would challenge him it had a LOT LESS to do with that than
43:51
trump's private willingness to listen to mr putin's position -- what disappointed putin and i think
43:57
many others was donald trump's INABILITY TO GET CONTROL of his own ADMINISTRATION he appointed people that were absolutely
44:04
OPPOSED TO HIM AND HIS THINKING so from the moment he opened his mouth and said why can't we have a better relationship
44:09
with russia he was SABOTAGED AND SUBVERTED [ BY THE DEEP STATE OPERATORS ] PUTIN realized that then i think he waited to see how biden
44:16
would respond and of course you know that BIDEN WAS BRAGGING about how he told putin that he was a VICIOUS KILLER AND A THUG
44;22
how proud he was of INSULTING THE MAN TO HIS FACE and denigrating him and and what he's done inside russia
44:31
i think you put that together with the build-up in the east and i think he felt russia was genuinely
44:36
genuinely THREATENED and he thought it was only a matter of time until something akin to the pershing two
44:41
missiles that we once had on the ground in germany would SHOW UP IN EASTERN UKRAINE ......
and we can all sit here and say oh well
44:48
that wouldn't have happened but he had a lot of reason to believe that IT WOULD for the reasons we've already discussed the nato-ization of
44:54
things and that's the kind that remember the pershing 2 was a HYPERSONIC missile
45:00
you know you're talking a few minutes and it lands in moscow and he kept telling people this NO ONE WOULD LISTEN
45:06
and there was no willingness to to REASSURE HIM and his government in any way shape or form that this was not the
45:11
intention
so i think he RIGHTLY CONCLUDED he didn't have much choice and i think the biggest mistake that
45:17
he's made if he's made any with this operation so i think PUTIN' S TRIED TO BE TOO CAREFUL
45:23
and i think it's tragic but when you when you do what he's done with his force you try very hard to avoid
45:30
unnecessary civilian casualties and avoid damage you end up in the position --- he's in this thing has lasted three
45:36
weeks longer than than he would have liked it creates opportunities for your enemies
45:42
for your opponents to to meddle in in what's happening it gives false hope to
45:47
people on the other side that's the problem and that's what he's up against and i'm sure he's heard that
45:53
from his inner circle i'm sure some of his senior officers have said that ....
AND IF you try to convince anybody in
45:59
the united states by the way that vladimir putin was remotely concerned about the loss of civilian life in
46:04
ukraine well they'll LAUGH YOU OFF THE STAGE " that's impossible he's evil he's terrible he's bad " it's a lot of nonsense
46:10
he was and he still is .......
i think i think he would like to get an AGREEMENT because i don't think he wants
46:16
anything to do with going into kiev yeah that's the last option i mean if
46:21
you look at it right now karkiv and kiev are about it the cauldron [ IE IN SOUTH EAST 60K TROOPS CAUGHT ] it has to be dealt with and
46:28
they're still laying siege to mariUPOL but i'm afraid given the enemy that they have cornered there the 3 000 AZOV
46:35
members they're probably going to reduce it and be done with it but that's clearly not what he wants in KARKIV
46:41
that's clearly not what he wants in KIEV but if he can't get somebody to put their name on the agreement and
46:46
agree to those basic terms then i suppose HE'S GOING TO ACT ....
46:51
Q --
well has attacked kharkiv i mean there were a billion buildings hit there yeah the question is whether they will uh
46:58
actually go in and the in the way they treat it the way they did grozny for example??????
A --
47:04
yes i think you're right max and that's the point aaron if you go back to world war ii one of the first things that all
47:11
sides learned in the war was that you don't win a city by going room to room and building the building to flush out
47:17
your enemy doesn't work you bring up artillery you lower the guns and direct fire and you bring down
47:24
city blocks that's what happened in warsaw it happened in stalingrad it happened
47:29
all over europe all during the war when we went into manila we did exactly the same thing it was ferocious nobody wants
47:36
to do that it is the worst possible outcome
and that's why for instance as i was
47:41
telling you earlier i looked at some film footage this morning that came from poland that was
47:46
transmitted into poland from ukraine showing ukrainian citizens that had showed up at a exit point from maripol
47:54
poll where the russians said come out we have humanitarian assistance in other words food and medicines and so forth
48:01
and you will be protected and sure enough there was the AZOV battalion you're not leaving you're not going
48:07
anywhere and the people of course were destraught but that's where we are
THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SHIT .... AND BEHIND IT ALL ARE THE CRAZIES IN THE USA UK AND CONGRESS AND THE EU ...FUCKING CRAZIES THOSE EVIL FARKING CUNTS ARE EVERYWHERE ....
48:12
yeah we're seeing a lot of these sort of incidents at checkpoints of motorists
48:18
being shot particularly men there may have been even some uh western journalists or a journalist
48:25
who was shot at one of these checkpoints uh still looking into that but that narrative obviously isn't
48:32
getting out
48:56
table because there have really been no negotiations for the last year that have had any effect at all so now we're
49:02
starting to see some movement i think vladimir zelinski has said publicly that ukraine does not wish to join
49:10
nato i guess my my question is do you think i mean you have sources
49:17
all around the region do you think zielenski even has the ability to negotiate given the different forces in
49:25
ukrainian politics the hardline forces the u.s um and how do you see the negotiations
49:32
shaping up when the u.s is so at least at this point when the biden administration is so hostile and
49:38
determined to escalate ................... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LISTEN ...... HIS CLOSING ADVICES INSIGHT
well let's be frank because zielinski right now has better press than mother
49:44
teresa uh so he's reluctant to give that up
49:50
and he's become a rock star to the west pretending to be a lot of things that
49:56
he's not but it's worked very well for him he has always been in danger of some of
50:02
the hardliners the radicals that control frankly the uh sbu the
50:08
equivalent of the secret police inside ukraine as well as the military
50:14
of being assassinated himself if he's if he went too far
50:19
i don't know if that's still the case i'm sure there's some some truth to that but i really think
50:24
that uh the cards are in the hands of uh washington and in the hands of president biden and
50:30
president biden is in a position that's not very different since aaron mate is interested in vietnam
50:36
uh not very different from lyndon johnson in this sense lyndon johnson wanted to end the war in
50:42
vietnam in fact there's a lot of evidence that he didn't want to go there at all but it didn't make any difference
50:47
because he was afraid that if he didn't do those things that he would be outed as soft on communism and a friend of the
50:54
reds and so forth and so johnson found it impossible to simply cut his losses
51:00
and get out which was the right thing to do in 1968-69 all the generals privately said this is
51:06
a waste of time we're not going to win it let's go he didn't do it and obviously he didn't run for
51:12
re-election i think biden's in a similar position right now if he if he he's got the he's got the
51:19
uniparty out there depicting him as feckless weak incompetent incapable
51:25
if he were to simply say all right mr z the show's over
51:30
sign on the dotted line we'll back you we'll help you rebuild et etc et cetera
51:36
uh i i think he can't do that i think he should but i don't think he can and i
51:41
think every time he's inclined in that direction he's warned by the people around him of the dangers associated
51:47
with that now there's political dangers yeah but there are a couple of things that are also happening the assumption
51:53
is well if we just keep the russians in the field long enough their army will collapse well there's no evidence for
51:59
that if we can just keep them in the field long enough the population at home will say bring them back and this is bad
52:04
there's no evidence for that right now but there is a lot of evidence that our position economically is going to
52:11
continue to weaken you had muhammad el arian just the other day who said a 100 basis point increase
52:20
in the interest rates in other words a one percent rise could send the american
52:25
economy into a recession a deep recession maybe something worse well
52:33
the longer this goes on the harsher the outcome for us here at home
52:38
you know that gasoline prices like so many things are lagging indicators
52:44
so the real problems have not even struck yet so if you look at the prices of food
52:50
energy metals these kinds of commodities then add to that the enormous sovereign
52:57
national debt that we have to service and the unambiguous requirement
53:02
to increase interest rates and deal with inflation that is ostensibly dangerous
53:09
to the economy the question is how long before we fall apart how long before we we simply can't go on
53:17
i mean i'm always reminded of the question that used to come up in graduate school and then subsequently
53:23
when i was teaching when did the british leave india well the british did not leave india when
53:29
they should have when it made sense to do so when it was strategically advisable they left india when their
53:35
debt to gdp ratio was 240 percent after world war ii in 1947 that's when
53:43
they left because they were broke i suspect that we'll have something similar to that here in the united
53:49
states that will be a game changer but all the expectations of imminent failure in
53:55
russia i think are ridiculous i don't see any of that and i think they'll stay
54:00
the course it's vital it's a vital strategic interest for them it isn't for us it never has been
54:06
that's the problem
thank you very much for inviting me i appreciate it i wish you guys well thank
54:24
you so much and uh you know judging from the feedback we're getting our audience salutes you and thanks you for your
54:29
honesty in a time of of just complete deceit so thank you so much for joining us well there americans are
54:36
beginning to figure things out it's it's slow painful but they're beginning to think figure
54:42
things out and when you start to hear people refer to anyone they disagree with as a traitor
54:48
you're in a lot of trouble that doesn't speak of strength that suggests real weakness yeah the
54:54
government and the people that run it and as i've been saying the president would step forward and put a stop to it
54:59
but he won't
USA IN VERY VERY DEEP SHIT ......
LISTEN TO THE REST
...... and he said look if our cause is just why do we have to lie about it ?
and i think that's where we are right now in washington
i think what's so significant
56:27
or one of the things that was so significant about someone like doug mcgregor
56:34
saying what he said about the natoization of ukraine is that he was the lead strategist for wesley clark the
56:41
nato supreme allied commander the guy who presided for at centcom for the pentagon
56:48
over europe um he was a one of the you know top strategists
56:54
for nato saying openly that nato drove us to this point pushed
57:02
to the brink of war baited the bear and now
57:08
is getting hit at its de facto bases inside ukraine like the yaraviv base
57:14
and that's what i think is so threatening about someone like doug mcgregor to the war party or
57:19
what he calls the uniparty in washington you know which traverses the senate from lindsey graham
57:26
to bob menendez to the newland lincoln state department uh but they're it's it's so it's really
57:33
remarkable to see that level of candor and criticism uh when everyone's just told nato is a
57:39
defensive alliance it's a defensive alliance

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

DEEP DEEP SHIT IS COMING TO AMERICA AND THE DELUDED WEST
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 12:58:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
FALSE FLAG BIO-WEAPONS ATTACKS ..... AND THE NATO-IZATION OF UKRAINE AND EUROPE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Q -- aaron go ahead well let me ask you about the speculation and allegations that have been hurled in recent days about biolabs
25:31
and chemical weapons false flag plots uh first you had victoria nuland
25:36
under questioning by marco rubio in the senate last week asked directly if ukraine has chemical or biological
25:43
weapons she didn't give a direct answer she did say that uh ukraine has biological facilities and she's
25:49
concerned about russia those facilities falling into russian hands which raises the obvious question
25:55
that if they're benign then why is she concerned about russia possessing them and then right after that we started to
26:00
get these allegations coming out from both the u.s and russia that the other side is plotting false flag chemical
26:06
attacks i'm wondering what you make of all this?????
A ---
well usually the winning side does not
26:12
stage a false leg and right now the RUSSIANS are CLEARLY WINNING on the battlefield so i don't
26:18
see any particular reason why they would stage a false flag if anything the ukrainians might be
26:24
interested as a latch last-ditch effort to drag us in they could uh
26:29
certainly turn to the use of biochemicals if they can weaponize them and use them effectively
26:35
or if they've already done so they could simply fire a missile that is of russian origin and design into poland
26:42
and claim the russians have done it that is a possibility
we should be on THE ALERT for that sort of thing i don't
26:49
see the russians doing that they don't need it if anything the russians just want to
26:55
come to the table get a signature on A CEASEFIRE ARRANGEMENT see their terms met and as far as i can tell the
27:01
terms have not changed very much and they're very straightforward
number one ukraine will be neutral and not aligned
27:07
with any block number
two uh the donbass regions de facto independence and and
27:12
russian identity will be acknowledged by uh kiev or kiev
27:18
and then [third] finally uh the ukrainians will renounce any claim on crimea which as we all know this is
27:25
an a historical claim it's never been ukrainian those have been the sort of standard
27:31
three now there are other things that they want to discuss no doubt
and FOUR they want to be certain that future governments will not be incurringly
27:38
HOSTILE TO MOSCOW and HOST WEAPONS and SYSTEMS systems designed to DESTROY RUSSIA on their soil
27:45
that's clear but i think they'd go along with something on the model of the AUSTRIAN STATE TREATY [ NOT IN NATO]
27:51
clearly uh mr BLINKEN uh victoria NEWLAND and their COHORTS [ IE BILLIGERANT WARMONGERING LIARS] and i suspect
27:56
mr SOROS's also got his hand in this are ALL STONEWALLING that till the LAST UKRAINIAN IS DEAD i guess
28:04
uh i hope not but it certainly looks that way
Q --- and on the
28:09
chemical weapons allegations do you see a parallel here to syria a sort of recycling of the syria playbook where
28:14
the u.s accused syria and their russian ally of committing chemical attacks uh syria
28:21
with russia's support that was the allegation but meanwhile as we know from the reporting of seymour hirsch and also from opcw leaks that all the
28:28
intelligence pointed to these chemical attacks either being carried out or staged by
28:33
sectarian death squad REBELS FIGHTING SYRIAN government?????
A --- well there's a lot of evidence for that
28:39
there's also i'm told some evidence for the involvement of UK MI6 INVOLVEMENT [ THINK SKRIPALS NOVICHOK IN UK ] which is a very effective organization
28:45
and very adept at this sort of business in syria they may once again be involved who
28:50
knows i mean we all have intelligence services ALL intelligence services are involved in these CONFLICTS in one way
28:56
or another so i think if you go to ted postel's work who's very good on this
29:02
as well as to british sources and you will confirm what you just just outlined....
29:07
you're asking me what i know and unfortunately i don't know too much what i know is what is open source
29:13
and i'm prepared to believe any number of different POSSIBILITIES but i've said repeatedly until someone
29:20
gets in there who is not ukrainian or russian and looks at THE EVIDENCE we're probably not going to KNOW WITH CERTAINTY
29:26
what's really there ...
i found that uh in the BALKANS when we were dealing with the SERBS and so many
29:32
things they were accused of turned out TO BE FALSE that the FINISH were enormously helpful the FINNS would go in and they were THE
29:38
TRUTH TELLERS we really NEED some TRUTH TELLERS LIKE THAT but for the moment that's not going to happen so the worst
29:44
thing that could happen is a false flag we have to BE PREPARED for that and again that's where the PRESIDENT of
29:50
the united states plays such a CRITICAL ROLE unfortunately mr trump was DECEIVED on both occasions
29:56
because his inner circle kept pushing him and pushing him to launch those missiles
30:02
and ultimately we did they went into the dirt they accomplished nothing by the way the russians accommodated it
30:09
it's unfortunate but that's the way it went
but finally in 2019 when mr TRUMP
30:14
was AMBUSHED by people in his own administration and the military in an attempt to bring on a WAR with IRAN
30:22
after the shoot-down of the global hawk that was deliberately flying a path that
30:27
everyone knew would be engaged HE SAID NO and ended that possibility thank
30:33
goodness so i think it depends on the president and uh whomever is uh close to him
30:40
to make the decision no we're not going to act if that in fact occurs
30:45
Max Blumenthal -- yeah i think uh there there is there's the higher chance now of some kind of
30:52
staged event or false flag than at any point because all of the other military options have been expended i
30:59
was actually in a debate on cgtn with one of the main kind of ukrainian influencers who's a hardline
31:05
parliamentarian INA Safsan and when i heard her say that we are EXPECTING a chemical attack
31:10
that's WHEN I KNEW and then i started to SEE THIS NARRATIVE GET ROLLED OUT by all of the BIDEN PROXIES and the state of
31:16
newland proxies about biological weapons FALSE FLAG BY RUSSIA it became clear they WERE PREPARING FOR SOMETHING along
31:23
with all the censorship and the attacks on tucker carlson for actually because he would be the one
31:30
person with a national audience to push back on another DOUMA STYLE FALSE FLAG
31:35
incident so it really does feel like uh all the signals are BLINKING RED
31:40
as uh mitt romney's uh former advisor cofer black who went on to work for barisma
31:46
said days before 9 11.
Q --- um now on [NATO-ization issues]
31:51
on if you want to add anything to that feel free but i wanted to ask
31:57
you about another issue uh there was a a cruise missile attack on the YAROVIV BASE
32:04
which is just east of poland inside ukrainian territory and it's known as
32:09
this kind of international peacekeeping center
32:14
it was home to MERCENARIES and redditors who were coming uh because they were bored with their
32:20
lives as computer programmers to participate in a war they thought was going very well for ukraine let me just
32:26
throw up on screen some of the testimony from one of the people who was a witness to that
32:31
attack who was a u.s MEDIC who wanted to be a combat medic and you know this is from one of the
32:38
reddit chats [ SEE VIDEO FOR TEXT DETAILS]
-- " you weren't expecting missiles at a war?"
- " no just that not at that base at that particular time
32:43
surprised us including the ukrainians"
and then he gets called AN IDIOT and then he refers to the volunteers
32:50
who have come in from around the country as CANNON FODDER you know basically being bodies
32:57
shoveled in front of the russians he called the ukrainian commanders " crazy" um
33:02
and so on and then they all turned tail and RAN HOME at least 35 foreigners are
33:07
DEAD it could be as many as 200 but that seems to be the end of the ukrainian foreign legion but my question is not
33:13
only about that but about this wider issue of that base being there and having hosted many
33:20
NATO TRAINING SESSIONS could there have even been NATO TRAINERS who were hit in that attack and
33:27
can you address this um concept of the nato-ization of ukraine ..... i
33:34
mean most americans think ukraine has not been formally admitted into nato however we hear from the RUSSIAN SIDE
that it effectively has been NATO-IZED -- what do you know about this base and what about this wider concept of
33:46
natoization??????????????
A - .... well the NATO-ization HAS OCCURRED and this is one of the reasons why when
33:52
people say the probability that UKRAINE would be admitted to nato was always low
33:58
for all the usual reasons the lack of human rights
34:04
standards the lack of true democratic elections the overwhelming corruption
34:09
and so forth the problem with that is that the RUSSIANS have WATCHED carefully at how rapidly we are willing to wave
34:16
things in order to get new members into the alliance and i think they concluded that
34:22
regardless of what the true circumstances were this NATO-IZATION had reached the POINT
34:27
where if russia did not FIRMLY OBJECT and demonstrate its opposition
34:34
that ukraine would be admitted so i think the nato-ization argument IS VERY TRUE
34:40
and that's one of the reasons WE / USA GOT large numbers of people out of there ASAP when it became clear that the russians were going to
34:46
INTERVENE we didn't want HUNDREDS OF OUR ADVISORS and so forth CAPTURED BY THE RUSSIANS so yes the place is NATO-IZED
34:52
that's true but the nato-ization of ukraine is really U.S. LED
34:57
and and we tend to DRAG OTHER NATO MEMBERS WITH US ... the british are there because they tend to be fellow travelers with us
35:04
and like us they don't live on the continent so if things really go badly just like the united states the british
35:10
will simply go home to the island this is WHY LARGE NUMBERS OF EUROPEANS DISLIKE THEM INTENSELY and DON'T TRUST THEM [ OR THE USA ]
35:15
so yeah that that's VERY MUCH THE CASE .................
there's something else though at work
35:21
here and that is that PUTIN wanted to DEMONSTRATE - i'm sure he gave permission for this strike because i don't think
35:27
any operations west of the Dnieper river happen without his authorization because i know that in the original thinking there was
35:34
no desire to press west beyond the Dnieper river - i mean that that's the heart of ukraine
35:40
the people that live there really are ukrainian in language culture and so forth doesn't want to go there
35:47
and i think what he did is he said yes we'll do this because we need to SHOW THESE PEOPLE [ MERCENARIES / US TRAINERS + ] that we can reach out and
35:53
touch them ANYWHERE in ukraine-- this happened to be very close to the polish border so it it had a double
35:59
message it was a message to the POLES [ POLAND/EUROPE NATO ] that if you continue to provide
36:05
support to the ukrainians and if you try to widen escalate this war you too will
36:10
become a co-belligerent and ukraine and the WEST/NATO the POLES don't want that they know that
NEXT NATO-IZATION BIGGER PICTURES ARMS TREATIES IRAN ....
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
36:18
Q --- well on this uh topic of NATO-IZATION let me ask you about the dimensions of this that go beyond ukraine itself i'm asking
36:26
you to talk about for the last 20 years the us has been continuously dismantling arms control
36:32
treaties the anti-ballistic missile treaty was DISMANTLED in 2003 the conventional armed forces in europe
36:39
treaty expired in 2007. putin in his munich speech vocally PROTESTED that and
36:45
you know countries like ROMANIA and POLAND have built these US MISSILE SITES the u.s says that they're intended
36:51
to protect europe from iranian missiles i wanted to comment on that and the role
36:57
that this the dismantling of arms control treaties also the inf treaty uh which expired
37:02
under your administration under the trump administration how that's contributed to russia's feelings of feeling encircled
37:09
and how what those developments played into putin's decision to invade ukraine ???????
A -
37:16
i think all of those issues contributed to the build-up in the minds of russians of the NEED TO PROTECT
37:22
themselves there's NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT i think the decision on the INF TREATY was a serious mistake
37:28
the russians frankly were SHOCKED BY IT but there was a huge LOBBY
37:34
ALL NEOCONS on the inside of the administration as well as outside who were trying to convince everyone that
37:40
arms control was a waste of time arms control protected us in no way - arms
37:45
control should be abandoned
now i'm the first to admit that arms control is difficult because if you see
37:51
a violation by one side or the other you're very reluctant to admit it
37:57
because if you tell the other side that you're aware of their violation then you risk
38:02
revealing that you have the collection capability that you have sources maybe even human sources on the ground
38:09
reporting to you so you have to judge the violation very carefully and decide whether or not it is egregious enough
38:16
to justify bringing it to the table now i was not part of the inf talks at
38:21
the time but i was told by several people you have to know you have to understand they're not doing what they
38:27
said they would do and and we have to pull out of this and i looked at the EVIDENCE that i
38:32
could see and all of it seemed to point in the direction of RUSSIAN PARANOIA [FEARS]
38:38
about OUR BEHAVIOUR and you mentioned the missile sites down in romania for instance and i had
38:44
suggested on one occasion you know why don't we INVITE Russian officers to come over and view it if
38:51
we're absolutely convinced that this is all for the purpose of defending ourselves against a potential IRANIAN
38:57
ballistic missile attack then we should BRING THEM IN and let them LOOK AT IT and satisfy themselves that this is NO
39:04
THREAT TO RUSSIA well you can imagine the response that i elicited i was told that I'D LOST MY MIND and
39:09
this was never going to happen which leads me to believe that these things had VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH IRAN
39:15
and a great deal more to do with russia .......
again you're always weighing as a great power
39:21
the wisdom of doing something or not doing something on the assumption that what you do is going to have an effect on your
39:27
potential opponent i don't think we've done a good job of that and i think we have too readily
39:32
dismissed the potential adversary as too weak economically and too backward in
39:38
many ways to respond that's not true that has never been true the difference in the size of the
39:44
economy is real but that does not reflect on on the russian military or on the quality of
39:50
its scientific and technological capabilities so i think we've put ourselves in this
39:56
position and we we did so very in my judgment very cavalierly because we actually did
40:02
have a long period of time where we had established a degree of mutual trust and cooperation and all you have to do is
40:09
look at the space programs look at the extent to which we purchased russian rocket engines
40:15
uh look at the cooperation we've had with them on the jcpoa and other things
40:22
this is not being a black and white situation but we are now transforming it into one
40:28
which i think is stupid self-defeating and and unproductive and of course we're not thinking at all about the blowback
40:35
on ourselves economically and in other ways and we talk about proliferation of dangerous technology well the russians
40:42
have been very good about not necessarily providing much of what many of their alleged friends or temporary
40:49
partners have wanted what will they do in the future given the way we have treated them i i don't know but
40:56
i don't i don't see much good happening it does worry me a great deal
LOADS MORE GOES FOR 2 HOURS ......
Former top Pentagon advisor Col. Doug Macgregor on Russia-Ukraine war
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
Mar 17
"I have a dream. That every neo-Nazi militiaman will bear a Javelin on one shoulder and a MANPAD on the other. That Ukraine is turned into Afghanistan while every Raytheon executive gets a bonus. I need you to forget everything MLK said about the US war machine and launch WWIII."
Quote Tweet
Atlantic Council
@AtlanticCouncil
· Mar 17
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1504136027555958793
First response to Saudi buying oil in Yuan ⬇️
Just last November, the Biden administration approved a $650m weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
I guess Yemen could wait back then...
Quote Tweet
Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
United States government official
· Mar 17
I am pleased to announce nearly $585 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Yemenis. We’ve provided nearly $4.5 billion since the beginning of the war—we continue to respond to and find inclusive political solutions to the conflict. #YemenCantWait
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1504135908320186368
AMERICAN HYPOCRISY WRIT LARGE
INSIGHTS BY THE BUCKET LOAD .... WILL BE INTERESTING TO LOOK BACK IN YEAR OR SO AND SEE HOW INSIGHTFUL THEY REALLY ARE ..... MAKES SENSE TO ME .... BUT WHO KNOWS?
PUTIN ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS ... late 2021/2022
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
41:26
Q -
what you think of of how biden responded and also putin's decision to invade do you think that he had other options and
41:32
strategically from a russian point of view was this strategically the right move or do you think there was possibly more
41:38
room for diplomacy not only on uh nato and missiles but also on the status of the donbas and the war there?????
41:46
A-
well i think uh the one voice of reason in the biden administration is the cia director uh or
41:53
the national intelligence director and that is william burns uh
41:58
he has always been a voice of reason on the subject of russia and he has tried to
42:04
what's the right word MODULATE RUSSIAN HATE [IN US ADMINISTRATIONS/DEPTS/CONGRESS ]
42:10
that is so prevalent but again he's being crushed by those who see
42:15
russia as something that has to be DENATIONALIZED much as the LEFT is denationalizing the united states
42:21
as a place whose borders have to be opened to allow mass migration from the developing world into russia
42:27
all of these things are part and parcel of the reasons people HATE RUSSIA [STRONG NATION IDENTITY] and of course
42:32
russia declares itself to be a an ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN country that's completely unacceptable because [LEFTIE] ATHEISM
42:38
NIHILISM MULTICULTURALISM [ JEWISH STYLED IDEOLOGY = MOST JEWS ARE ACTUALLY ATHEISTS YOU KNOW ] all of these things are are caught up
42:43
together [IN LEFTIST / SOCIALIST / LGBTIQ AGENDAS IDENTITY POLITICS ETC ] and there is a vile hatred for anybody who thinks
42:49
the kinds of things that EXIST IN RUSSIA could be remotely positive in any way
42:55
william burns has tried to push back against that he's tried to reason with people about it it hasn't worked very
43:00
well but i think there was a chance for a short time
[ IOW DIFFERENT CULTURAL VALUES EXIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES ... AND THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED NOT HATED LIKE THE EXTREME LIBERAL WEST HATES RUSSIA N CHINA AND OTHER ASIAN / AFRICAN NATIONS - IT IS PATHOLOGICAL ITS SICK SHIT INTOLERANCE --- OTHER COUNTRIES N PEOPLE HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS TOO - USA UK EU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY ARE -- THEY DO !!!!! ]
NOW PUTIN from where he sits looks at what's
43:07
going on he's aware of the things that we're discussing but he ALSO SAW [LATE 2021/2022 ] A LARGE TROOP BUILDUP in
43:13
EASTERN UKRAINE approximately 60 000 TROOPS that were poised to STRIKE AT THE DONBAS REPUBLICS at
43:18
luhansk and donetsk and i think he was persuaded that this would happen and that obviously the
43:26
donetsk and luhansk republics and their population WOULD BE DESTROYED and he could NOT SIT BY and tolerate that i
43:33
also think he thought that there WAS NO HOPE that every time he tried to make the case which he did several times
43:39
no one WOULD LISTEN TO HIM ...
.. somebody said well the reason this didn't happen under donald trump was that donald trump is
43:45
strong and no one would challenge him it had a LOT LESS to do with that than
43:51
trump's private willingness to listen to mr putin's position -- what disappointed putin and i think
43:57
many others was donald trump's INABILITY TO GET CONTROL of his own ADMINISTRATION he appointed people that were absolutely
44:04
OPPOSED TO HIM AND HIS THINKING so from the moment he opened his mouth and said why can't we have a better relationship
44:09
with russia he was SABOTAGED AND SUBVERTED [ BY THE DEEP STATE OPERATORS ] PUTIN realized that then i think he waited to see how biden
44:16
would respond and of course you know that BIDEN WAS BRAGGING about how he told putin that he was a VICIOUS KILLER AND A THUG
44;22
how proud he was of INSULTING THE MAN TO HIS FACE and denigrating him and and what he's done inside russia
44:31
i think you put that together with the build-up in the east and i think he felt russia was genuinely
44:36
genuinely THREATENED and he thought it was only a matter of time until something akin to the pershing two
44:41
missiles that we once had on the ground in germany would SHOW UP IN EASTERN UKRAINE ......
and we can all sit here and say oh well
44:48
that wouldn't have happened but he had a lot of reason to believe that IT WOULD for the reasons we've already discussed the nato-ization of
44:54
things and that's the kind that remember the pershing 2 was a HYPERSONIC missile
45:00
you know you're talking a few minutes and it lands in moscow and he kept telling people this NO ONE WOULD LISTEN
45:06
and there was no willingness to to REASSURE HIM and his government in any way shape or form that this was not the
45:11
intention
so i think he RIGHTLY CONCLUDED he didn't have much choice and i think the biggest mistake that
45:17
he's made if he's made any with this operation so i think PUTIN' S TRIED TO BE TOO CAREFUL
45:23
and i think it's tragic but when you when you do what he's done with his force you try very hard to avoid
45:30
unnecessary civilian casualties and avoid damage you end up in the position --- he's in this thing has lasted three
45:36
weeks longer than than he would have liked it creates opportunities for your enemies
45:42
for your opponents to to meddle in in what's happening it gives false hope to
45:47
people on the other side that's the problem and that's what he's up against and i'm sure he's heard that
45:53
from his inner circle i'm sure some of his senior officers have said that ....
AND IF you try to convince anybody in
45:59
the united states by the way that vladimir putin was remotely concerned about the loss of civilian life in
46:04
ukraine well they'll LAUGH YOU OFF THE STAGE " that's impossible he's evil he's terrible he's bad " it's a lot of nonsense
46:10
he was and he still is .......
i think i think he would like to get an AGREEMENT because i don't think he wants
46:16
anything to do with going into kiev yeah that's the last option i mean if
46:21
you look at it right now karkiv and kiev are about it the cauldron [ IE IN SOUTH EAST 60K TROOPS CAUGHT ] it has to be dealt with and
46:28
they're still laying siege to mariUPOL but i'm afraid given the enemy that they have cornered there the 3 000 AZOV
46:35
members they're probably going to reduce it and be done with it but that's clearly not what he wants in KARKIV
46:41
that's clearly not what he wants in KIEV but if he can't get somebody to put their name on the agreement and
46:46
agree to those basic terms then i suppose HE'S GOING TO ACT ....
46:51
Q --
well has attacked kharkiv i mean there were a billion buildings hit there yeah the question is whether they will uh
46:58
actually go in and the in the way they treat it the way they did grozny for example??????
A --
47:04
yes i think you're right max and that's the point aaron if you go back to world war ii one of the first things that all
47:11
sides learned in the war was that you don't win a city by going room to room and building the building to flush out
47:17
your enemy doesn't work you bring up artillery you lower the guns and direct fire and you bring down
47:24
city blocks that's what happened in warsaw it happened in stalingrad it happened
47:29
all over europe all during the war when we went into manila we did exactly the same thing it was ferocious nobody wants
47:36
to do that it is the worst possible outcome
and that's why for instance as i was
47:41
telling you earlier i looked at some film footage this morning that came from poland that was
47:46
transmitted into poland from ukraine showing ukrainian citizens that had showed up at a exit point from maripol
47:54
poll where the russians said come out we have humanitarian assistance in other words food and medicines and so forth
48:01
and you will be protected and sure enough there was the AZOV battalion you're not leaving you're not going
48:07
anywhere and the people of course were destraught but that's where we are
THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SHIT .... AND BEHIND IT ALL ARE THE CRAZIES IN THE USA UK AND CONGRESS AND THE EU ...FUCKING CRAZIES THOSE EVIL FARKING CUNTS ARE EVERYWHERE ....
48:12
yeah we're seeing a lot of these sort of incidents at checkpoints of motorists
48:18
being shot particularly men there may have been even some uh western journalists or a journalist
48:25
who was shot at one of these checkpoints uh still looking into that but that narrative obviously isn't
48:32
getting out
48:56
table because there have really been no negotiations for the last year that have had any effect at all so now we're
49:02
starting to see some movement i think vladimir zelinski has said publicly that ukraine does not wish to join
49:10
nato i guess my my question is do you think i mean you have sources
49:17
all around the region do you think zielenski even has the ability to negotiate given the different forces in
49:25
ukrainian politics the hardline forces the u.s um and how do you see the negotiations
49:32
shaping up when the u.s is so at least at this point when the biden administration is so hostile and
49:38
determined to escalate ................... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LISTEN ...... HIS CLOSING ADVICES INSIGHT
well let's be frank because zielinski right now has better press than mother
49:44
teresa uh so he's reluctant to give that up
49:50
and he's become a rock star to the west pretending to be a lot of things that
49:56
he's not but it's worked very well for him he has always been in danger of some of
50:02
the hardliners the radicals that control frankly the uh sbu the
50:08
equivalent of the secret police inside ukraine as well as the military
50:14
of being assassinated himself if he's if he went too far
50:19
i don't know if that's still the case i'm sure there's some some truth to that but i really think
50:24
that uh the cards are in the hands of uh washington and in the hands of president biden and
50:30
president biden is in a position that's not very different since aaron mate is interested in vietnam
50:36
uh not very different from lyndon johnson in this sense lyndon johnson wanted to end the war in
50:42
vietnam in fact there's a lot of evidence that he didn't want to go there at all but it didn't make any difference
50:47
because he was afraid that if he didn't do those things that he would be outed as soft on communism and a friend of the
50:54
reds and so forth and so johnson found it impossible to simply cut his losses
51:00
and get out which was the right thing to do in 1968-69 all the generals privately said this is
51:06
a waste of time we're not going to win it let's go he didn't do it and obviously he didn't run for
51:12
re-election i think biden's in a similar position right now if he if he he's got the he's got the
51:19
uniparty out there depicting him as feckless weak incompetent incapable
51:25
if he were to simply say all right mr z the show's over
51:30
sign on the dotted line we'll back you we'll help you rebuild et etc et cetera
51:36
uh i i think he can't do that i think he should but i don't think he can and i
51:41
think every time he's inclined in that direction he's warned by the people around him of the dangers associated
51:47
with that now there's political dangers yeah but there are a couple of things that are also happening the assumption
51:53
is well if we just keep the russians in the field long enough their army will collapse well there's no evidence for
51:59
that if we can just keep them in the field long enough the population at home will say bring them back and this is bad
52:04
there's no evidence for that right now but there is a lot of evidence that our position economically is going to
52:11
continue to weaken you had muhammad el arian just the other day who said a 100 basis point increase
52:20
in the interest rates in other words a one percent rise could send the american
52:25
economy into a recession a deep recession maybe something worse well
52:33
the longer this goes on the harsher the outcome for us here at home
52:38
you know that gasoline prices like so many things are lagging indicators
52:44
so the real problems have not even struck yet so if you look at the prices of food
52:50
energy metals these kinds of commodities then add to that the enormous sovereign
52:57
national debt that we have to service and the unambiguous requirement
53:02
to increase interest rates and deal with inflation that is ostensibly dangerous
53:09
to the economy the question is how long before we fall apart how long before we we simply can't go on
53:17
i mean i'm always reminded of the question that used to come up in graduate school and then subsequently
53:23
when i was teaching when did the british leave india well the british did not leave india when
53:29
they should have when it made sense to do so when it was strategically advisable they left india when their
53:35
debt to gdp ratio was 240 percent after world war ii in 1947 that's when
53:43
they left because they were broke i suspect that we'll have something similar to that here in the united
53:49
states that will be a game changer but all the expectations of imminent failure in
53:55
russia i think are ridiculous i don't see any of that and i think they'll stay
54:00
the course it's vital it's a vital strategic interest for them it isn't for us it never has been
54:06
that's the problem
thank you very much for inviting me i appreciate it i wish you guys well thank
54:24
you so much and uh you know judging from the feedback we're getting our audience salutes you and thanks you for your
54:29
honesty in a time of of just complete deceit so thank you so much for joining us well there americans are
54:36
beginning to figure things out it's it's slow painful but they're beginning to think figure
54:42
things out and when you start to hear people refer to anyone they disagree with as a traitor
54:48
you're in a lot of trouble that doesn't speak of strength that suggests real weakness yeah the
54:54
government and the people that run it and as i've been saying the president would step forward and put a stop to it
54:59
but he won't
USA IN VERY VERY DEEP SHIT ......
LISTEN TO THE REST
...... and he said look if our cause is just why do we have to lie about it ?
and i think that's where we are right now in washington
i think what's so significant
56:27
or one of the things that was so significant about someone like doug mcgregor
56:34
saying what he said about the natoization of ukraine is that he was the lead strategist for wesley clark the
56:41
nato supreme allied commander the guy who presided for at centcom for the pentagon
56:48
over europe um he was a one of the you know top strategists
56:54
for nato saying openly that nato drove us to this point pushed
57:02
to the brink of war baited the bear and now
57:08
is getting hit at its de facto bases inside ukraine like the yaraviv base
57:14
and that's what i think is so threatening about someone like doug mcgregor to the war party or
57:19
what he calls the uniparty in washington you know which traverses the senate from lindsey graham
57:26
to bob menendez to the newland lincoln state department uh but they're it's it's so it's really
57:33
remarkable to see that level of candor and criticism uh when everyone's just told nato is a
57:39
defensive alliance it's a defensive alliance
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
DEEP DEEP SHIT IS COMING TO AMERICA AND THE DELUDED WEST
AARON N MAX CHAT ...

58:27
that's why it's so important to get voices that have been on the inside that know how wars are fought
58:33
how they work and what are the interests that fuel them to hear from someone like colonel mcgregor no matter how many other
58:40
disagreements we have with him on on other matters yeah and it's interesting because
58:46
you have this trend in the pentagon of what the right attacks is the woke generals
58:52
general mark milley being the most clear example and this is someone who sabotaged the afghan withdrawal who
59:00
actually was on the streets in dc in june 2020
59:05
walking around trying to please trump calling for dominating the battle space against black lives matter and then you
59:12
know he starts when biden comes in he wants to please biden so he says that he supports critical race theory because he
59:19
wants to know how the the neo the neo-nazis or the white supremacists who are somehow infesting the military
59:26
actually think uh which is infuriated a lot of the old guard and
59:32
people in the military .................

but i mean you look at you look at where the part of the pentagon is going
59:39
it's appeasing the dominant liberal uh the dominant liberal faction in washington right now and what does the
59:46
DOMINANT LIBERAL FACTION want to do and who are they well they're CHICKEN HAWKS they're soft-handed chicken hawks who
59:51
want to they believe in this wilsonian idea of EXPORTING VALUES and so THEIR OBSESSION WITH RUSSIA
59:58
really goes to something that COL DOUG MACGREGOR has said which is that
1:00:03
RUSSIA IS SEEN is seen in washington particularly by those forces as a BASTION OF CONSERVATISM and so they're
1:00:10
fighting this kind of GLOBAL CULTURE WAR by REFUSING TO NEGOTIATE WITH PUTIN ......


or NOT TELLING Zelinski look just go to the
1:00:16
table and we'll help you rebuild ukraine just end end the war INSTEAD They're flooding it with WEAPONS because they want to FIGHT the CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING WHITE MENANCE IN MOSCOW there and i mean i've talked
1:00:29
to those KINDS OF PEOPLE around THINK TANKS think tanks in washington like i know how they think it's VERY VERY DANGEROUS that was
1:00:35
also the NEOCONSERVATIVE POSITION in the first BUSH TERM about EXPORTING VALUES against the the islamists the radical ISLAMIC BACKWARDS CONSERVATIVES by bringing remember when REVLON was
1:00:48
brought into afghanistan it was either revlon or um another makeup company and they set up
1:00:53
an office in kabul or a salon in kabul to bring makeup to afghan women it's
1:00:59
that same [FUCKED UP ARROGANT EGOTISTICAL HUBRIS ] MENTALITY .................

and you know he mentioned that william burns the cia director
1:01:05
is the only person in the administration who is pushing back on this perspective
1:01:12
actually we interviewed ray mcgovern when burns was first nominated and he said he would be the only sensible
1:01:18
person in the biden administration but it looks like he's taken a back seat


1:01:24
you know just compare someone like colonel mcgregor to say SAMANTHA POWER

yeah the power is a perfect example so
1:01:30
samantha power right in her rhetoric she would NEVER DEMONIZE REFUGEES say anything uh
1:01:36
bigoted about them but HER POLICIES versus someone like mcgregor would CREATE MILLIONS OF REFUGEES whereas the
1:01:43
NON-INTERVENTIONISTS like mcgregor would not and that's WHAT GETS MISSED HERE

we are we're dominated right now we're run
1:01:49
by people who have the right rhetoric they say the right things but their actual POLICIES are responsible for so much CARNAGE whether it's in UKRAINE right now by using ukraine as cannon fodder or in
1:02:01
SYRIA you know um where there was just been there's been a dirty war for the last uh decade and that was started
1:02:08
under OBAMA just as the coup in ukraine was also started under OBAMA

ADD IN VENEZUEALA, CENTRAL AMERICA, YEMEN, BURMA, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, LIBYA, AND MORE .......



Yeah we well samantha power was actually
1:02:17
SILENT ON YEMEN for her entire time in the obama administration when her job
1:02:23
they created a special FAKE JOB for her as some kind of HUMAN RIGHTS CZAR
1:02:30
and until she was appointed UN Ambassador where her job was to basically SCREAM AT VITALE CHURKIN
1:02:36
because russia and syria were being TOO MEAN TO AL QUEDA IN EAST ALLEPPO and she compared it to like SREBRENICA IN BOSNIA
1:02:42
and like said this was going to be the she called it GENOCIDE and then when east aleppo was cleared
1:02:47
out she just WAS SILENT BECAUSE THERE WASN'T ANY EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE ...

but the point is samantha power [AND LIKE HER THEY ] loves dirty wars she loves bombing brown people

SERIOUSLY LOOK LISTEN ....


1:03:06
uh on that that that that incident i think people sorry i'm going off on samantha power so
1:03:12
much but i you know SHE'S one of the MOST REPELLENT FIGURES
1:03:18
in this whole this WHOLE INTERVENTIONIST THEATRE [ SCAM ] because she was actually on a tour i
1:03:24
think it was Cameroon with her convoy to basically mop up the damage from
1:03:31
LIBYA ....

PEOPLE people don't realize that um but the reason she was there was to meet
1:03:37
with young women who had been captured by boko haram remember the bring back our girls campaign and michelle obama
1:03:43
with her sad face holding the card with the hashtag the girls had been kidnapped by boko haram because boko haram was able to
1:03:50
advance all across africa into northern nigeria
1:03:56
because it had BENEFITTED FROM THE LOOTED ARMS DEPOTS IN LIBYA that
1:04:01
were opened by the libyan intervention that samantha power was a key advocate for .......

so samantha power was just virtue SIGNALLING instead of cleaning up HER OWN MESS [AND HILLARY CLINTONS / OBAMAS / BIDENS ] SO that's the DAMAGE THAT these kind
1:04:14
of LIBERAL INTERVENTIONS HAVE DONE [ AND BOMBING IN YEMEN / AFGHANISTAN / PAKISTAN ] and they're there again preventing any negotiation over this because PUTIN is
1:04:21
their new BIG BAD WHITE CONSERVATIVE ENEMY -- it's like that they see him as interchangeable with trump as part of this
GLOBAL CULTURE WAR [ BACKED IN BY SOCIAL MEDIA CRAP AND USA OLIGARCHS -- FACEBOOK TESLA GOOGLE AMAZON TWITTER MSM CORPORATE MEDIA OLIGARCHS N CELEBRITY SHILLS ..... NYTs WASHINGTON POST LA TIMES CHICAGO TRIBUNE -- MSNBC CNN ABC CBS DISNEY SONY NETFLIX --- PLUS CONGRESS -- THINK TANKS -- PUSSY HATS -- BLM - ALL OF THEM ]

1:04:28
and they cannot look at anything RATIONALLY that's what RUSSIA-GATE WAS ABOUT for so many
1:04:35
of these people in addition to as the late STEPHEN COHEN said CRIMINALIZING
1:04:40
DIPLOMACY making it impossible for TRUMP to actually
1:04:45
negotiate something that would have HEADED OFF THIS WAR ......

[ BUT OF COURSE TRUMP WAS AN IDIOT WAY OUT OF HIS DEPTH ... LIKE ZELENSKY ... JUST TV PERSONALITY -- A MORON ]

PS RUSSIA GATE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD .....
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 13:08:03 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 23:58:48 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:


THIS BIT IS A FUCKING BRILLIANT SUMMARY .....

AARON MATE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

1:04:52
i go back to that uh phone call that was intercepted between victoria nuland and jeffrey piatt the
1:04:58
u.s ambassador to ukraine in january 2014 just weeks before the coup
1:05:04
and they talk about how their plan to install a new ukrainian government it needs an attaboy and they specifically
1:05:11
reference joe biden and jake sullivan and now job it's like joe biden and jake
1:05:16
sullivan are now back to essentially pick up where they left off which is
1:05:21
using ukraine as cannon fighter against russia dangling the prospect of nato membership
1:05:27
and these are the people biden and jake sullivan who are now running policy the people who essentially helped start this
1:05:34
crisis who have as much responsibility as anyone along with victoria nuland who was
1:05:40
now the person on the ground carrying out this coup policy for them and now they're the ones in charge
1:05:45
and mcgregor mentioned that bill burns is a voice of dissent and you know he was he was the author of that cable
1:05:51
warning about nato expansion to ukraine being a red line for russia this was back in 2008
1:05:57
but now burns is there in the cia and you know he seems to be carrying out the biden administration's policy yeah so
1:06:04
it's certainly the only sort of line that biden will not cross is world war three but short of that i mean these people
1:06:11
obviously want to stoke an insurgency inside of ukraine that could bleed
1:06:16
russia that was what hillary clinton laid out on tv a few weeks ago when she went on rachel maddow so i'm just
1:06:22
wondering if they're going to back off from that now that's fantastical it feels fantastical especially after the
1:06:28
attack on the foreign mercenary base that um the idea that an insurgency could
1:06:34
take place with the russian military present i mean it was the insurgency in
1:06:39
syria that was immediately crushed by the russian intervention yeah uh there's no
1:06:45
well the rat line would be through poland poland is not erdogan's turkey the russian military is not the syrian
1:06:51
army which was just basically being um pounded and in some cases encircled
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 13:14:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
THIS BIT IS A FUCKING BRILLIANT SUMMARY .....
AARON MATE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
1:04:52
i go back to that uh phone call that was intercepted between victoria nuland and jeffrey piatt the
1:04:58
u.s ambassador to ukraine in january 2014 just weeks before the coup
1:05:04
and they talk about how their plan to install a new ukrainian government it needs an attaboy and they specifically
1:05:11
reference joe biden and jake sullivan and now job it's like joe biden and jake
1:05:16
sullivan are now back to essentially pick up where they left off which is
1:05:21
using ukraine as cannon fighter against russia dangling the prospect of nato membership
1:05:27
and these are the people biden and jake sullivan who are now running policy the people who essentially helped start this
1:05:34
crisis who have as much responsibility as anyone along with victoria nuland who was
1:05:40
now the person on the ground carrying out this coup policy for them and now they're the ones in charge
1:05:45
and mcgregor mentioned that bill burns is a voice of dissent and you know he was he was the author of that cable
1:05:51
warning about nato expansion to ukraine being a red line for russia this was back in 2008
1:05:57
but now burns is there in the cia and you know he seems to be carrying out the biden administration's policy yeah so
1:06:04
it's certainly the only sort of line that biden will not cross is world war three but short of that i mean these people
1:06:11
obviously want to stoke an insurgency inside of ukraine that could bleed
1:06:16
russia that was what hillary clinton laid out on tv a few weeks ago when she went on rachel maddow so i'm just
1:06:22
wondering if they're going to back off from that now that's fantastical it feels fantastical especially after the
1:06:28
attack on the foreign mercenary base that um the idea that an insurgency could
1:06:34
take place with the russian military present i mean it was the insurgency in
1:06:39
syria that was immediately crushed by the russian intervention yeah uh there's no
1:06:45
well the rat line would be through poland poland is not erdogan's turkey the russian military is not the syrian
1:06:51
army which was just basically being um pounded and in some cases encircled
THANKFULLY THERE ARE SOME AMERICANS WHO ARE NOT IDIOTS OR EVIL LYING TWISTED CUNTS .... EG


1:07:40
and said no we are not going to allow what effectively will be a genocide in the encirclement of damascus and that
1:07:47
was the end of it so that that and that really i think informed the thinking on
1:07:52
what was happening ahead of the invasion not this is not a justification but
1:07:58
basically me recapitulating what i know which was interviewing russell bentley u.s
1:08:05
uh you know an american citizen a texan who relocated to donex fought with the nova
1:08:10
russian army and we've interviewed him several times i interviewed him two days before the russian intervention in
1:08:16
ukraine and he told me that ukrainian forces that were staging a massive escalation that they had not seen before
1:08:22
grad rockets were hitting civilian buildings schools a hospital was hit and people were alarmed the duma
1:08:30
report that was subsequently released by russia by the russian government
1:08:36
asserted that the ukrainian military was planning a massive offensive again against donetsk and lugansk and putin
1:08:42
has referred to it as genocidal certainly the azov battalion and the ultra-nationalist forces have a
1:08:48
genocidal mentality towards the ethnic russian population so that informed the thinking
1:08:54
there as well and colonel mcgregor referenced that
1:08:59
so i think what we're seeing is very similar to what we saw in syria
1:09:05
but on a much more massive scale and the u.s pundits the kind of like orenta
1:09:11
generals you'll see on msnbc they don't underst i don't think they understand the russian military strategy
1:09:17
that's another reason why i wanted to bring colonel mcgregor on they think that russia really wants to
1:09:23
go into kiev and reduce the city to rubble and you know while that
1:09:28
i guess is not completely off the table uh the strategy really was to encircle
1:09:34
the ukrainian military its best units which were always in the east pounding donetsk and luhansk
1:09:40
to negotiate their retreat then crush the nationalist units as of idah these
1:09:46
kind of paramilitaries incorporated into the national guard basically liquidate them
1:09:51
and that's what we're seeing there with the encirclement in the east and to cut kiev off
1:09:58
and take mariupol which is the base of the azov battalion they took that city in 2014 and have had total control of it
1:10:06
then you you're seeing the civilian corridors that's what we saw in syria as well i remember driving on the highway
1:10:14
uh east of damascus um actually sorry um going through ghouta towards the
1:10:21
lebanese border uh through duma through all of these suburbs that had
1:10:26
been reduced to rubble during the fierce fighting with so many of these um
1:10:32
so-called moderate rebels but specifically j shell islam the most ferocious saudi-backed group and hearing
1:10:38
people describe to me who are from these areas that there were civilian corridors but
1:10:44
jay shall islam and the al-rahman brigade sponsored by qatar was trying to prevent the
1:10:49
civilians from getting out and would actually snipe at them to prevent them from getting out because that was their collateral
1:10:56
in other words human shields um to prevent more ferocious attacks and so
1:11:01
we're seeing the civilian corridors being sabotaged uh but that's part of the russian strategy is to get civilians
1:11:08
out through the corridors then negotiate the demise of these various
1:11:14
factions and uh it seems to be happening it happened
1:11:19
much slower than i think the russian military wanted but it seems to be happening and then the lesson of aleppo
1:11:27
uh was just very clear to get just get everyone out
1:11:34
weak prevent the con the weapons from coming in and then uh bring in your military police uh do
1:11:42
kind of counter insurgency bring in aid trucks and so on and do your pr
1:11:47
operation that's where i think things are going uh i don't think that's well understood in washington and the whole
1:11:52
point is to sabotage it by sending in weapons


THE WORLDS MEDIA ARE COMPLICIT BLOW HARDS ..... A POX ON ALL THEIR HOUSES
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 13:25:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
THIS BIT IS A FUCKING BRILLIANT SUMMARY .....
AARON MATE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
1:04:52
i go back to that uh phone call that was intercepted between victoria nuland and jeffrey piatt the
1:04:58
u.s ambassador to ukraine in january 2014 just weeks before the coup
1:05:04
and they talk about how their plan to install a new ukrainian government it needs an attaboy and they specifically
1:05:11
reference joe biden and jake sullivan and now job it's like joe biden and jake
1:05:16
sullivan are now back to essentially pick up where they left off which is
1:05:21
using ukraine as cannon fighter against russia dangling the prospect of nato membership
1:05:27
and these are the people biden and jake sullivan who are now running policy the people who essentially helped start this
1:05:34
crisis who have as much responsibility as anyone along with victoria nuland who was
1:05:40
now the person on the ground carrying out this coup policy for them and now they're the ones in charge
1:05:45
and mcgregor mentioned that bill burns is a voice of dissent and you know he was he was the author of that cable
1:05:51
warning about nato expansion to ukraine being a red line for russia this was back in 2008
1:05:57
but now burns is there in the cia and you know he seems to be carrying out the biden administration's policy yeah so
1:06:04
it's certainly the only sort of line that biden will not cross is world war three but short of that i mean these people
1:06:11
obviously want to stoke an insurgency inside of ukraine that could bleed
1:06:16
russia that was what hillary clinton laid out on tv a few weeks ago when she went on rachel maddow so i'm just
1:06:22
wondering if they're going to back off from that now that's fantastical it feels fantastical especially after the
1:06:28
attack on the foreign mercenary base that um the idea that an insurgency could
1:06:34
take place with the russian military present i mean it was the insurgency in
1:06:39
syria that was immediately crushed by the russian intervention yeah uh there's no
1:06:45
well the rat line would be through poland poland is not erdogan's turkey the russian military is not the syrian
1:06:51
army which was just basically being um pounded and in some cases encircled
THANKFULLY THERE ARE SOME AMERICANS WHO ARE NOT IDIOTS OR EVIL LYING TWISTED CUNTS .... EG
1:07:40
and said no we are not going to allow what effectively will be a genocide in the encirclement of damascus and that
1:07:47
was the end of it so that that and that really i think informed the thinking on
1:07:52
what was happening ahead of the invasion not this is not a justification but
1:07:58
basically me recapitulating what i know which was interviewing russell bentley u.s
1:08:05
uh you know an american citizen a texan who relocated to donex fought with the nova
1:08:10
russian army and we've interviewed him several times i interviewed him two days before the russian intervention in
1:08:16
ukraine and he told me that ukrainian forces that were staging a massive escalation that they had not seen before
1:08:22
grad rockets were hitting civilian buildings schools a hospital was hit and people were alarmed the duma
1:08:30
report that was subsequently released by russia by the russian government
1:08:36
asserted that the ukrainian military was planning a massive offensive again against donetsk and lugansk and putin
1:08:42
has referred to it as genocidal certainly the azov battalion and the ultra-nationalist forces have a
1:08:48
genocidal mentality towards the ethnic russian population so that informed the thinking
1:08:54
there as well and colonel mcgregor referenced that
1:08:59
so i think what we're seeing is very similar to what we saw in syria
1:09:05
but on a much more massive scale and the u.s pundits the kind of like orenta
1:09:11
generals you'll see on msnbc they don't underst i don't think they understand the russian military strategy
1:09:17
that's another reason why i wanted to bring colonel mcgregor on they think that russia really wants to
1:09:23
go into kiev and reduce the city to rubble and you know while that
1:09:28
i guess is not completely off the table uh the strategy really was to encircle
1:09:34
the ukrainian military its best units which were always in the east pounding donetsk and luhansk
1:09:40
to negotiate their retreat then crush the nationalist units as of idah these
1:09:46
kind of paramilitaries incorporated into the national guard basically liquidate them
1:09:51
and that's what we're seeing there with the encirclement in the east and to cut kiev off
1:09:58
and take mariupol which is the base of the azov battalion they took that city in 2014 and have had total control of it
1:10:06
then you you're seeing the civilian corridors that's what we saw in syria as well i remember driving on the highway
1:10:14
uh east of damascus um actually sorry um going through ghouta towards the
1:10:21
lebanese border uh through duma through all of these suburbs that had
1:10:26
been reduced to rubble during the fierce fighting with so many of these um
1:10:32
so-called moderate rebels but specifically j shell islam the most ferocious saudi-backed group and hearing
1:10:38
people describe to me who are from these areas that there were civilian corridors but
1:10:44
jay shall islam and the al-rahman brigade sponsored by qatar was trying to prevent the
1:10:49
civilians from getting out and would actually snipe at them to prevent them from getting out because that was their collateral
1:10:56
in other words human shields um to prevent more ferocious attacks and so
1:11:01
we're seeing the civilian corridors being sabotaged uh but that's part of the russian strategy is to get civilians
1:11:08
out through the corridors then negotiate the demise of these various
1:11:14
factions and uh it seems to be happening it happened
1:11:19
much slower than i think the russian military wanted but it seems to be happening and then the lesson of aleppo
1:11:27
uh was just very clear to get just get everyone out
1:11:34
weak prevent the con the weapons from coming in and then uh bring in your military police uh do
1:11:42
kind of counter insurgency bring in aid trucks and so on and do your pr
1:11:47
operation that's where i think things are going uh i don't think that's well understood in washington and the whole
1:11:52
point is to sabotage it by sending in weapons
THE WORLDS MEDIA ARE COMPLICIT BLOW HARDS ..... A POX ON ALL THEIR HOUSES
THESE GUYS ARE GOOD .. THEY SHOULD BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE ....


1:17:15
it's a really important point that you made about um zelinski at the
1:17:20
munich security conference um which you know was also graced by the presence of the young turks who are
1:17:27
there to uh provide pr services to nato ministers
1:17:32
while there were massive anti-war protests outside um
1:17:37
zielinski was puffing out his chest and really appealing to the crowd there
1:17:44
and what he said was that he regretted that the ukrainian government in 1994
1:17:50
signed the budapest memorandum which was going to
1:17:56
take the soviet era nuclear weapons away for disposal or storage
1:18:02
and provide ukraine with fuel rods and all of the infrastructure it needed to maintain civilian nuclear
1:18:09
reactors and to power the country and so this was a move towards peace that he denounced
1:18:16
because he thought that if ukraine had kept nuclear weapons then it would have had deterrent capacity against russia to
1:18:22
essentially tell russia you know you want to come in here while we're joining nato we will nuke moscow
1:18:28
that isn't a bonkers statement to make and it feels like he was set up to make
1:18:35
it i mean who is zelinski everybody watching this knows who zelinski is
1:18:41
he's just playing a role he's inhabiting a role and his initial role in 2019 was
1:18:46
to make peace but he soon found that was impossible he was pressured on two sides by the ultra
1:18:54
nationalists the neo-nazis the hardliners and the u.s and so now here he is the
1:19:01
war president getting a massive reception at munich he's loving his new role and so he's calling for nuclear
1:19:06
weapons i think that definitely set off alarm bells in moscow and helped incite
1:19:13
russia to invade and the natoization of ukraine goes beyond all these agreements that have
1:19:20
been been made between the west between washington and ukraine
1:19:26
to the insertion and constant cycling through of thousands of u.s military
1:19:31
personnel including trainers who have worked hand in glove with the azov battalion i mean
1:19:37
it's not hard to find photos of us military trainers like high level officers palling around with the azov
1:19:44
battalion a u.s patch here and a nazi wolf's angle patch on the other arm
1:19:51
the 200 million dollars authorized in december by the biden administration for new weapons new offensive weapons
1:19:58
remember under um obama and trump but especially under obama when offensive weapons to ukraine were
1:20:04
controversial and obama didn't want to give them and now it's like it just became
1:20:10
imperative under biden so the thinking in washington was
1:20:16
in the in the biden administration at least among that crazy set in the in the state department
1:20:22
the newlands and blinkens was that russia was never going to do anything of
1:20:27
substance to counter the natoization of ukraine so why stop because we've wanted to do that since the wolfowitz doctrine
1:20:34
and the first bush administration that's where these people come from they come from that mindset of
1:20:40
um you know the project for a new american century mindset of total unipolar us
1:20:46
domination and ukraine is really the capstone if you can get ukraine and nato
1:20:52
you've done it you've dominated russia and you're just going to start pushing forward towards the balkanization of
1:20:57
russia that's what that's how i think they were thinking until they got smashed in the face and as mike
1:21:03
tyson said you know you always have a plan until you get hit in the face
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 13:31:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
THIS BIT IS A FUCKING BRILLIANT SUMMARY .....
AARON MATE
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
1:04:52
i go back to that uh phone call that was intercepted between victoria nuland and jeffrey piatt the
1:04:58
u.s ambassador to ukraine in january 2014 just weeks before the coup
1:05:04
and they talk about how their plan to install a new ukrainian government it needs an attaboy and they specifically
1:05:11
reference joe biden and jake sullivan and now job it's like joe biden and jake
1:05:16
sullivan are now back to essentially pick up where they left off which is
1:05:21
using ukraine as cannon fighter against russia dangling the prospect of nato membership
1:05:27
and these are the people biden and jake sullivan who are now running policy the people who essentially helped start this
1:05:34
crisis who have as much responsibility as anyone along with victoria nuland who was
1:05:40
now the person on the ground carrying out this coup policy for them and now they're the ones in charge
1:05:45
and mcgregor mentioned that bill burns is a voice of dissent and you know he was he was the author of that cable
1:05:51
warning about nato expansion to ukraine being a red line for russia this was back in 2008
1:05:57
but now burns is there in the cia and you know he seems to be carrying out the biden administration's policy yeah so
1:06:04
it's certainly the only sort of line that biden will not cross is world war three but short of that i mean these people
1:06:11
obviously want to stoke an insurgency inside of ukraine that could bleed
1:06:16
russia that was what hillary clinton laid out on tv a few weeks ago when she went on rachel maddow so i'm just
1:06:22
wondering if they're going to back off from that now that's fantastical it feels fantastical especially after the
1:06:28
attack on the foreign mercenary base that um the idea that an insurgency could
1:06:34
take place with the russian military present i mean it was the insurgency in
1:06:39
syria that was immediately crushed by the russian intervention yeah uh there's no
1:06:45
well the rat line would be through poland poland is not erdogan's turkey the russian military is not the syrian
1:06:51
army which was just basically being um pounded and in some cases encircled
THANKFULLY THERE ARE SOME AMERICANS WHO ARE NOT IDIOTS OR EVIL LYING TWISTED CUNTS .... EG
1:07:40
and said no we are not going to allow what effectively will be a genocide in the encirclement of damascus and that
1:07:47
was the end of it so that that and that really i think informed the thinking on
1:07:52
what was happening ahead of the invasion not this is not a justification but
1:07:58
basically me recapitulating what i know which was interviewing russell bentley u.s
1:08:05
uh you know an american citizen a texan who relocated to donex fought with the nova
1:08:10
russian army and we've interviewed him several times i interviewed him two days before the russian intervention in
1:08:16
ukraine and he told me that ukrainian forces that were staging a massive escalation that they had not seen before
1:08:22
grad rockets were hitting civilian buildings schools a hospital was hit and people were alarmed the duma
1:08:30
report that was subsequently released by russia by the russian government
1:08:36
asserted that the ukrainian military was planning a massive offensive again against donetsk and lugansk and putin
1:08:42
has referred to it as genocidal certainly the azov battalion and the ultra-nationalist forces have a
1:08:48
genocidal mentality towards the ethnic russian population so that informed the thinking
1:08:54
there as well and colonel mcgregor referenced that
1:08:59
so i think what we're seeing is very similar to what we saw in syria
1:09:05
but on a much more massive scale and the u.s pundits the kind of like orenta
1:09:11
generals you'll see on msnbc they don't underst i don't think they understand the russian military strategy
1:09:17
that's another reason why i wanted to bring colonel mcgregor on they think that russia really wants to
1:09:23
go into kiev and reduce the city to rubble and you know while that
1:09:28
i guess is not completely off the table uh the strategy really was to encircle
1:09:34
the ukrainian military its best units which were always in the east pounding donetsk and luhansk
1:09:40
to negotiate their retreat then crush the nationalist units as of idah these
1:09:46
kind of paramilitaries incorporated into the national guard basically liquidate them
1:09:51
and that's what we're seeing there with the encirclement in the east and to cut kiev off
1:09:58
and take mariupol which is the base of the azov battalion they took that city in 2014 and have had total control of it
1:10:06
then you you're seeing the civilian corridors that's what we saw in syria as well i remember driving on the highway
1:10:14
uh east of damascus um actually sorry um going through ghouta towards the
1:10:21
lebanese border uh through duma through all of these suburbs that had
1:10:26
been reduced to rubble during the fierce fighting with so many of these um
1:10:32
so-called moderate rebels but specifically j shell islam the most ferocious saudi-backed group and hearing
1:10:38
people describe to me who are from these areas that there were civilian corridors but
1:10:44
jay shall islam and the al-rahman brigade sponsored by qatar was trying to prevent the
1:10:49
civilians from getting out and would actually snipe at them to prevent them from getting out because that was their collateral
1:10:56
in other words human shields um to prevent more ferocious attacks and so
1:11:01
we're seeing the civilian corridors being sabotaged uh but that's part of the russian strategy is to get civilians
1:11:08
out through the corridors then negotiate the demise of these various
1:11:14
factions and uh it seems to be happening it happened
1:11:19
much slower than i think the russian military wanted but it seems to be happening and then the lesson of aleppo
1:11:27
uh was just very clear to get just get everyone out
1:11:34
weak prevent the con the weapons from coming in and then uh bring in your military police uh do
1:11:42
kind of counter insurgency bring in aid trucks and so on and do your pr
1:11:47
operation that's where i think things are going uh i don't think that's well understood in washington and the whole
1:11:52
point is to sabotage it by sending in weapons
THE WORLDS MEDIA ARE COMPLICIT BLOW HARDS ..... A POX ON ALL THEIR HOUSES
THESE GUYS ARE GOOD .. THEY SHOULD BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE ....
1:17:15
it's a really important point that you made about um zelinski at the
1:17:20
munich security conference um which you know was also graced by the presence of the young turks who are
1:17:27
there to uh provide pr services to nato ministers
1:17:32
while there were massive anti-war protests outside um
1:17:37
zielinski was puffing out his chest and really appealing to the crowd there
1:17:44
and what he said was that he regretted that the ukrainian government in 1994
1:17:50
signed the budapest memorandum which was going to
1:17:56
take the soviet era nuclear weapons away for disposal or storage
1:18:02
and provide ukraine with fuel rods and all of the infrastructure it needed to maintain civilian nuclear
1:18:09
reactors and to power the country and so this was a move towards peace that he denounced
1:18:16
because he thought that if ukraine had kept nuclear weapons then it would have had deterrent capacity against russia to
1:18:22
essentially tell russia you know you want to come in here while we're joining nato we will nuke moscow
1:18:28
that isn't a bonkers statement to make and it feels like he was set up to make
1:18:35
it i mean who is zelinski everybody watching this knows who zelinski is
1:18:41
he's just playing a role he's inhabiting a role and his initial role in 2019 was
1:18:46
to make peace but he soon found that was impossible he was pressured on two sides by the ultra
1:18:54
nationalists the neo-nazis the hardliners and the u.s and so now here he is the
1:19:01
war president getting a massive reception at munich he's loving his new role and so he's calling for nuclear
1:19:06
weapons i think that definitely set off alarm bells in moscow and helped incite
1:19:13
russia to invade and the natoization of ukraine goes beyond all these agreements that have
1:19:20
been been made between the west between washington and ukraine
1:19:26
to the insertion and constant cycling through of thousands of u.s military
1:19:31
personnel including trainers who have worked hand in glove with the azov battalion i mean
1:19:37
it's not hard to find photos of us military trainers like high level officers palling around with the azov
1:19:44
battalion a u.s patch here and a nazi wolf's angle patch on the other arm
1:19:51
the 200 million dollars authorized in december by the biden administration for new weapons new offensive weapons
1:19:58
remember under um obama and trump but especially under obama when offensive weapons to ukraine were
1:20:04
controversial and obama didn't want to give them and now it's like it just became
1:20:10
imperative under biden so the thinking in washington was
1:20:16
in the in the biden administration at least among that crazy set in the in the state department
1:20:22
the newlands and blinkens was that russia was never going to do anything of
1:20:27
substance to counter the natoization of ukraine so why stop because we've wanted to do that since the wolfowitz doctrine
1:20:34
and the first bush administration that's where these people come from they come from that mindset of
1:20:40
um you know the project for a new american century mindset of total unipolar us
1:20:46
domination and ukraine is really the capstone if you can get ukraine and nato
1:20:52
you've done it you've dominated russia and you're just going to start pushing forward towards the balkanization of
1:20:57
russia that's what that's how i think they were thinking until they got smashed in the face and as mike
1:21:03
tyson said you know you always have a plan until you get hit in the face
AARON RETORTS ....


1:21:08
you know on that point about obama refusing to send more arms to ukraine after he realized
1:21:14
what he had gotten into by launching the coup and starting a proxy war on the donbass let me quote you from uh the
1:21:20
memoir of a former senior pentagon official served under obama derek sholet who says this when it comes
1:21:28
to obama's decision not to send arms to ukraine despite everybody including joe biden and
1:21:33
blinking and jake sullivan pressuring too chola writes this quote this was one of the few occasions i can recall in the
1:21:40
obama administration in which just about every senior official was for doing
1:21:45
something that the president opposed so that's the one few areas where we can give obama some credit and that
1:21:51
everybody from biden to blink into sullivan were telling him to send more weapons to ukraine and he refused to do
1:21:57
it and the reason is obvious and was reported on at the time he didn't want to further inflame a proxy war that he
1:22:02
started and he especially did not want us weapons to get into the hands of neo-nazis and
1:22:08
other far-right militants inside ukraine all of those concerns have since been discarded with obama's exit from office
1:22:15
began under trump when trump was pressured into sending weapons to ukraine and the bite administration
1:22:20
has escalated that and on the point about neo-nazis max i i wanted to ask you about the recent piece you did with alex
1:22:27
rubenstein at the gray zone i was recently going back and watching my old interviews with stephen f cohen
1:22:32
the late russia scholar where by the way he predicts everything that has happened and one of the things he said to me um
1:22:38
in an interview in the fall of 2019 when trump was being impeached for pausing weapon sales to ukraine and adam schiff
1:22:45
was declaring this was a grave national security threat to the u.s because in his words we have to
1:22:52
fight russia over there so that we don't have to fight them here and one of the things that dr cohen said
1:22:57
was that neo-nazis in ukraine far-right forces are putting
1:23:03
a lot of pressure on zolensky to abandon his campaign platform of making peace with russia of ending the war in the donbas
1:23:10
and cohen said that if the us does not stand up for zelinski uh and and uh
1:23:16
basically tell the far right and ukraine to fall back then they're going to win out because there's no countervailing
1:23:22
force to the ukrainian far right except for the us and so he says only the u.s can essentially prevent
1:23:27
catastrophe and save zalenski's peace mandate well of course we know what the u.s did they just continued to pump
1:23:34
weapons into ukraine and did nothing to pressure zelensky and give him a stronger hand to actually
1:23:39
implement the minsk accords and that takes us to you know this war and your article
1:23:44
which was headlined how ukraine's jewish president zielenski made peace with neo-nazi paramilitaries on front lines
1:23:52
of the war with russia so really i fought the u.s for the fact that zelinski had to abandon his campaign
1:23:59
platform because who else was going to be there to be a countervailing force to the far right inside ukraine


I ALREADY KNEW THIS SHIT WAS TRUE, WAS WHAT HAPPENED ..... WHERE ARE THE CORRUPT JOURNALISTS IN THE CORRUPT MEDIA?

I'VE SEEN VIDEOS OF ZELENSKI BEING DEFIED BY RIGHT WING NAZI MILITAS ON THE GROUND IN EAST UKRAINE REFUSING TO DO WHAT HE WANTED ... IN 2019 ZELENSKI HAD TO GIVE UP OR BE ASSASSINATED BY THEM ..

WHAT THESE GUYS SAY IS THE FUCKING TRUTH ....
Henosis Sage
2022-03-18 23:45:22 UTC
Permalink
On Saturday, 19 March 2022 at 00:31:57 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:

continuing the copy/paste [rave]

nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW

ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....


1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet

so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here

uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant

and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure

actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic

THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST

YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 00:25:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
continuing the copy/paste [rave]
nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW
ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....
1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet
so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here
uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant
and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure
actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic
THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST
YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
ON GEORGE SOROS [AND WESTERN/JEWISH OLIGARCHS LIKE HIM ]
WHO FUNDED ZELENSKI INTO OFFICE IN 2019 & THE AZOV BATTALION MOVEMENT ????

Q--
max one thing i want to ask you uh colonel mcgregor mentioned george soros
1:28:46
in the context of ukraine and often when we hear george soros's name
1:28:51
they can come in the form of either you know anti-semitic conspiracy theories or they also can come
1:28:57
in the realm of uh real things and so in the case of ukraine
1:29:02
has soros had an influence in terms of manufacturing uh the uh the REGIME
1:29:08
CHANGE operation that happened in 2014 and other related efforts to basically turn ukraine into a NATO Colony

A ---
1:29:15
well definitely i mean you know the answer to that i mean right now the big player in ukraine
1:29:22
would be zielinski's money man igor kolomoisky who's one of the MOST CORRUPT MEN on the planet funded
1:29:28
zielinski while he funded the azov battalion uh basically funded zielinski's career
1:29:34
through these shell accounts that showed up in the PANDORA PAPERS and still is wielding influence i would assume over
1:29:41
negotiations

but uh soros i mean when did he last kind of turn up in the news it was
1:29:47
JUST BEFORE the Russian operation in ukraine during another event that the world's
1:29:54
eyes were focused on which was the winter OLYMPICS in beijing and he used that occasion to call for REGIME CHANGE
1:30:00
in BEIJING CHINA and the DIOWNFALL of xi jinping so that's i mean he just he's
1:30:07
just out there saying it !!!!!!!!!!!!

GEORGE SOROS s i think the main funder of the new york
1:30:14
review of books which is the um the literary political review of the
1:30:21
bien penson liberal intelligentsia in new york and he whenever he wants he can write an
1:30:27
article there and every time he does IT'S TO CALL FOR REGIME CHANGE IN A NEW PLACE

i remember he said you know it's
1:30:32
really important that we have regime change in SYRIA in order to STOP PUTIN

He wrote a piece prior to that declaring
1:30:38
that PUTIN WAS WORSE THAN ISIS TERRORISTS He's been OBSSESSED and what does
1:30:43
do well he is one of the OVERT OPERATORS identified in the 1991 washington post
1:30:50
column by david ignatius who's one of the CIA'S KIND OF FAVOURITE CHANNELS IN US MEDIA
1:30:57
one of the overt operators DOING THE WORK THE CIA USED TO DO COVERTLY IN THE OPEN
1:31:03
ignatius also identified the national endowment for democracy uh he you know uh he gave a pat on the back to the
1:31:09
afl-cio i would call the afl-cia which is now clamoring for SANCTIONS ON
1:31:15
RUSSIAN WORKERS and all of these other channels for SOFT POWER and u.s influence
1:31:22


and he foreshadowed in that column the the coming COLOR REVOLUTIONS
1:31:27
uh that would TOPPLE GOVERNMENTS that were still friendly or maintain good diplomatic
1:31:33
TIES WITH RUSSIA after the soviet union the first one was uh edward shevandartzi the former foreign minister to
1:31:39
mikhail gorbachev who was president of GEORGIA and his replacement with the CIA ASSETT ultimately mikhail sakashvili who
1:31:47
led georgia into direct military confrontation with russia over south ossetia [[ LATER GOVERNOR OF ODESSA UNDER POROSHENKO UKRAINE GOVT - A CIA / NATO SHILL NUT CASE ]


1:31:53
SOROS is funding the civil society groups through his open societies foundations as an overt operator he's funding the
1:32:01
young people who you know getting them like they'll come out in in us in a town square in tibilisi or kiev and they all show up in
1:32:08
the same color pancho you know it's someone like soros WHO'S PAYING for that along with the
1:32:14
OPPOSITION MEDIA [ UKRAINES CURRENT GLOBAL PR PROPAGANDA OPERATION IN THE MEDIA ??? ]

we saw a outlet called romanski if you're watching it's spelled
1:32:20
h-r-o-m-a-d-s-k-e if you want to look it up this cropped up over popped up overnight
1:32:27
to support the MAIDAN uh so-called revolution of dignity the coup attempt in 2013 2014 and it was
1:32:34
sponsored by soros and also pierre omidyar which is really interesting because you know he controls the
1:32:40
INTERCEPT MEDIA OUTLET [ THAT GREENWALD QUIT IN DISGUST ] and they're writing about ukraine without acknowledging that THEIR FUNDER / OWNER HAD A DIRECT HAND IN
1:32:47
THE UKRAINE COUP OF 2014 that took us to where we are TODAY

so that's why i think GEORGE SOROS is such a
1:32:53
is considered THE DEVIL EVERYWHERE from hungary to russia and all of these laws
1:32:59
are introduced TO BAN NGOS -- HRW human rights watch being the largest ngo that uh
1:33:04
SOROS FUNDS and then the west counters and says oh they're anti-democratic they're trying to ban human rights
1:33:10
groups they won't allow a civil society and ANY CRITICISM OF SOROS is deemed ANTI-SEMITIC [ HOW CONVENIENT IS THAT ? ]


1:33:17
so i'm sure everyone watching kind of knew that history you knew the answer to your
1:33:22
own question but i'm glad we kind of got into it um and you know it is it is
1:33:29
interesting that i mean i SOROS FUNDS through his network a large swath
1:33:34
of "PROGRESSIVE MEDIA" so they kind of take a liberal INTERVENTIONIST LINE i don't
1:33:40
think george soros is like you must do this or you will all be fired

but i can tell you aaron like i feel like more
1:33:47
candid than i was able to be in the past i'll tell you two stories about soros
1:33:53
i guess i'll tell the 5500 people watching as well number one one outlet i i used to frequently write
1:34:01
for a progressive outlet won't name it i was actually told we can't publish pieces about soros and
1:34:08
what he's doing with you know funding and regime change ngos we got to stay away from that because they were
1:34:13
courting his people at the time for funding so that it that does happen
1:34:19


um my second story is that i was in a i mean i don't want to give all the
1:34:24
details because i don't want to like embarrass certain individual people but i was in uh middle eastern city
1:34:33
during the latter phases of the so-called arab spring which some called the sunni
1:34:39
winter and i went i went out to dinner
1:34:45
it was a pretty nice dinner in a society that was becoming increasingly impoverished
1:34:51
and one of SOROS' GUYS showed up he was the head of the open society foundations
1:34:58
for the middle east i think or not the head but he was working there they didn't have an office in this
1:35:03
country i said what are you doing here and he said well THE LABOUR UNIONS HAVE TOO MUCH CONTROL and WE WANT things to
1:35:10
open up here economically we want a more dynamic society and so uh we're working on uh you know
1:35:16
encouraging some political changes and i kind of like made a joke i was like what are you gonna do like FUND PROTESTS
1:35:22
or something and he kind of nodded i was like that's crazy l

Like this is
1:35:28
real it's really happening and you know just talking to some of the younger english-speaking TECHNOCRATS
1:35:34
in this society they were all saying the SAME THINGS like the labor unions have too much power they're they're just
1:35:40
they're just stopping us from moving forward and TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE have these PENSIONS and these old jobs from
1:35:45
the previous regime so that's really like what he's done and that's called LIBERALIZATION
1:35:52
but to me it's like the ultimate form of MEDDLING and it's someone who really
1:35:58
i mean i don't know what country he claims to represent hungary the U.S. what it seems like HE REPRESENTS JUST GLOBAL CAPITALISM
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:11:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
continuing the copy/paste [rave]
nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW
ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....
1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet
so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here
uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant
and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure
actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic
THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST
YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
ON GEORGE SOROS [AND WESTERN/JEWISH OLIGARCHS LIKE HIM ]
WHO FUNDED ZELENSKI INTO OFFICE IN 2019 & THE AZOV BATTALION MOVEMENT ????
Q--
max one thing i want to ask you uh colonel mcgregor mentioned george soros
1:28:46
in the context of ukraine and often when we hear george soros's name
1:28:51
they can come in the form of either you know anti-semitic conspiracy theories or they also can come
1:28:57
in the realm of uh real things and so in the case of ukraine
1:29:02
has soros had an influence in terms of manufacturing uh the uh the REGIME
1:29:08
CHANGE operation that happened in 2014 and other related efforts to basically turn ukraine into a NATO Colony
A ---
1:29:15
well definitely i mean you know the answer to that i mean right now the big player in ukraine
1:29:22
would be zielinski's money man igor kolomoisky who's one of the MOST CORRUPT MEN on the planet funded
1:29:28
zielinski while he funded the azov battalion uh basically funded zielinski's career
1:29:34
through these shell accounts that showed up in the PANDORA PAPERS and still is wielding influence i would assume over
1:29:41
negotiations
but uh soros i mean when did he last kind of turn up in the news it was
1:29:47
JUST BEFORE the Russian operation in ukraine during another event that the world's
1:29:54
eyes were focused on which was the winter OLYMPICS in beijing and he used that occasion to call for REGIME CHANGE
1:30:00
in BEIJING CHINA and the DIOWNFALL of xi jinping so that's i mean he just he's
1:30:07
just out there saying it !!!!!!!!!!!!
GEORGE SOROS s i think the main funder of the new york
1:30:14
review of books which is the um the literary political review of the
1:30:21
bien penson liberal intelligentsia in new york and he whenever he wants he can write an
1:30:27
article there and every time he does IT'S TO CALL FOR REGIME CHANGE IN A NEW PLACE
i remember he said you know it's
1:30:32
really important that we have regime change in SYRIA in order to STOP PUTIN
He wrote a piece prior to that declaring
1:30:38
that PUTIN WAS WORSE THAN ISIS TERRORISTS He's been OBSSESSED and what does
1:30:43
do well he is one of the OVERT OPERATORS identified in the 1991 washington post
1:30:50
column by david ignatius who's one of the CIA'S KIND OF FAVOURITE CHANNELS IN US MEDIA
1:30:57
one of the overt operators DOING THE WORK THE CIA USED TO DO COVERTLY IN THE OPEN
1:31:03
ignatius also identified the national endowment for democracy uh he you know uh he gave a pat on the back to the
1:31:09
afl-cio i would call the afl-cia which is now clamoring for SANCTIONS ON
1:31:15
RUSSIAN WORKERS and all of these other channels for SOFT POWER and u.s influence
1:31:22
and he foreshadowed in that column the the coming COLOR REVOLUTIONS
1:31:27
uh that would TOPPLE GOVERNMENTS that were still friendly or maintain good diplomatic
1:31:33
TIES WITH RUSSIA after the soviet union the first one was uh edward shevandartzi the former foreign minister to
1:31:39
mikhail gorbachev who was president of GEORGIA and his replacement with the CIA ASSETT ultimately mikhail sakashvili who
1:31:47
led georgia into direct military confrontation with russia over south ossetia [[ LATER GOVERNOR OF ODESSA UNDER POROSHENKO UKRAINE GOVT - A CIA / NATO SHILL NUT CASE ]
1:31:53
SOROS is funding the civil society groups through his open societies foundations as an overt operator he's funding the
1:32:01
young people who you know getting them like they'll come out in in us in a town square in tibilisi or kiev and they all show up in
1:32:08
the same color pancho you know it's someone like soros WHO'S PAYING for that along with the
1:32:14
OPPOSITION MEDIA [ UKRAINES CURRENT GLOBAL PR PROPAGANDA OPERATION IN THE MEDIA ??? ]
we saw a outlet called romanski if you're watching it's spelled
1:32:20
h-r-o-m-a-d-s-k-e if you want to look it up this cropped up over popped up overnight
1:32:27
to support the MAIDAN uh so-called revolution of dignity the coup attempt in 2013 2014 and it was
1:32:34
sponsored by soros and also pierre omidyar which is really interesting because you know he controls the
1:32:40
INTERCEPT MEDIA OUTLET [ THAT GREENWALD QUIT IN DISGUST ] and they're writing about ukraine without acknowledging that THEIR FUNDER / OWNER HAD A DIRECT HAND IN
1:32:47
THE UKRAINE COUP OF 2014 that took us to where we are TODAY
so that's why i think GEORGE SOROS is such a
1:32:53
is considered THE DEVIL EVERYWHERE from hungary to russia and all of these laws
1:32:59
are introduced TO BAN NGOS -- HRW human rights watch being the largest ngo that uh
1:33:04
SOROS FUNDS and then the west counters and says oh they're anti-democratic they're trying to ban human rights
1:33:10
groups they won't allow a civil society and ANY CRITICISM OF SOROS is deemed ANTI-SEMITIC [ HOW CONVENIENT IS THAT ? ]
1:33:17
so i'm sure everyone watching kind of knew that history you knew the answer to your
1:33:22
own question but i'm glad we kind of got into it um and you know it is it is
1:33:29
interesting that i mean i SOROS FUNDS through his network a large swath
1:33:34
of "PROGRESSIVE MEDIA" so they kind of take a liberal INTERVENTIONIST LINE i don't
1:33:40
think george soros is like you must do this or you will all be fired
but i can tell you aaron like i feel like more
1:33:47
candid than i was able to be in the past i'll tell you two stories about soros
1:33:53
i guess i'll tell the 5500 people watching as well number one one outlet i i used to frequently write
1:34:01
for a progressive outlet won't name it i was actually told we can't publish pieces about soros and
1:34:08
what he's doing with you know funding and regime change ngos we got to stay away from that because they were
1:34:13
courting his people at the time for funding so that it that does happen
1:34:19
um my second story is that i was in a i mean i don't want to give all the
1:34:24
details because i don't want to like embarrass certain individual people but i was in uh middle eastern city
1:34:33
during the latter phases of the so-called arab spring which some called the sunni
1:34:39
winter and i went i went out to dinner
1:34:45
it was a pretty nice dinner in a society that was becoming increasingly impoverished
1:34:51
and one of SOROS' GUYS showed up he was the head of the open society foundations
1:34:58
for the middle east i think or not the head but he was working there they didn't have an office in this
1:35:03
country i said what are you doing here and he said well THE LABOUR UNIONS HAVE TOO MUCH CONTROL and WE WANT things to
1:35:10
open up here economically we want a more dynamic society and so uh we're working on uh you know
1:35:16
encouraging some political changes and i kind of like made a joke i was like what are you gonna do like FUND PROTESTS
1:35:22
or something and he kind of nodded i was like that's crazy l
Like this is
1:35:28
real it's really happening and you know just talking to some of the younger english-speaking TECHNOCRATS
1:35:34
in this society they were all saying the SAME THINGS like the labor unions have too much power they're they're just
1:35:40
they're just stopping us from moving forward and TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE have these PENSIONS and these old jobs from
1:35:45
the previous regime so that's really like what he's done and that's called LIBERALIZATION
1:35:52
but to me it's like the ultimate form of MEDDLING and it's someone who really
1:35:58
i mean i don't know what country he claims to represent hungary the U.S. what it seems like HE REPRESENTS JUST GLOBAL CAPITALISM
FREE PRESS? RT BANNED ?
US & MEDIA JOURNOS RESPONSES TO JULIAN ASSANGE/WIKILEAKS VS RUSSIAN TV WOMAN WITH ANTI-WAR SIGN

it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin


1:39:26
what happened well i just it's just you know this was exactly normalized by russia gate where anything deemed to be
1:39:32
russian disinformation associated with russia was inherently nefarious and
1:39:38
this uh crisis this invasion of ukraine gave them the pretext to essentially wipe off
1:39:44
the airwaves a countervailing narrative that doesn't mean that rt was always 100
1:39:49
factual or that they didn't promote uh russian propaganda i'm sure they did but what they also did is presented a point
1:39:57
of view that was banned on u.s airways that was a counterweight especially on issues like syria
1:40:03
um and many other important geopolitical issues and it just i'm just uh it's amazing to me how
1:40:09
everyone or a lot of people immediately sort of either applauded this or shrugged and i'll be right back next i'll be
1:40:15
right back yeah um and i want to get this question
1:40:20
up to um when do i expect biden to give asylum to
1:40:26
the azov battalion i've actually been thinking about this a little bit
1:40:32
well on the question of rt uh rt america
1:40:38
was not banned by the u.s government it was a casualty
1:40:44
of the sanctions of the u.s attack on the ruble
1:40:50
and uh it was very abrupt so what was really sad about it for me
1:40:55
you know because i'd been in their studios just i'd come in as a guest to comment on my pieces or i'd participate
1:41:00
in panel discussions whatever over the years i got to know a lot of just the
1:41:06
the more blue-collar people working in there the cameraman the techs uh the editors
1:41:13
these are just hard-working people in media who saw their jobs just terminated
1:41:18
overnight out of nowhere and you know i don't know where they're going to wind up next um
1:41:25
and it was a very unique network i mean that you could i it was the only network in town where i could actually
1:41:31
talk about think tanks like the atlantic council being funded by the arms industry and
1:41:36
you know generating the banging the war drums it was you know the only place that
1:41:42
hosted a left-wing anti-imperialist comedy show with the live studio audience and with the uh you know
1:41:49
lockdowns and quarantines the studio audience went away uh that was hosted by lee camp then we saw lee have his
1:41:56
um ability to even get likes on youtube taken away by youtube uh facebook took
1:42:02
away the ability to get likes the algorithm just crushed that show and now you know lee has had his entire archive
1:42:09
removed i mean the entire archive of breaking the set has been removed by youtube
1:42:15
lee's show at spotify which had nothing to do with rt america was taken away so it is a straight-up attack on
1:42:22
journalists and journalism and all the correspondents at rt america the higher profile ones um
1:42:28
or caleb maupin at rt but rachel blevins at rt america they were labeled
1:42:34
russian state-affiliated media on their personal twitter pages
1:42:39
uh that was to kind of intimidate them i think and caused them to quit before rt
1:42:45
america um closed up shop abruptly
1:42:50
but uh you know and there's been of course no solidarity or outcry from anyone else in u.s media
1:42:57
because you know we we have to hate tchaikovsky we have to hate
1:43:03
all russian culture russian people who have nothing to do with the kremlin are now being targeted so naturally rt
1:43:10
would would would be in the crosshairs
1:43:15
there's a lot to say about it and um you know sputnik still broadcasts in
1:43:22
washington dc on fm uh it's still
1:43:28
it's still sort of there but the washington post has basically been broadcasting calls for it to be banned
1:43:33
as well the first amendment is not it it does it doesn't exist anymore
1:43:40
the u.s government is waging an information war and it is effectively merged with corporate media and if you
1:43:47
look at what is happening to julian assange where his appeals are being shot down one after another while all these
1:43:53
bbc journalists and journalists in washington are cheering for a woman who protested on russia's state channel one
1:44:00
against the war just ignoring julian assange and what their own country is doing
1:44:05
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:44:11
and the attacks on tucker carlson are very interesting we're seeing calls for him to be put on
1:44:17
track file on the top eight of the view and be
1:44:23
investigated for kremlin ties because he is interrogating the whole issue of u.s
1:44:28
backed bio labs in ukraine and as i said before i think part of removing part of
1:44:34
the logic of removing rt from youtube getting it off the airwaves was booted off directv as well
1:44:42
and the attacks on tucker carlson are to prevent a counter narrative if there is a dumas-style staged event
1:44:49
where that event can trigger possible western intervention in ukraine and that really
1:44:56
highlights the danger of not having a counter narrative that allows people to think i mean when remember the skripal
1:45:02
poisoning in salisbury england it was really only rt
1:45:08
that provided a counter narrative to the immediate claim that you know russia had waged a chemical attack on nato soil and
1:45:15
it triggered article 5. so yeah and we get attacked here as well
1:45:20
in the same way but you have someone on national tv speaking before a national audience it's the highest rated cable
1:45:28
news show who is talking about u.s sponsored
1:45:33
bio labs in ukraine which could have produced potentially a bio weapon and
1:45:39
just ripping to shreds the official narrative it's a major threat and they
1:45:44
don't know what to do with them uh except to call for complete censorship
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:21:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
continuing the copy/paste [rave]
nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW
ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....
1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet
so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here
uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant
and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure
actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic
THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST
YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
ON GEORGE SOROS [AND WESTERN/JEWISH OLIGARCHS LIKE HIM ]
WHO FUNDED ZELENSKI INTO OFFICE IN 2019 & THE AZOV BATTALION MOVEMENT ????
Q--
max one thing i want to ask you uh colonel mcgregor mentioned george soros
1:28:46
in the context of ukraine and often when we hear george soros's name
1:28:51
they can come in the form of either you know anti-semitic conspiracy theories or they also can come
1:28:57
in the realm of uh real things and so in the case of ukraine
1:29:02
has soros had an influence in terms of manufacturing uh the uh the REGIME
1:29:08
CHANGE operation that happened in 2014 and other related efforts to basically turn ukraine into a NATO Colony
A ---
1:29:15
well definitely i mean you know the answer to that i mean right now the big player in ukraine
1:29:22
would be zielinski's money man igor kolomoisky who's one of the MOST CORRUPT MEN on the planet funded
1:29:28
zielinski while he funded the azov battalion uh basically funded zielinski's career
1:29:34
through these shell accounts that showed up in the PANDORA PAPERS and still is wielding influence i would assume over
1:29:41
negotiations
but uh soros i mean when did he last kind of turn up in the news it was
1:29:47
JUST BEFORE the Russian operation in ukraine during another event that the world's
1:29:54
eyes were focused on which was the winter OLYMPICS in beijing and he used that occasion to call for REGIME CHANGE
1:30:00
in BEIJING CHINA and the DIOWNFALL of xi jinping so that's i mean he just he's
1:30:07
just out there saying it !!!!!!!!!!!!
GEORGE SOROS s i think the main funder of the new york
1:30:14
review of books which is the um the literary political review of the
1:30:21
bien penson liberal intelligentsia in new york and he whenever he wants he can write an
1:30:27
article there and every time he does IT'S TO CALL FOR REGIME CHANGE IN A NEW PLACE
i remember he said you know it's
1:30:32
really important that we have regime change in SYRIA in order to STOP PUTIN
He wrote a piece prior to that declaring
1:30:38
that PUTIN WAS WORSE THAN ISIS TERRORISTS He's been OBSSESSED and what does
1:30:43
do well he is one of the OVERT OPERATORS identified in the 1991 washington post
1:30:50
column by david ignatius who's one of the CIA'S KIND OF FAVOURITE CHANNELS IN US MEDIA
1:30:57
one of the overt operators DOING THE WORK THE CIA USED TO DO COVERTLY IN THE OPEN
1:31:03
ignatius also identified the national endowment for democracy uh he you know uh he gave a pat on the back to the
1:31:09
afl-cio i would call the afl-cia which is now clamoring for SANCTIONS ON
1:31:15
RUSSIAN WORKERS and all of these other channels for SOFT POWER and u.s influence
1:31:22
and he foreshadowed in that column the the coming COLOR REVOLUTIONS
1:31:27
uh that would TOPPLE GOVERNMENTS that were still friendly or maintain good diplomatic
1:31:33
TIES WITH RUSSIA after the soviet union the first one was uh edward shevandartzi the former foreign minister to
1:31:39
mikhail gorbachev who was president of GEORGIA and his replacement with the CIA ASSETT ultimately mikhail sakashvili who
1:31:47
led georgia into direct military confrontation with russia over south ossetia [[ LATER GOVERNOR OF ODESSA UNDER POROSHENKO UKRAINE GOVT - A CIA / NATO SHILL NUT CASE ]
1:31:53
SOROS is funding the civil society groups through his open societies foundations as an overt operator he's funding the
1:32:01
young people who you know getting them like they'll come out in in us in a town square in tibilisi or kiev and they all show up in
1:32:08
the same color pancho you know it's someone like soros WHO'S PAYING for that along with the
1:32:14
OPPOSITION MEDIA [ UKRAINES CURRENT GLOBAL PR PROPAGANDA OPERATION IN THE MEDIA ??? ]
we saw a outlet called romanski if you're watching it's spelled
1:32:20
h-r-o-m-a-d-s-k-e if you want to look it up this cropped up over popped up overnight
1:32:27
to support the MAIDAN uh so-called revolution of dignity the coup attempt in 2013 2014 and it was
1:32:34
sponsored by soros and also pierre omidyar which is really interesting because you know he controls the
1:32:40
INTERCEPT MEDIA OUTLET [ THAT GREENWALD QUIT IN DISGUST ] and they're writing about ukraine without acknowledging that THEIR FUNDER / OWNER HAD A DIRECT HAND IN
1:32:47
THE UKRAINE COUP OF 2014 that took us to where we are TODAY
so that's why i think GEORGE SOROS is such a
1:32:53
is considered THE DEVIL EVERYWHERE from hungary to russia and all of these laws
1:32:59
are introduced TO BAN NGOS -- HRW human rights watch being the largest ngo that uh
1:33:04
SOROS FUNDS and then the west counters and says oh they're anti-democratic they're trying to ban human rights
1:33:10
groups they won't allow a civil society and ANY CRITICISM OF SOROS is deemed ANTI-SEMITIC [ HOW CONVENIENT IS THAT ? ]
1:33:17
so i'm sure everyone watching kind of knew that history you knew the answer to your
1:33:22
own question but i'm glad we kind of got into it um and you know it is it is
1:33:29
interesting that i mean i SOROS FUNDS through his network a large swath
1:33:34
of "PROGRESSIVE MEDIA" so they kind of take a liberal INTERVENTIONIST LINE i don't
1:33:40
think george soros is like you must do this or you will all be fired
but i can tell you aaron like i feel like more
1:33:47
candid than i was able to be in the past i'll tell you two stories about soros
1:33:53
i guess i'll tell the 5500 people watching as well number one one outlet i i used to frequently write
1:34:01
for a progressive outlet won't name it i was actually told we can't publish pieces about soros and
1:34:08
what he's doing with you know funding and regime change ngos we got to stay away from that because they were
1:34:13
courting his people at the time for funding so that it that does happen
1:34:19
um my second story is that i was in a i mean i don't want to give all the
1:34:24
details because i don't want to like embarrass certain individual people but i was in uh middle eastern city
1:34:33
during the latter phases of the so-called arab spring which some called the sunni
1:34:39
winter and i went i went out to dinner
1:34:45
it was a pretty nice dinner in a society that was becoming increasingly impoverished
1:34:51
and one of SOROS' GUYS showed up he was the head of the open society foundations
1:34:58
for the middle east i think or not the head but he was working there they didn't have an office in this
1:35:03
country i said what are you doing here and he said well THE LABOUR UNIONS HAVE TOO MUCH CONTROL and WE WANT things to
1:35:10
open up here economically we want a more dynamic society and so uh we're working on uh you know
1:35:16
encouraging some political changes and i kind of like made a joke i was like what are you gonna do like FUND PROTESTS
1:35:22
or something and he kind of nodded i was like that's crazy l
Like this is
1:35:28
real it's really happening and you know just talking to some of the younger english-speaking TECHNOCRATS
1:35:34
in this society they were all saying the SAME THINGS like the labor unions have too much power they're they're just
1:35:40
they're just stopping us from moving forward and TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE have these PENSIONS and these old jobs from
1:35:45
the previous regime so that's really like what he's done and that's called LIBERALIZATION
1:35:52
but to me it's like the ultimate form of MEDDLING and it's someone who really
1:35:58
i mean i don't know what country he claims to represent hungary the U.S. what it seems like HE REPRESENTS JUST GLOBAL CAPITALISM
FREE PRESS? RT BANNED ?
US & MEDIA JOURNOS RESPONSES TO JULIAN ASSANGE/WIKILEAKS VS RUSSIAN TV WOMAN WITH ANTI-WAR SIGN
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:39:26
what happened well i just it's just you know this was exactly normalized by russia gate where anything deemed to be
1:39:32
russian disinformation associated with russia was inherently nefarious and
1:39:38
this uh crisis this invasion of ukraine gave them the pretext to essentially wipe off
1:39:44
the airwaves a countervailing narrative that doesn't mean that rt was always 100
1:39:49
factual or that they didn't promote uh russian propaganda i'm sure they did but what they also did is presented a point
1:39:57
of view that was banned on u.s airways that was a counterweight especially on issues like syria
1:40:03
um and many other important geopolitical issues and it just i'm just uh it's amazing to me how
1:40:09
everyone or a lot of people immediately sort of either applauded this or shrugged and i'll be right back next i'll be
1:40:15
right back yeah um and i want to get this question
1:40:20
up to um when do i expect biden to give asylum to
1:40:26
the azov battalion i've actually been thinking about this a little bit
1:40:32
well on the question of rt uh rt america
1:40:38
was not banned by the u.s government it was a casualty
1:40:44
of the sanctions of the u.s attack on the ruble
1:40:50
and uh it was very abrupt so what was really sad about it for me
1:40:55
you know because i'd been in their studios just i'd come in as a guest to comment on my pieces or i'd participate
1:41:00
in panel discussions whatever over the years i got to know a lot of just the
1:41:06
the more blue-collar people working in there the cameraman the techs uh the editors
1:41:13
these are just hard-working people in media who saw their jobs just terminated
1:41:18
overnight out of nowhere and you know i don't know where they're going to wind up next um
1:41:25
and it was a very unique network i mean that you could i it was the only network in town where i could actually
1:41:31
talk about think tanks like the atlantic council being funded by the arms industry and
1:41:36
you know generating the banging the war drums it was you know the only place that
1:41:42
hosted a left-wing anti-imperialist comedy show with the live studio audience and with the uh you know
1:41:49
lockdowns and quarantines the studio audience went away uh that was hosted by lee camp then we saw lee have his
1:41:56
um ability to even get likes on youtube taken away by youtube uh facebook took
1:42:02
away the ability to get likes the algorithm just crushed that show and now you know lee has had his entire archive
1:42:09
removed i mean the entire archive of breaking the set has been removed by youtube
1:42:15
lee's show at spotify which had nothing to do with rt america was taken away so it is a straight-up attack on
1:42:22
journalists and journalism and all the correspondents at rt america the higher profile ones um
1:42:28
or caleb maupin at rt but rachel blevins at rt america they were labeled
1:42:34
russian state-affiliated media on their personal twitter pages
1:42:39
uh that was to kind of intimidate them i think and caused them to quit before rt
1:42:45
america um closed up shop abruptly
1:42:50
but uh you know and there's been of course no solidarity or outcry from anyone else in u.s media
1:42:57
because you know we we have to hate tchaikovsky we have to hate
1:43:03
all russian culture russian people who have nothing to do with the kremlin are now being targeted so naturally rt
1:43:10
would would would be in the crosshairs
1:43:15
there's a lot to say about it and um you know sputnik still broadcasts in
1:43:22
washington dc on fm uh it's still
1:43:28
it's still sort of there but the washington post has basically been broadcasting calls for it to be banned
1:43:33
as well the first amendment is not it it does it doesn't exist anymore
1:43:40
the u.s government is waging an information war and it is effectively merged with corporate media and if you
1:43:47
look at what is happening to julian assange where his appeals are being shot down one after another while all these
1:43:53
bbc journalists and journalists in washington are cheering for a woman who protested on russia's state channel one
1:44:00
against the war just ignoring julian assange and what their own country is doing
1:44:05
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:44:11
and the attacks on tucker carlson are very interesting we're seeing calls for him to be put on
1:44:17
track file on the top eight of the view and be
1:44:23
investigated for kremlin ties because he is interrogating the whole issue of u.s
1:44:28
backed bio labs in ukraine and as i said before i think part of removing part of
1:44:34
the logic of removing rt from youtube getting it off the airwaves was booted off directv as well
1:44:42
and the attacks on tucker carlson are to prevent a counter narrative if there is a dumas-style staged event
1:44:49
where that event can trigger possible western intervention in ukraine and that really
1:44:56
highlights the danger of not having a counter narrative that allows people to think i mean when remember the skripal
1:45:02
poisoning in salisbury england it was really only rt
1:45:08
that provided a counter narrative to the immediate claim that you know russia had waged a chemical attack on nato soil and
1:45:15
it triggered article 5. so yeah and we get attacked here as well
1:45:20
in the same way but you have someone on national tv speaking before a national audience it's the highest rated cable
1:45:28
news show who is talking about u.s sponsored
1:45:33
bio labs in ukraine which could have produced potentially a bio weapon and
1:45:39
just ripping to shreds the official narrative it's a major threat and they
1:45:44
don't know what to do with them uh except to call for complete censorship
ALL OF THIS IS VERY GOOD THINKING AND INFO PROVISION

INFLUENCE OF EXTREME RIGHT NATIONALIST FASCISTS NEO-NAZIS IN US POLITICS

CUBANS VENEZUELANS EL SALVADORANS AND UKRAINIANS .... AND POST-WW2 NAZI IMMIGRANTS BY CIA

1:45:49
now basically uh we had another question on you know as of getting asylum
1:45:56
i don't know about as of battalion getting asylum from the u.s but we have seen
1:46:02
various waves of uh what of um
1:46:08
we've seen there is a history of the cia providing asylum
1:46:14
to nazi war criminals like mikola lebed who was involved in the extermination of
1:46:21
jews in nazi-controlled ukraine he was set up with his own private printing press called prologue which was
1:46:28
an anti-communist ukrainian publication sponsored by the cia he ran
1:46:33
it out of a flat uh in the lower east side of new york and you know we know about operation
1:46:41
paperclip we know about all these rat lines you do have a lobby in the u.s
1:46:46
which is if you look at the work of moss robeson who's worked for the gray zone
1:46:52
contributed to the gray zone basically the ounb network set up by stephan
1:46:58
bandera and these nazi collaborators repurposed into essentially a ukrainian
1:47:03
diaspora lobby but they are a bandera lobby that supports
1:47:08
the extremist side of the ukrainian political spectrum and seeks to manipulate u.s politics in order to
1:47:16
drive a direct u.s confrontation with what was once the soviet union and now
1:47:22
is russia they were originally the anti-bolshevik network and now they have a kind of a series of kind of ukrainian
1:47:29
lobbying organizations it's very dangerous and we're going to see
1:47:34
as we saw you know with the destabilization of other countries whether you know
1:47:41
cuba el salvador a massive migration wave there has been a huge migration wave to the west since
1:47:48
2014 since the maidan coup and we'll see another migration wave and those lobbies will increase their power
1:47:54
by uh inculcating these new migrants into uh their
1:48:00
their mentality of direct confrontation retribution for what has been done to us
1:48:06
the venezuelan lobby got beefed up massively after venezuela was sanctioned
1:48:11
and economically destabilized these past years and it helped contribute to trump's victory in florida so now you
1:48:17
have uh basically biden is going to lose florida and it's
1:48:23
partly because not only of the demographic shift there lots of right-wing colombians who
1:48:30
hate the democrats and now right-wing venezuelans who hate maduro biden went and negotiated with maduro
1:48:39
over the protest of the miami cuban and venezuelan lobby so that's off the table
1:48:45
you have growing ukrainian populations that are more politically mobilized than ever we have seen them in washington
1:48:51
here they have huge rallies like almost every weekend in ohio
1:48:56
in minnesota and across swing states
1:49:03
but especially ohio minnesota i believe michigan actually if you remember that fateful
1:49:10
meeting where john mccain lindsey and lindsey graham went to meet with a right like an extremist ukrainian power
1:49:15
military the idarb italian or was it the nepro battalion and lindsey graham called for um you know a war the
1:49:22
following year amy klobuchar was with them because she has a lot of
1:49:27
ukrainian americans in her district so that lobby is going to increase its power and increase its pressure and the
1:49:33
democrats are trying to ride that lobby this is you know just my take
1:49:38
uh to victory in 2024 to offset their losses in florida because they are in swing
1:49:45
districts

ITS ALL QUITE SICK IMHO ..... TWISTED N HYPOCRITICAL LYING BULLSHIT ... BUT WHATEVER; IT IS WHAT IT IS

AND IF PEOPLE ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE SO GULLIBLE AND MANIPULATED OR FIGHT BACK AGGRESSIVELY THEN THATS WHAT HAPPENS IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ... PEOPLE WILL BE HURT N KILLED. IT'S WHAT HAPPENS EVERYWHERE ALL THE TIME - AMERICA IS NOT IMMUNE TO CHAOS
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
continuing the copy/paste [rave]
nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW
ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....
1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet
so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here
uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant
and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure
actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic
THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST
YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
ON GEORGE SOROS [AND WESTERN/JEWISH OLIGARCHS LIKE HIM ]
WHO FUNDED ZELENSKI INTO OFFICE IN 2019 & THE AZOV BATTALION MOVEMENT ????
Q--
max one thing i want to ask you uh colonel mcgregor mentioned george soros
1:28:46
in the context of ukraine and often when we hear george soros's name
1:28:51
they can come in the form of either you know anti-semitic conspiracy theories or they also can come
1:28:57
in the realm of uh real things and so in the case of ukraine
1:29:02
has soros had an influence in terms of manufacturing uh the uh the REGIME
1:29:08
CHANGE operation that happened in 2014 and other related efforts to basically turn ukraine into a NATO Colony
A ---
1:29:15
well definitely i mean you know the answer to that i mean right now the big player in ukraine
1:29:22
would be zielinski's money man igor kolomoisky who's one of the MOST CORRUPT MEN on the planet funded
1:29:28
zielinski while he funded the azov battalion uh basically funded zielinski's career
1:29:34
through these shell accounts that showed up in the PANDORA PAPERS and still is wielding influence i would assume over
1:29:41
negotiations
but uh soros i mean when did he last kind of turn up in the news it was
1:29:47
JUST BEFORE the Russian operation in ukraine during another event that the world's
1:29:54
eyes were focused on which was the winter OLYMPICS in beijing and he used that occasion to call for REGIME CHANGE
1:30:00
in BEIJING CHINA and the DIOWNFALL of xi jinping so that's i mean he just he's
1:30:07
just out there saying it !!!!!!!!!!!!
GEORGE SOROS s i think the main funder of the new york
1:30:14
review of books which is the um the literary political review of the
1:30:21
bien penson liberal intelligentsia in new york and he whenever he wants he can write an
1:30:27
article there and every time he does IT'S TO CALL FOR REGIME CHANGE IN A NEW PLACE
i remember he said you know it's
1:30:32
really important that we have regime change in SYRIA in order to STOP PUTIN
He wrote a piece prior to that declaring
1:30:38
that PUTIN WAS WORSE THAN ISIS TERRORISTS He's been OBSSESSED and what does
1:30:43
do well he is one of the OVERT OPERATORS identified in the 1991 washington post
1:30:50
column by david ignatius who's one of the CIA'S KIND OF FAVOURITE CHANNELS IN US MEDIA
1:30:57
one of the overt operators DOING THE WORK THE CIA USED TO DO COVERTLY IN THE OPEN
1:31:03
ignatius also identified the national endowment for democracy uh he you know uh he gave a pat on the back to the
1:31:09
afl-cio i would call the afl-cia which is now clamoring for SANCTIONS ON
1:31:15
RUSSIAN WORKERS and all of these other channels for SOFT POWER and u.s influence
1:31:22
and he foreshadowed in that column the the coming COLOR REVOLUTIONS
1:31:27
uh that would TOPPLE GOVERNMENTS that were still friendly or maintain good diplomatic
1:31:33
TIES WITH RUSSIA after the soviet union the first one was uh edward shevandartzi the former foreign minister to
1:31:39
mikhail gorbachev who was president of GEORGIA and his replacement with the CIA ASSETT ultimately mikhail sakashvili who
1:31:47
led georgia into direct military confrontation with russia over south ossetia [[ LATER GOVERNOR OF ODESSA UNDER POROSHENKO UKRAINE GOVT - A CIA / NATO SHILL NUT CASE ]
1:31:53
SOROS is funding the civil society groups through his open societies foundations as an overt operator he's funding the
1:32:01
young people who you know getting them like they'll come out in in us in a town square in tibilisi or kiev and they all show up in
1:32:08
the same color pancho you know it's someone like soros WHO'S PAYING for that along with the
1:32:14
OPPOSITION MEDIA [ UKRAINES CURRENT GLOBAL PR PROPAGANDA OPERATION IN THE MEDIA ??? ]
we saw a outlet called romanski if you're watching it's spelled
1:32:20
h-r-o-m-a-d-s-k-e if you want to look it up this cropped up over popped up overnight
1:32:27
to support the MAIDAN uh so-called revolution of dignity the coup attempt in 2013 2014 and it was
1:32:34
sponsored by soros and also pierre omidyar which is really interesting because you know he controls the
1:32:40
INTERCEPT MEDIA OUTLET [ THAT GREENWALD QUIT IN DISGUST ] and they're writing about ukraine without acknowledging that THEIR FUNDER / OWNER HAD A DIRECT HAND IN
1:32:47
THE UKRAINE COUP OF 2014 that took us to where we are TODAY
so that's why i think GEORGE SOROS is such a
1:32:53
is considered THE DEVIL EVERYWHERE from hungary to russia and all of these laws
1:32:59
are introduced TO BAN NGOS -- HRW human rights watch being the largest ngo that uh
1:33:04
SOROS FUNDS and then the west counters and says oh they're anti-democratic they're trying to ban human rights
1:33:10
groups they won't allow a civil society and ANY CRITICISM OF SOROS is deemed ANTI-SEMITIC [ HOW CONVENIENT IS THAT ? ]
1:33:17
so i'm sure everyone watching kind of knew that history you knew the answer to your
1:33:22
own question but i'm glad we kind of got into it um and you know it is it is
1:33:29
interesting that i mean i SOROS FUNDS through his network a large swath
1:33:34
of "PROGRESSIVE MEDIA" so they kind of take a liberal INTERVENTIONIST LINE i don't
1:33:40
think george soros is like you must do this or you will all be fired
but i can tell you aaron like i feel like more
1:33:47
candid than i was able to be in the past i'll tell you two stories about soros
1:33:53
i guess i'll tell the 5500 people watching as well number one one outlet i i used to frequently write
1:34:01
for a progressive outlet won't name it i was actually told we can't publish pieces about soros and
1:34:08
what he's doing with you know funding and regime change ngos we got to stay away from that because they were
1:34:13
courting his people at the time for funding so that it that does happen
1:34:19
um my second story is that i was in a i mean i don't want to give all the
1:34:24
details because i don't want to like embarrass certain individual people but i was in uh middle eastern city
1:34:33
during the latter phases of the so-called arab spring which some called the sunni
1:34:39
winter and i went i went out to dinner
1:34:45
it was a pretty nice dinner in a society that was becoming increasingly impoverished
1:34:51
and one of SOROS' GUYS showed up he was the head of the open society foundations
1:34:58
for the middle east i think or not the head but he was working there they didn't have an office in this
1:35:03
country i said what are you doing here and he said well THE LABOUR UNIONS HAVE TOO MUCH CONTROL and WE WANT things to
1:35:10
open up here economically we want a more dynamic society and so uh we're working on uh you know
1:35:16
encouraging some political changes and i kind of like made a joke i was like what are you gonna do like FUND PROTESTS
1:35:22
or something and he kind of nodded i was like that's crazy l
Like this is
1:35:28
real it's really happening and you know just talking to some of the younger english-speaking TECHNOCRATS
1:35:34
in this society they were all saying the SAME THINGS like the labor unions have too much power they're they're just
1:35:40
they're just stopping us from moving forward and TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE have these PENSIONS and these old jobs from
1:35:45
the previous regime so that's really like what he's done and that's called LIBERALIZATION
1:35:52
but to me it's like the ultimate form of MEDDLING and it's someone who really
1:35:58
i mean i don't know what country he claims to represent hungary the U.S. what it seems like HE REPRESENTS JUST GLOBAL CAPITALISM
FREE PRESS? RT BANNED ?
US & MEDIA JOURNOS RESPONSES TO JULIAN ASSANGE/WIKILEAKS VS RUSSIAN TV WOMAN WITH ANTI-WAR SIGN
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:39:26
what happened well i just it's just you know this was exactly normalized by russia gate where anything deemed to be
1:39:32
russian disinformation associated with russia was inherently nefarious and
1:39:38
this uh crisis this invasion of ukraine gave them the pretext to essentially wipe off
1:39:44
the airwaves a countervailing narrative that doesn't mean that rt was always 100
1:39:49
factual or that they didn't promote uh russian propaganda i'm sure they did but what they also did is presented a point
1:39:57
of view that was banned on u.s airways that was a counterweight especially on issues like syria
1:40:03
um and many other important geopolitical issues and it just i'm just uh it's amazing to me how
1:40:09
everyone or a lot of people immediately sort of either applauded this or shrugged and i'll be right back next i'll be
1:40:15
right back yeah um and i want to get this question
1:40:20
up to um when do i expect biden to give asylum to
1:40:26
the azov battalion i've actually been thinking about this a little bit
1:40:32
well on the question of rt uh rt america
1:40:38
was not banned by the u.s government it was a casualty
1:40:44
of the sanctions of the u.s attack on the ruble
1:40:50
and uh it was very abrupt so what was really sad about it for me
1:40:55
you know because i'd been in their studios just i'd come in as a guest to comment on my pieces or i'd participate
1:41:00
in panel discussions whatever over the years i got to know a lot of just the
1:41:06
the more blue-collar people working in there the cameraman the techs uh the editors
1:41:13
these are just hard-working people in media who saw their jobs just terminated
1:41:18
overnight out of nowhere and you know i don't know where they're going to wind up next um
1:41:25
and it was a very unique network i mean that you could i it was the only network in town where i could actually
1:41:31
talk about think tanks like the atlantic council being funded by the arms industry and
1:41:36
you know generating the banging the war drums it was you know the only place that
1:41:42
hosted a left-wing anti-imperialist comedy show with the live studio audience and with the uh you know
1:41:49
lockdowns and quarantines the studio audience went away uh that was hosted by lee camp then we saw lee have his
1:41:56
um ability to even get likes on youtube taken away by youtube uh facebook took
1:42:02
away the ability to get likes the algorithm just crushed that show and now you know lee has had his entire archive
1:42:09
removed i mean the entire archive of breaking the set has been removed by youtube
1:42:15
lee's show at spotify which had nothing to do with rt america was taken away so it is a straight-up attack on
1:42:22
journalists and journalism and all the correspondents at rt america the higher profile ones um
1:42:28
or caleb maupin at rt but rachel blevins at rt america they were labeled
1:42:34
russian state-affiliated media on their personal twitter pages
1:42:39
uh that was to kind of intimidate them i think and caused them to quit before rt
1:42:45
america um closed up shop abruptly
1:42:50
but uh you know and there's been of course no solidarity or outcry from anyone else in u.s media
1:42:57
because you know we we have to hate tchaikovsky we have to hate
1:43:03
all russian culture russian people who have nothing to do with the kremlin are now being targeted so naturally rt
1:43:10
would would would be in the crosshairs
1:43:15
there's a lot to say about it and um you know sputnik still broadcasts in
1:43:22
washington dc on fm uh it's still
1:43:28
it's still sort of there but the washington post has basically been broadcasting calls for it to be banned
1:43:33
as well the first amendment is not it it does it doesn't exist anymore
1:43:40
the u.s government is waging an information war and it is effectively merged with corporate media and if you
1:43:47
look at what is happening to julian assange where his appeals are being shot down one after another while all these
1:43:53
bbc journalists and journalists in washington are cheering for a woman who protested on russia's state channel one
1:44:00
against the war just ignoring julian assange and what their own country is doing
1:44:05
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:44:11
and the attacks on tucker carlson are very interesting we're seeing calls for him to be put on
1:44:17
track file on the top eight of the view and be
1:44:23
investigated for kremlin ties because he is interrogating the whole issue of u.s
1:44:28
backed bio labs in ukraine and as i said before i think part of removing part of
1:44:34
the logic of removing rt from youtube getting it off the airwaves was booted off directv as well
1:44:42
and the attacks on tucker carlson are to prevent a counter narrative if there is a dumas-style staged event
1:44:49
where that event can trigger possible western intervention in ukraine and that really
1:44:56
highlights the danger of not having a counter narrative that allows people to think i mean when remember the skripal
1:45:02
poisoning in salisbury england it was really only rt
1:45:08
that provided a counter narrative to the immediate claim that you know russia had waged a chemical attack on nato soil and
1:45:15
it triggered article 5. so yeah and we get attacked here as well
1:45:20
in the same way but you have someone on national tv speaking before a national audience it's the highest rated cable
1:45:28
news show who is talking about u.s sponsored
1:45:33
bio labs in ukraine which could have produced potentially a bio weapon and
1:45:39
just ripping to shreds the official narrative it's a major threat and they
1:45:44
don't know what to do with them uh except to call for complete censorship
ALL OF THIS IS VERY GOOD THINKING AND INFO PROVISION
INFLUENCE OF EXTREME RIGHT NATIONALIST FASCISTS NEO-NAZIS IN US POLITICS
CUBANS VENEZUELANS EL SALVADORANS AND UKRAINIANS .... AND POST-WW2 NAZI IMMIGRANTS BY CIA
1:45:49
now basically uh we had another question on you know as of getting asylum
1:45:56
i don't know about as of battalion getting asylum from the u.s but we have seen
1:46:02
various waves of uh what of um
1:46:08
we've seen there is a history of the cia providing asylum
1:46:14
to nazi war criminals like mikola lebed who was involved in the extermination of
1:46:21
jews in nazi-controlled ukraine he was set up with his own private printing press called prologue which was
1:46:28
an anti-communist ukrainian publication sponsored by the cia he ran
1:46:33
it out of a flat uh in the lower east side of new york and you know we know about operation
1:46:41
paperclip we know about all these rat lines you do have a lobby in the u.s
1:46:46
which is if you look at the work of moss robeson who's worked for the gray zone
1:46:52
contributed to the gray zone basically the ounb network set up by stephan
1:46:58
bandera and these nazi collaborators repurposed into essentially a ukrainian
1:47:03
diaspora lobby but they are a bandera lobby that supports
1:47:08
the extremist side of the ukrainian political spectrum and seeks to manipulate u.s politics in order to
1:47:16
drive a direct u.s confrontation with what was once the soviet union and now
1:47:22
is russia they were originally the anti-bolshevik network and now they have a kind of a series of kind of ukrainian
1:47:29
lobbying organizations it's very dangerous and we're going to see
1:47:34
as we saw you know with the destabilization of other countries whether you know
1:47:41
cuba el salvador a massive migration wave there has been a huge migration wave to the west since
1:47:48
2014 since the maidan coup and we'll see another migration wave and those lobbies will increase their power
1:47:54
by uh inculcating these new migrants into uh their
1:48:00
their mentality of direct confrontation retribution for what has been done to us
1:48:06
the venezuelan lobby got beefed up massively after venezuela was sanctioned
1:48:11
and economically destabilized these past years and it helped contribute to trump's victory in florida so now you
1:48:17
have uh basically biden is going to lose florida and it's
1:48:23
partly because not only of the demographic shift there lots of right-wing colombians who
1:48:30
hate the democrats and now right-wing venezuelans who hate maduro biden went and negotiated with maduro
1:48:39
over the protest of the miami cuban and venezuelan lobby so that's off the table
1:48:45
you have growing ukrainian populations that are more politically mobilized than ever we have seen them in washington
1:48:51
here they have huge rallies like almost every weekend in ohio
1:48:56
in minnesota and across swing states
1:49:03
but especially ohio minnesota i believe michigan actually if you remember that fateful
1:49:10
meeting where john mccain lindsey and lindsey graham went to meet with a right like an extremist ukrainian power
1:49:15
military the idarb italian or was it the nepro battalion and lindsey graham called for um you know a war the
1:49:22
following year amy klobuchar was with them because she has a lot of
1:49:27
ukrainian americans in her district so that lobby is going to increase its power and increase its pressure and the
1:49:33
democrats are trying to ride that lobby this is you know just my take
1:49:38
uh to victory in 2024 to offset their losses in florida because they are in swing
1:49:45
districts
ITS ALL QUITE SICK IMHO ..... TWISTED N HYPOCRITICAL LYING BULLSHIT ... BUT WHATEVER; IT IS WHAT IT IS
AND IF PEOPLE ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE SO GULLIBLE AND MANIPULATED OR FIGHT BACK AGGRESSIVELY THEN THATS WHAT HAPPENS IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ... PEOPLE WILL BE HURT N KILLED. IT'S WHAT HAPPENS EVERYWHERE ALL THE TIME - AMERICA IS NOT IMMUNE TO CHAOS
US CONTROLLING NEGOTIATIONS WITH PUTIN ..... NOT ZELENSKY

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

it's a good question because he's basically the the underlying presumption which is
1:52:00
accurate is that essentially zolensky cannot act without us approval or even u.s orders and so it's good for that to
1:52:07
be pressed to the white house just to make it clear that at least some members of the media know that that's what the
1:52:12
dynamic is here uh instead of just this this image we're getting of zolensky leading this uh
1:52:18
war effort and the u.s is just there to you know support him whatever he wants which is just not the case the us is deliberately fueling
1:52:25
this proxy where it has major leverage over whatever decision zelinski makes
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:37:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
continuing the copy/paste [rave]
nothing that my CAPS are only for emphasis of key words and to note my own add in comments FWIW
ok so now max talks about neo-nazi groups issues in ukraine ....
1:24:12
i was i mentioned this debate i was in with um a UKRAINIAN LEGISLATOR named INA
1:24:18
SOBSON on on cgtn america the other day and it's one of the few you know they have this program called the heat it's
1:24:24
one of the few places where i can actually you know mix it up with establishment figures and think
1:24:30
tankers and it usually doesn't work out too well for them but you know it if you actually kind of prod them a
1:24:37
little bit it exposes what they're really about and after some prodding this legislator
1:24:43
ina selson said she only favors a military solution there is only one solution against russia it is military
1:24:50
and the us needs to intervene to do that work and therefore you know she started bringing up russia's potential chemical
1:24:56
attack and was really upset that nato hadn't done it yet
so i looked her up
1:25:01
it turns out well actually we had gotten into an exchange where she was DENYING the presence of
1:25:07
ukrainian NEO-NAZIS she's like "you're talking about nazis when we're being bombed and how could you talk about
1:25:13
nazis?" and it's like this seems to be kind of part of the equation here
uh have you heard of andre perubi
1:25:20
and she said yeah but he hasn't been THE SPEAKER of the ukrainian RADA for three years and i said so you have A GUY who
1:25:26
FOUNDED TWO NEO-NAZI PARTIES who was the speaker of the ukrainian
1:25:32
PARLIAMENT that's pretty significant
and i looked her up and she had actually DONE RALLIES
1:25:37
recently with PERUBI and people from poroshenko's party the former president AGAINST
1:25:45
ZELENSKI they called it RED LINE for ZELENSKY and they're having huge ULTRA NATIONALIST RALLIES IN KIEV against the
1:25:52
MINSK AGREEMENT and any attempt at pulling WITHDRAWING the nationalist forces from the GRAYZONE around the
1:26:00
DONBAS AREA so zielinski was under CONSTANT DOMESTIC PRESSURE and when we hear uh all of this you know you look at
1:26:07
your twitter sidebar it'll say zelinski has SURVIVED 14 ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS you think like russia's sending him
1:26:13
exploding cigars no the people who wanted to assassinate zielinski were the ULTRANATIONALISTS it were the people who
1:26:20
had been incorporated into not just the ukrainian NATIONAL GUARD but LIEV CITY
1:26:26
council was using them to ATTACK MIGRANTS AND ROMANI people
1:26:32
um they were working hand in glove with the interior ministry
1:26:37
the NATIONAL CORE OF THE AZOV BATTALIAN to intimidate and control politics so he was under a
1:26:45
massive internal pressure
actually amnesty international in ukraine issued a report in 2018
1:26:50
about these forces they never translated it into english for obvious reasons
1:26:56
and they said as long as these ultranationalist forces maintain
1:27:01
so much influence in ukraine no one in ukrainian society is safe so that would include the president i think he never
1:27:08
had any power - ZELENSKI basically you know IS A justin bieber for the believers in the
1:27:13
western press corps and the beltway hacks who think ukraine can win this war
1:27:20
you look at the press conferences it's like they're ready to throw their
1:27:25
panties at him it's disgusting uh and he's loving that role but he has NO DOMESTIC POWER IN UKRAINE and
1:27:33
i mean where are ukrainians who want to fight this war turning to
1:27:38
they're fight they're turning towards the people who are fighting in mariupol like the azov battalion
1:27:44
that th that they're not turning towards zolansky so i don't know how he can negotiate but we
1:27:51
can see from my the piece i did with alex he hasn't been able to negotiate even
1:27:56
with the forces in his own society how's he going to negotiate a deal with russia ???? - it's tragic
1:28:02
it's really tragic
THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN THE USA INTERFERES IN NATIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS AT LEAST
YOU GET CHAOS VIOLENCE AND LIES AND CORRUPTION AND DEATH AND INJUSTICE
ON GEORGE SOROS [AND WESTERN/JEWISH OLIGARCHS LIKE HIM ]
WHO FUNDED ZELENSKI INTO OFFICE IN 2019 & THE AZOV BATTALION MOVEMENT ????
Q--
max one thing i want to ask you uh colonel mcgregor mentioned george soros
1:28:46
in the context of ukraine and often when we hear george soros's name
1:28:51
they can come in the form of either you know anti-semitic conspiracy theories or they also can come
1:28:57
in the realm of uh real things and so in the case of ukraine
1:29:02
has soros had an influence in terms of manufacturing uh the uh the REGIME
1:29:08
CHANGE operation that happened in 2014 and other related efforts to basically turn ukraine into a NATO Colony
A ---
1:29:15
well definitely i mean you know the answer to that i mean right now the big player in ukraine
1:29:22
would be zielinski's money man igor kolomoisky who's one of the MOST CORRUPT MEN on the planet funded
1:29:28
zielinski while he funded the azov battalion uh basically funded zielinski's career
1:29:34
through these shell accounts that showed up in the PANDORA PAPERS and still is wielding influence i would assume over
1:29:41
negotiations
but uh soros i mean when did he last kind of turn up in the news it was
1:29:47
JUST BEFORE the Russian operation in ukraine during another event that the world's
1:29:54
eyes were focused on which was the winter OLYMPICS in beijing and he used that occasion to call for REGIME CHANGE
1:30:00
in BEIJING CHINA and the DIOWNFALL of xi jinping so that's i mean he just he's
1:30:07
just out there saying it !!!!!!!!!!!!
GEORGE SOROS s i think the main funder of the new york
1:30:14
review of books which is the um the literary political review of the
1:30:21
bien penson liberal intelligentsia in new york and he whenever he wants he can write an
1:30:27
article there and every time he does IT'S TO CALL FOR REGIME CHANGE IN A NEW PLACE
i remember he said you know it's
1:30:32
really important that we have regime change in SYRIA in order to STOP PUTIN
He wrote a piece prior to that declaring
1:30:38
that PUTIN WAS WORSE THAN ISIS TERRORISTS He's been OBSSESSED and what does
1:30:43
do well he is one of the OVERT OPERATORS identified in the 1991 washington post
1:30:50
column by david ignatius who's one of the CIA'S KIND OF FAVOURITE CHANNELS IN US MEDIA
1:30:57
one of the overt operators DOING THE WORK THE CIA USED TO DO COVERTLY IN THE OPEN
1:31:03
ignatius also identified the national endowment for democracy uh he you know uh he gave a pat on the back to the
1:31:09
afl-cio i would call the afl-cia which is now clamoring for SANCTIONS ON
1:31:15
RUSSIAN WORKERS and all of these other channels for SOFT POWER and u.s influence
1:31:22
and he foreshadowed in that column the the coming COLOR REVOLUTIONS
1:31:27
uh that would TOPPLE GOVERNMENTS that were still friendly or maintain good diplomatic
1:31:33
TIES WITH RUSSIA after the soviet union the first one was uh edward shevandartzi the former foreign minister to
1:31:39
mikhail gorbachev who was president of GEORGIA and his replacement with the CIA ASSETT ultimately mikhail sakashvili who
1:31:47
led georgia into direct military confrontation with russia over south ossetia [[ LATER GOVERNOR OF ODESSA UNDER POROSHENKO UKRAINE GOVT - A CIA / NATO SHILL NUT CASE ]
1:31:53
SOROS is funding the civil society groups through his open societies foundations as an overt operator he's funding the
1:32:01
young people who you know getting them like they'll come out in in us in a town square in tibilisi or kiev and they all show up in
1:32:08
the same color pancho you know it's someone like soros WHO'S PAYING for that along with the
1:32:14
OPPOSITION MEDIA [ UKRAINES CURRENT GLOBAL PR PROPAGANDA OPERATION IN THE MEDIA ??? ]
we saw a outlet called romanski if you're watching it's spelled
1:32:20
h-r-o-m-a-d-s-k-e if you want to look it up this cropped up over popped up overnight
1:32:27
to support the MAIDAN uh so-called revolution of dignity the coup attempt in 2013 2014 and it was
1:32:34
sponsored by soros and also pierre omidyar which is really interesting because you know he controls the
1:32:40
INTERCEPT MEDIA OUTLET [ THAT GREENWALD QUIT IN DISGUST ] and they're writing about ukraine without acknowledging that THEIR FUNDER / OWNER HAD A DIRECT HAND IN
1:32:47
THE UKRAINE COUP OF 2014 that took us to where we are TODAY
so that's why i think GEORGE SOROS is such a
1:32:53
is considered THE DEVIL EVERYWHERE from hungary to russia and all of these laws
1:32:59
are introduced TO BAN NGOS -- HRW human rights watch being the largest ngo that uh
1:33:04
SOROS FUNDS and then the west counters and says oh they're anti-democratic they're trying to ban human rights
1:33:10
groups they won't allow a civil society and ANY CRITICISM OF SOROS is deemed ANTI-SEMITIC [ HOW CONVENIENT IS THAT ? ]
1:33:17
so i'm sure everyone watching kind of knew that history you knew the answer to your
1:33:22
own question but i'm glad we kind of got into it um and you know it is it is
1:33:29
interesting that i mean i SOROS FUNDS through his network a large swath
1:33:34
of "PROGRESSIVE MEDIA" so they kind of take a liberal INTERVENTIONIST LINE i don't
1:33:40
think george soros is like you must do this or you will all be fired
but i can tell you aaron like i feel like more
1:33:47
candid than i was able to be in the past i'll tell you two stories about soros
1:33:53
i guess i'll tell the 5500 people watching as well number one one outlet i i used to frequently write
1:34:01
for a progressive outlet won't name it i was actually told we can't publish pieces about soros and
1:34:08
what he's doing with you know funding and regime change ngos we got to stay away from that because they were
1:34:13
courting his people at the time for funding so that it that does happen
1:34:19
um my second story is that i was in a i mean i don't want to give all the
1:34:24
details because i don't want to like embarrass certain individual people but i was in uh middle eastern city
1:34:33
during the latter phases of the so-called arab spring which some called the sunni
1:34:39
winter and i went i went out to dinner
1:34:45
it was a pretty nice dinner in a society that was becoming increasingly impoverished
1:34:51
and one of SOROS' GUYS showed up he was the head of the open society foundations
1:34:58
for the middle east i think or not the head but he was working there they didn't have an office in this
1:35:03
country i said what are you doing here and he said well THE LABOUR UNIONS HAVE TOO MUCH CONTROL and WE WANT things to
1:35:10
open up here economically we want a more dynamic society and so uh we're working on uh you know
1:35:16
encouraging some political changes and i kind of like made a joke i was like what are you gonna do like FUND PROTESTS
1:35:22
or something and he kind of nodded i was like that's crazy l
Like this is
1:35:28
real it's really happening and you know just talking to some of the younger english-speaking TECHNOCRATS
1:35:34
in this society they were all saying the SAME THINGS like the labor unions have too much power they're they're just
1:35:40
they're just stopping us from moving forward and TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE have these PENSIONS and these old jobs from
1:35:45
the previous regime so that's really like what he's done and that's called LIBERALIZATION
1:35:52
but to me it's like the ultimate form of MEDDLING and it's someone who really
1:35:58
i mean i don't know what country he claims to represent hungary the U.S. what it seems like HE REPRESENTS JUST GLOBAL CAPITALISM
FREE PRESS? RT BANNED ?
US & MEDIA JOURNOS RESPONSES TO JULIAN ASSANGE/WIKILEAKS VS RUSSIAN TV WOMAN WITH ANTI-WAR SIGN
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:39:26
what happened well i just it's just you know this was exactly normalized by russia gate where anything deemed to be
1:39:32
russian disinformation associated with russia was inherently nefarious and
1:39:38
this uh crisis this invasion of ukraine gave them the pretext to essentially wipe off
1:39:44
the airwaves a countervailing narrative that doesn't mean that rt was always 100
1:39:49
factual or that they didn't promote uh russian propaganda i'm sure they did but what they also did is presented a point
1:39:57
of view that was banned on u.s airways that was a counterweight especially on issues like syria
1:40:03
um and many other important geopolitical issues and it just i'm just uh it's amazing to me how
1:40:09
everyone or a lot of people immediately sort of either applauded this or shrugged and i'll be right back next i'll be
1:40:15
right back yeah um and i want to get this question
1:40:20
up to um when do i expect biden to give asylum to
1:40:26
the azov battalion i've actually been thinking about this a little bit
1:40:32
well on the question of rt uh rt america
1:40:38
was not banned by the u.s government it was a casualty
1:40:44
of the sanctions of the u.s attack on the ruble
1:40:50
and uh it was very abrupt so what was really sad about it for me
1:40:55
you know because i'd been in their studios just i'd come in as a guest to comment on my pieces or i'd participate
1:41:00
in panel discussions whatever over the years i got to know a lot of just the
1:41:06
the more blue-collar people working in there the cameraman the techs uh the editors
1:41:13
these are just hard-working people in media who saw their jobs just terminated
1:41:18
overnight out of nowhere and you know i don't know where they're going to wind up next um
1:41:25
and it was a very unique network i mean that you could i it was the only network in town where i could actually
1:41:31
talk about think tanks like the atlantic council being funded by the arms industry and
1:41:36
you know generating the banging the war drums it was you know the only place that
1:41:42
hosted a left-wing anti-imperialist comedy show with the live studio audience and with the uh you know
1:41:49
lockdowns and quarantines the studio audience went away uh that was hosted by lee camp then we saw lee have his
1:41:56
um ability to even get likes on youtube taken away by youtube uh facebook took
1:42:02
away the ability to get likes the algorithm just crushed that show and now you know lee has had his entire archive
1:42:09
removed i mean the entire archive of breaking the set has been removed by youtube
1:42:15
lee's show at spotify which had nothing to do with rt america was taken away so it is a straight-up attack on
1:42:22
journalists and journalism and all the correspondents at rt america the higher profile ones um
1:42:28
or caleb maupin at rt but rachel blevins at rt america they were labeled
1:42:34
russian state-affiliated media on their personal twitter pages
1:42:39
uh that was to kind of intimidate them i think and caused them to quit before rt
1:42:45
america um closed up shop abruptly
1:42:50
but uh you know and there's been of course no solidarity or outcry from anyone else in u.s media
1:42:57
because you know we we have to hate tchaikovsky we have to hate
1:43:03
all russian culture russian people who have nothing to do with the kremlin are now being targeted so naturally rt
1:43:10
would would would be in the crosshairs
1:43:15
there's a lot to say about it and um you know sputnik still broadcasts in
1:43:22
washington dc on fm uh it's still
1:43:28
it's still sort of there but the washington post has basically been broadcasting calls for it to be banned
1:43:33
as well the first amendment is not it it does it doesn't exist anymore
1:43:40
the u.s government is waging an information war and it is effectively merged with corporate media and if you
1:43:47
look at what is happening to julian assange where his appeals are being shot down one after another while all these
1:43:53
bbc journalists and journalists in washington are cheering for a woman who protested on russia's state channel one
1:44:00
against the war just ignoring julian assange and what their own country is doing
1:44:05
it's pretty obvious we don't have a free press anymore this is just kind of the nail in the coffin
1:44:11
and the attacks on tucker carlson are very interesting we're seeing calls for him to be put on
1:44:17
track file on the top eight of the view and be
1:44:23
investigated for kremlin ties because he is interrogating the whole issue of u.s
1:44:28
backed bio labs in ukraine and as i said before i think part of removing part of
1:44:34
the logic of removing rt from youtube getting it off the airwaves was booted off directv as well
1:44:42
and the attacks on tucker carlson are to prevent a counter narrative if there is a dumas-style staged event
1:44:49
where that event can trigger possible western intervention in ukraine and that really
1:44:56
highlights the danger of not having a counter narrative that allows people to think i mean when remember the skripal
1:45:02
poisoning in salisbury england it was really only rt
1:45:08
that provided a counter narrative to the immediate claim that you know russia had waged a chemical attack on nato soil and
1:45:15
it triggered article 5. so yeah and we get attacked here as well
1:45:20
in the same way but you have someone on national tv speaking before a national audience it's the highest rated cable
1:45:28
news show who is talking about u.s sponsored
1:45:33
bio labs in ukraine which could have produced potentially a bio weapon and
1:45:39
just ripping to shreds the official narrative it's a major threat and they
1:45:44
don't know what to do with them uh except to call for complete censorship
ALL OF THIS IS VERY GOOD THINKING AND INFO PROVISION
INFLUENCE OF EXTREME RIGHT NATIONALIST FASCISTS NEO-NAZIS IN US POLITICS
CUBANS VENEZUELANS EL SALVADORANS AND UKRAINIANS .... AND POST-WW2 NAZI IMMIGRANTS BY CIA
1:45:49
now basically uh we had another question on you know as of getting asylum
1:45:56
i don't know about as of battalion getting asylum from the u.s but we have seen
1:46:02
various waves of uh what of um
1:46:08
we've seen there is a history of the cia providing asylum
1:46:14
to nazi war criminals like mikola lebed who was involved in the extermination of
1:46:21
jews in nazi-controlled ukraine he was set up with his own private printing press called prologue which was
1:46:28
an anti-communist ukrainian publication sponsored by the cia he ran
1:46:33
it out of a flat uh in the lower east side of new york and you know we know about operation
1:46:41
paperclip we know about all these rat lines you do have a lobby in the u.s
1:46:46
which is if you look at the work of moss robeson who's worked for the gray zone
1:46:52
contributed to the gray zone basically the ounb network set up by stephan
1:46:58
bandera and these nazi collaborators repurposed into essentially a ukrainian
1:47:03
diaspora lobby but they are a bandera lobby that supports
1:47:08
the extremist side of the ukrainian political spectrum and seeks to manipulate u.s politics in order to
1:47:16
drive a direct u.s confrontation with what was once the soviet union and now
1:47:22
is russia they were originally the anti-bolshevik network and now they have a kind of a series of kind of ukrainian
1:47:29
lobbying organizations it's very dangerous and we're going to see
1:47:34
as we saw you know with the destabilization of other countries whether you know
1:47:41
cuba el salvador a massive migration wave there has been a huge migration wave to the west since
1:47:48
2014 since the maidan coup and we'll see another migration wave and those lobbies will increase their power
1:47:54
by uh inculcating these new migrants into uh their
1:48:00
their mentality of direct confrontation retribution for what has been done to us
1:48:06
the venezuelan lobby got beefed up massively after venezuela was sanctioned
1:48:11
and economically destabilized these past years and it helped contribute to trump's victory in florida so now you
1:48:17
have uh basically biden is going to lose florida and it's
1:48:23
partly because not only of the demographic shift there lots of right-wing colombians who
1:48:30
hate the democrats and now right-wing venezuelans who hate maduro biden went and negotiated with maduro
1:48:39
over the protest of the miami cuban and venezuelan lobby so that's off the table
1:48:45
you have growing ukrainian populations that are more politically mobilized than ever we have seen them in washington
1:48:51
here they have huge rallies like almost every weekend in ohio
1:48:56
in minnesota and across swing states
1:49:03
but especially ohio minnesota i believe michigan actually if you remember that fateful
1:49:10
meeting where john mccain lindsey and lindsey graham went to meet with a right like an extremist ukrainian power
1:49:15
military the idarb italian or was it the nepro battalion and lindsey graham called for um you know a war the
1:49:22
following year amy klobuchar was with them because she has a lot of
1:49:27
ukrainian americans in her district so that lobby is going to increase its power and increase its pressure and the
1:49:33
democrats are trying to ride that lobby this is you know just my take
1:49:38
uh to victory in 2024 to offset their losses in florida because they are in swing
1:49:45
districts
ITS ALL QUITE SICK IMHO ..... TWISTED N HYPOCRITICAL LYING BULLSHIT ... BUT WHATEVER; IT IS WHAT IT IS
AND IF PEOPLE ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE SO GULLIBLE AND MANIPULATED OR FIGHT BACK AGGRESSIVELY THEN THATS WHAT HAPPENS IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ... PEOPLE WILL BE HURT N KILLED. IT'S WHAT HAPPENS EVERYWHERE ALL THE TIME - AMERICA IS NOT IMMUNE TO CHAOS
US CONTROLLING NEGOTIATIONS WITH PUTIN ..... NOT ZELENSKY
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
it's a good question because he's basically the the underlying presumption which is
1:52:00
accurate is that essentially zolensky cannot act without us approval or even u.s orders and so it's good for that to
1:52:07
be pressed to the white house just to make it clear that at least some members of the media know that that's what the
1:52:12
dynamic is here uh instead of just this this image we're getting of zolensky leading this uh
1:52:18
war effort and the u.s is just there to you know support him whatever he wants which is just not the case the us is deliberately fueling
1:52:25
this proxy where it has major leverage over whatever decision zelinski makes
SIDE REPORT

Jake Sullivan fails to split China & Russia. China warns US on Taiwan
March 16, 2022 • 16 min
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-the-duran-podcast-43087093/episode/jake-sullivan-fails-to-split-china-94182852/

US fails to trap China over Ukraine at Yang-Sullivan meeting
By Chen Qingqing
and Fan Anqi Published: Mar 15, 2022
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202203/1254976.shtml
On the same day as a seven-hour meeting between senior Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi and US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan in Rome on Monday which was described by some media outlets as "intense," US Air Force General Kenneth Wilsbach blatantly threatened to teach China a lesson from the Ukraine situation, which could be applied to the Taiwan question. Such conceit was defied by the first direct high-level engagement between Chinese and US officials over the situation in Ukraine on which Washington had tried to misguide Beijing to serve its own interests, although failing to do so as the Chinese side stressed its consistent stance on the issue and urged the US side to correct its wrong words and deeds.

Ahead of the meeting, the US has been constantly spreading disinformation about China's role in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and some US officials tried to mix the Ukraine crisis with the Taiwan question, trying to hijack China over the issues and portraying a false image of the "China-Russia alliance." All these ill-intentioned tactics, in the eyes of Chinese experts, reflect little goodwill from the US for constructive talks while its contradiction between its words and deeds dampens the prospects of a healthy and stable China-US relationship.

Hours after the meeting between Yang and Sullivan finished, China released an 850-word readout reiterating its stance on core issues such as the Taiwan question and the current situation in Ukraine. In rejecting Washington's continuous pressure on misleading Beijing over the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Yang called for taking a long-term view, actively advocating a vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, encouraging relevant parties to conduct equal-footed dialogue, and set up a balanced, effective and sustainable European security framework based on the principle of indivisible security in a bid to preserve peace in Europe and around the world.

"The Chinese side resolutely opposes any words and deeds that spread false information, or distort and discredit China's position," he said.

On the heels of the high-level meeting, some US media outlets, citing unnamed US officials, hyped the role of China in the crisis by saying that "Russia asked China to give it military equipment and support for the war," and based on that disinformation, Sullivan expressed "deep concerns" about China's close ties with Russia during the meeting.

In addition, some other Western media outlets also hyped China's willingness to provide "military assistance to Russia," and before the meeting with Yang, Sullivan warned the so-called consequences if China helps Russia evade Western sanctions.

Some Chinese experts believe that the Rome meeting was an occasion for the senior Chinese official to straightforwardly lay out the country's consistent position on the Ukraine issue, when the US-led West continued to pressure China to "pick a side." Not only has the US failed to understand the essence of the China-Russia relationship, it also maliciously connected the Ukraine crisis with the Taiwan question, despite the different nature of the two issues, some experts said, noting that with the strategic composure, China has not fallen into this trap.

Failed trap

Although the Ukraine issue was a priority for the US during Monday's meeting to pressure China to take a stand, it seems the attempt was unsuccessful, Wu Xinbo, dean of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

"Not only did China's position remain unchanged, but it also refuted the rumors and false information the US was spreading. It means that the goal of the US for this meeting has failed," Wu said.
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:52:44 UTC
Permalink
On Saturday, 19 March 2022 at 12:37:52 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:

MORE FROM
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.

http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc

let
1:56:22
it go to his head and now germany is is really screwed and you were screwed
1:56:28
here in the u.s and we're totally screwed we're completely screwed
1:56:33
i don't know if people understand how screwed we are the ga and as as as doug mcgregor said gas prices
1:56:41
are a lagging indicator the biden administration had been saying it's fed the fed had been saying that inflation
1:56:48
was transitory and now they're gonna have to raise rates uh they're gonna have to you know pump
1:56:53
more money into the economy inflation is going to go up mortgage price
1:56:59
mortgages are going to have to are going to go up home buying will become more elusive for anyone who's left in the
1:57:04
american middle class young people you will own nothing and be happy and that doesn't mean you live in a
1:57:10
socialist paradise it means you're just going to be renting for the rest of your life or living in your parents basement
1:57:16
food prices are going through the roof you can already see it uh we're in we're so we're sanctioning
1:57:22
ourselves and what the biden administration is banking on is that we're so stupid that our brains have
1:57:28
been so infested with neocon worms since russiagate that we will blame putin for
1:57:34
all of this as though it was absolutely necessary to sanction oil our government's job and the america
1:57:40
firsters are right about this is to take care of its own people to take care of the american people people in this
1:57:46
country not to take care of ukrainians that's not their job and what they're doing is betraying them
1:57:53
in order to wage this uh maniacal was wilsonian conquest
1:57:58
thousands of miles away in order to defeat the uh shirtless horde bareback
1:58:04
horse riding conservative uh evildoer in putin
1:58:09
and it's like putin's price hike where are the anti-war groups
1:58:14
to make the connection here between high gas prices which are affecting the american working
1:58:20
class affecting even the working poor the uber drivers
1:58:26
the the front line workers and connect that to this war party
1:58:32
to the crazy sanctions that are being applied on russia or the sanctions on venezuela or the sanctions on iran where
1:58:39
are they they're stuck in boutique elite left greeniac
1:58:44
delusions and they some of them as we see from like naomi klein's tweets
1:58:49
are welcoming this moment it's a shock doctrine to guide and accelerate the transition into a green future which as
1:58:56
we know is not so green because all those electric batteries require tons of mining so i know this for a fact that
1:59:03
some of the main anti-war groups are unable to actually uh complain
1:59:09
or or bemoan high gas prices because that would be petro-populism yeah i saw bill
1:59:15
mckibben who's a leading environmentalist sort of pushed this line that instead of from him like
1:59:21
hearing a declaration that we should not be encouraging world war iii and should not be using ukraine as cannon fodder he
1:59:27
instead was talking about what a great opportunity this is to reduce our alliance on fossil fuels and sure i mean
1:59:33
i i support the general idea but to see this moment as about that and not about stopping nato expansion
1:59:40
stopping u.s hegemony stopping using ukraine for a suicidal proxy war against
1:59:45
russia that could literally lead to nuclear armageddon to me is just i mean myopic doesn't doesn't do it justice
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 01:57:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
MORE FROM
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
let
1:56:22
it go to his head and now germany is is really screwed and you were screwed
1:56:28
here in the u.s and we're totally screwed we're completely screwed
1:56:33
i don't know if people understand how screwed we are the ga and as as as doug mcgregor said gas prices
1:56:41
are a lagging indicator the biden administration had been saying it's fed the fed had been saying that inflation
1:56:48
was transitory and now they're gonna have to raise rates uh they're gonna have to you know pump
1:56:53
more money into the economy inflation is going to go up mortgage price
1:56:59
mortgages are going to have to are going to go up home buying will become more elusive for anyone who's left in the
1:57:04
american middle class young people you will own nothing and be happy and that doesn't mean you live in a
1:57:10
socialist paradise it means you're just going to be renting for the rest of your life or living in your parents basement
1:57:16
food prices are going through the roof you can already see it uh we're in we're so we're sanctioning
1:57:22
ourselves and what the biden administration is banking on is that we're so stupid that our brains have
1:57:28
been so infested with neocon worms since russiagate that we will blame putin for
1:57:34
all of this as though it was absolutely necessary to sanction oil our government's job and the america
1:57:40
firsters are right about this is to take care of its own people to take care of the american people people in this
1:57:46
country not to take care of ukrainians that's not their job and what they're doing is betraying them
1:57:53
in order to wage this uh maniacal was wilsonian conquest
1:57:58
thousands of miles away in order to defeat the uh shirtless horde bareback
1:58:04
horse riding conservative uh evildoer in putin
1:58:09
and it's like putin's price hike where are the anti-war groups
1:58:14
to make the connection here between high gas prices which are affecting the american working
1:58:20
class affecting even the working poor the uber drivers
1:58:26
the the front line workers and connect that to this war party
1:58:32
to the crazy sanctions that are being applied on russia or the sanctions on venezuela or the sanctions on iran where
1:58:39
are they they're stuck in boutique elite left greeniac
1:58:44
delusions and they some of them as we see from like naomi klein's tweets
1:58:49
are welcoming this moment it's a shock doctrine to guide and accelerate the transition into a green future which as
1:58:56
we know is not so green because all those electric batteries require tons of mining so i know this for a fact that
1:59:03
some of the main anti-war groups are unable to actually uh complain
1:59:09
or or bemoan high gas prices because that would be petro-populism yeah i saw bill
1:59:15
mckibben who's a leading environmentalist sort of pushed this line that instead of from him like
1:59:21
hearing a declaration that we should not be encouraging world war iii and should not be using ukraine as cannon fodder he
1:59:27
instead was talking about what a great opportunity this is to reduce our alliance on fossil fuels and sure i mean
1:59:33
i i support the general idea but to see this moment as about that and not about stopping nato expansion
1:59:40
stopping u.s hegemony stopping using ukraine for a suicidal proxy war against
1:59:45
russia that could literally lead to nuclear armageddon to me is just i mean myopic doesn't doesn't do it justice
LATE 2016 WAR MONGERING LYING MANIPULATIVE SENATORS MCAIN GRAHAM IN ULKRAINE .....

VIDEO http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc


2:00:13
well just we got to add it to the stream go ahead
2:00:18
[Music] you're fighting zarphy
2:00:24
2017 will be the year of offense
2:00:30
all of us will go back to washington and we will push the case against russia
2:00:39
[Music]
2:00:53
i believe you will win i am convinced you will win and we will do everything
2:00:59
we can to provide you with what you need to win yeah
2:01:13
so that's it i mean that's the guiding us policy that's in late 2016 these u.s senators along with the u.s ambassador
2:01:20
marie jabrenovich i'm sorry if i'm mispronouncing her name yeah yeah me who was an imp who was it
2:01:25
came to be a hero of the impeachment saga that's been the prevailing iranian ukrainian yes yes that's been the
2:01:32
prevailing u.s policy since uh since since late 2016 when they were there
2:01:37
and so in that context what do you expect to happen when u.s senators are openly saying that russia needs to pay a
2:01:44
heavier price and we're going to use this ukrainian proxy war to do that of course russia is going to eventually
2:01:50
respond and this is they've responded in the face of this of this invasion and
2:01:55
it's just amazing how this policy of using ukraine for that purpose of somehow deeming it normal for u.s
2:02:01
senators to go over to ukraine and announce to order them and tell them that russia has to pay a heavier price
2:02:07
to pretend that to pretend as if that wouldn't have consequences i mean imagine a russian general going over to canada where there's an insurgency
2:02:14
against uh the u.s or a u.s backed uh government and saying we're going to
2:02:20
help make the us pay a heavier price i mean the u.s would use nuclear weapons in that situation or the u.s would have
2:02:26
invaded a long time ago so the fact that this has been completely normalized speaks to how
2:02:34
powerful russiagate was because russia helped russia gate helped make this happen russiagate helped normalize a
2:02:39
policy that sees countries like ukraine as cannon fodder against russia and that as you talked about criminalizes any
2:02:45
diplomacy with russia that could avoid a catastrophic war like this
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 02:45:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Henosis Sage
MORE FROM
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
let
1:56:22
it go to his head and now germany is is really screwed and you were screwed
1:56:28
here in the u.s and we're totally screwed we're completely screwed
1:56:33
i don't know if people understand how screwed we are the ga and as as as doug mcgregor said gas prices
1:56:41
are a lagging indicator the biden administration had been saying it's fed the fed had been saying that inflation
1:56:48
was transitory and now they're gonna have to raise rates uh they're gonna have to you know pump
1:56:53
more money into the economy inflation is going to go up mortgage price
1:56:59
mortgages are going to have to are going to go up home buying will become more elusive for anyone who's left in the
1:57:04
american middle class young people you will own nothing and be happy and that doesn't mean you live in a
1:57:10
socialist paradise it means you're just going to be renting for the rest of your life or living in your parents basement
1:57:16
food prices are going through the roof you can already see it uh we're in we're so we're sanctioning
1:57:22
ourselves and what the biden administration is banking on is that we're so stupid that our brains have
1:57:28
been so infested with neocon worms since russiagate that we will blame putin for
1:57:34
all of this as though it was absolutely necessary to sanction oil our government's job and the america
1:57:40
firsters are right about this is to take care of its own people to take care of the american people people in this
1:57:46
country not to take care of ukrainians that's not their job and what they're doing is betraying them
1:57:53
in order to wage this uh maniacal was wilsonian conquest
1:57:58
thousands of miles away in order to defeat the uh shirtless horde bareback
1:58:04
horse riding conservative uh evildoer in putin
1:58:09
and it's like putin's price hike where are the anti-war groups
1:58:14
to make the connection here between high gas prices which are affecting the american working
1:58:20
class affecting even the working poor the uber drivers
1:58:26
the the front line workers and connect that to this war party
1:58:32
to the crazy sanctions that are being applied on russia or the sanctions on venezuela or the sanctions on iran where
1:58:39
are they they're stuck in boutique elite left greeniac
1:58:44
delusions and they some of them as we see from like naomi klein's tweets
1:58:49
are welcoming this moment it's a shock doctrine to guide and accelerate the transition into a green future which as
1:58:56
we know is not so green because all those electric batteries require tons of mining so i know this for a fact that
1:59:03
some of the main anti-war groups are unable to actually uh complain
1:59:09
or or bemoan high gas prices because that would be petro-populism yeah i saw bill
1:59:15
mckibben who's a leading environmentalist sort of pushed this line that instead of from him like
1:59:21
hearing a declaration that we should not be encouraging world war iii and should not be using ukraine as cannon fodder he
1:59:27
instead was talking about what a great opportunity this is to reduce our alliance on fossil fuels and sure i mean
1:59:33
i i support the general idea but to see this moment as about that and not about stopping nato expansion
1:59:40
stopping u.s hegemony stopping using ukraine for a suicidal proxy war against
1:59:45
russia that could literally lead to nuclear armageddon to me is just i mean myopic doesn't doesn't do it justice
LATE 2016 WAR MONGERING LYING MANIPULATIVE SENATORS MCAIN GRAHAM IN ULKRAINE .....
VIDEO http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
2:00:13
well just we got to add it to the stream go ahead
2:00:18
[Music] you're fighting zarphy
2:00:24
2017 will be the year of offense
2:00:30
all of us will go back to washington and we will push the case against russia
2:00:39
[Music]
2:00:53
i believe you will win i am convinced you will win and we will do everything
2:00:59
we can to provide you with what you need to win yeah
2:01:13
so that's it i mean that's the guiding us policy that's in late 2016 these u.s senators along with the u.s ambassador
2:01:20
marie jabrenovich i'm sorry if i'm mispronouncing her name yeah yeah me who was an imp who was it
2:01:25
came to be a hero of the impeachment saga that's been the prevailing iranian ukrainian yes yes that's been the
2:01:32
prevailing u.s policy since uh since since late 2016 when they were there
2:01:37
and so in that context what do you expect to happen when u.s senators are openly saying that russia needs to pay a
2:01:44
heavier price and we're going to use this ukrainian proxy war to do that of course russia is going to eventually
2:01:50
respond and this is they've responded in the face of this of this invasion and
2:01:55
it's just amazing how this policy of using ukraine for that purpose of somehow deeming it normal for u.s
2:02:01
senators to go over to ukraine and announce to order them and tell them that russia has to pay a heavier price
2:02:07
to pretend that to pretend as if that wouldn't have consequences i mean imagine a russian general going over to canada where there's an insurgency
2:02:14
against uh the u.s or a u.s backed uh government and saying we're going to
2:02:20
help make the us pay a heavier price i mean the u.s would use nuclear weapons in that situation or the u.s would have
2:02:26
invaded a long time ago so the fact that this has been completely normalized speaks to how
2:02:34
powerful russiagate was because russia helped russia gate helped make this happen russiagate helped normalize a
2:02:39
policy that sees countries like ukraine as cannon fodder against russia and that as you talked about criminalizes any
2:02:45
diplomacy with russia that could avoid a catastrophic war like this
WHAT AMERICAN NARCISSISTIC RABID TOXIC EXCEPTIONALISM IS DOING IS FORCING ITS VERSION OF GOVT N DEMOCRACY ON EVERY OTHER NATION ... IS WHAT THE FUCKING EVIL CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES [ AND SAUDI-OTTOMAN TURKS HAVE DONE ] DID ALL OVER THE WORLD .... IN AMERICA AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND AFRICA AND ASIA THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CENTURIES BRINGING DEATH DESTRUCTION BROKEN FAMILIES IMPRISONED TRIBES THEFT OF LAND AND WORSE ....

LEARN THE HISTORY ...... A MAJORITY OF UKRAINIANS DID NOT SUPPORT THE 2014 COUP OR JOINING NATO ... !!!!

lindsey graham is also one of the top
2:03:27
recipients of armin arms industry money he has bureaucratic in
2:03:33
financial incentive to keep pushing these wars but i also think there's just this
2:03:38
PSYCHOLOGICAL DELUSION THAT HAS INFESTED WASHINGTON
2:03:43
COLLECTIVELY but particularly among a certain
2:03:49
set or you could call THEM A [RELIGOUS/CULT] SECT and it's spelled out in the wolfowitz doctrine which calls for UNIPOLAR DOMINANCE
2:03:55 as paper that wolfowitz [ JEWISH ISRAELI NEOCON SYCHOPHANT ] produced when he was in the BUSH 1 PENTAGON
2:04:01
and it's this notion that russia after the cold war could be contained and HAD TO BE CONTAINED -- 1991 !!!!! PARANOID PSYCHOS - LIKE JOHN CLARK THE PSYCHO ON A.R.E. -- BAT SHIT CRAZY
had
2:04:07
to be contained and that means containment means denying it number one denying it a SPHERE of
2:04:13
influence which would mean its immediate periphery but also to
2:04:19
enter that sphere of influence and create what george kennen called the pressure
2:04:24
cooker effect uh to start destabilizing russia internally by military pressure on its
2:04:31
frontiers putting these dual use missile systems to pershing missiles and so on that can reach moscow and then pushing a
2:04:38
color revolution inside russia it hasn't worked 2008 should have been the time when
2:04:45
everyone saw and that this wasn't going to work when georgia got crushed in south ossetia


2:04:52
when putin showed he was willing to use military force he said he was going to do it a year before at the 2007 munich security conference [ Putin's famous Munich Speech 2007
]

he said DON'T PUSH ME/RUSSIA TOO FAR ...
2:04:59
OR I WILL PUSH BACK and NO ONE LISTENED [ HEEDED HIS WORDS ] It just made them so
2:05:04
upset they're just so and and it they IT MADE THEM DOUBLE DOWN IN 2008 IN GEORGIA [ UNDER BUSH II - THEN OBAMA ]
was the same year uh that the u.s declared that UKRAINE SHOULD BE PART OF NATO .. [ FUCKING INSANE ]

2:05:16
and i don't think most ukrainians wanted to be a part of nato at that point so
2:05:22
they did not know no there was a former uh nsc official
2:05:28
on the national security council who wrote in 2011 that the biggest obstacle to ukrainian's membership to nato is
2:05:35
ukrainian public opinion itself and that's why i think the coup happened in 2014 is because the us and the far
2:05:41
right inside ukraine were trying to accomplish what they could not get the ukrainian public to go along with so they had to
2:05:47
change their government and force it through and that's why the coup government immediately embraced nato membership and did all the things that
2:05:53
the ukrainian population was VERY DIVIDED over of course there there is a sizable contingent inside ukraine that
2:05:59
wants to join nato that wanted to join the eu but the country itself when you consider everybody not just those who
2:06:05
align with u.s interests was very very divided and that's why polls consistently showed DEEP DIVISION over
2:06:11
things like NATO & EU and by the way and this is according to the washington post at the time
2:06:17
when yanukovych ukrainian president was overthrown with u.s help at that time according to an article in the
2:06:23
washington post from that month he was still the most popular political figure in the country which is saying something because of
2:06:29
course tens of thousands of people did come out to protest him over his corruption and over uh his decision not
2:06:35
to sign the eu deal but still that just underscores the US [ UN- DEMOCRATIC AUTOCRATIC INTERFERENCE FASCIST ] POLICIES has been predicated on
2:06:42
IGNORING A SIZABLE gnoring a sizeable contingent of ukraine's population and refusing
2:06:47
REFUSING TO LET THE COUNTRY BE NEUTRAL forcing it to make a choice between
2:06:53
the western orbit and russia which IS AN INSANE IRRATIONAL POLICY in such A DIVIDED COUNTRY the answer in an invite in a divided
2:06:59
country that's on russia's borders is neutrality and it's been the u.s that's been leading the way to prevent that and


2:07:06
that's why carl gerschmann gershwin i say his name he declared in uh the fall of 2013 right
2:07:12
before the maidan that ukraine was quote THE BIGGEST PRIZE and that if ukraine could come into the
2:07:18
western orbit then that would redound to russia as well and that vladimir putin might find himself on the losing end as
2:07:24
well so basically he was saying that if ukraine could be brought into the western orbit then we could have maybe a quicker path to REGIME CHANGE IN MOSCOW
2:07:31
yeah this was THE HEAD OF [ SOROS' ] NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY publishing a call for regime change in the washington post regime change
2:07:39
in moscow not just ukraine which ultimately happened and set the stage
2:07:45
for you know as john mearsheimer said it put ukraine on the primrose path to war yeah um
2:07:53
what you your your point is really important the u.s supports ukraine on the
2:07:59
basis of its lack of democracy it being undemocratic
2:08:04
by disenfranchising its ethnic russian russian-speaking population that is why
2:08:11
the war raged in the danvas that is why people were massacred russian speakers
2:08:17
russian ethnic russians in odessa in at the trade union hall
2:08:23
that is why the u.s openly supported and celebrated
2:08:29
the banning of three opposition stations run by victor medvedchuk the leader of the
2:08:36
ethnic russian opposition party for life that is why the u.s supported medvedchuk's jailing and prosecution and
2:08:44
essentially the banning of his party the u.s was openly cheering on zielinski as he did that because the us did not
2:08:50
want a democratic ukraine because we have to remember the maidan so-called revolution of dignity was not supported
2:08:58
by a majority of ukrainians and it was designed to overthrow a democratically
2:09:03
elected albeit very corrupt president victor yanukovych a plurality supported
2:09:09
it not a majority and so the u.s wants a country that's very much like
2:09:14
its own an oligarchy not a democracy infested with ngos and a kind of uh
2:09:23
corrupt bureaucracy

AMERICA IS AN IMMORAL NAZI STATE RUN BY EVIL PATHOLOGICAL OLIGARCHS AND SUBSERVIENT VIOLENT LUNATICS

AMERICA IS A TORTURE STATE N EMPIRE OF EVIL AND DEATH WORLD WIDE .... AND THE US MEDIA JOURNALISTS ARE IT'S MOUTH PIECE OF PROPAGANDA
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 03:29:12 UTC
Permalink
On Saturday, 19 March 2022 at 13:45:19 UTC+11, Henosis Sage wrote:
FROM
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc


CLOSING COMMENTS
2:10:01
ON LEFTIE DEMOCRAT RO KHANNA --- Isaw him go into a cafe and i said you know he needs to to speak out against the us escalating
2:10:08
because he ran on that kind of platform so i waited for him he came out and i politely asked him some questions to
2:10:14
that effect he said to me something that i thought only
2:10:19
right-wingers during the first bush term would say " freedom isn't free this is about freedom and america is the best
2:10:25
country in the world and we've got to send in the stinger missiles "

this was the guy who was in 2018 pushing the BAN ON WEAPONS TO AZOV BATTALION AND to the AZEROTH Battalion doing so openly
2:10:36
uh tweeting about how azov was a NEO-NAZI battalion incorporated into ukrainian military he put the orange
2:10:42
revolution the color revolution in quotes like in scare quotes like he was HE WAS MOCKING THE WHOLE THING and now
2:10:48
HE'S JOINED THE WAR PARTY - THE UNIPARTY

as have so many of the other progressives AOC wearing her you know ukraine uh badge
2:10:56
during the state of the union and i guess the there was like a paper clip behind it for operation paper clip i
2:11:02
don't know but you know ILHAN OMAR has been sort of a very muted and as as one of the few critics her and
2:11:08
COERY BUSH are probably two of the only members of the squad who've put up any resistance to this

but then you have the whole AMERICA FIRST COALITION -- Nick Fuentes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Fuentes -- who are
2:11:15
saying and TUCKER CARLSON and all these figures who are saying this is NOT OUR FIGHT and they're being
2:11:21
called THE PUTIN WING OF THE GOP in washington -- [ THE INTERVENTIONIST LIBERALS / WAR PARTY ] THEY'RE FRIGHTENED OF THEM

and they're also frightened of them
2:11:27
because the democrats are going to get taken to the woodshed in the MIDTERMS and you're going to see a rise of
2:11:33
[ RIGHT WING ] POPULISM in the republican party there's NO WAY I can see the democrats holding
2:11:39
the white house with biden and kamala harris in there uh KAMALA HARRIS you know she makes
2:11:46
she makes like sarah palin look like hannah arendt i mean it's RIDICULOUS ...


2:11:51
so max by the way what did RO KHANA do after you challenged him in the interview which is up at thegrayzone.com
2:11:57
RO KHANA tweeted out this mccarthyite smear of you basically saying you were parroting RT talking points
2:12:04
he said basically that I WAS RT you were too yeah and which he then deleted but he never apologized for and he still
2:12:10
should if he has any....

i don't care if he apologizes i don't i don't accept his apology anyway i just wanted to i'm just
2:12:17
here to LIFT THE MASK you know there's been a mask mandate on
2:12:22
progressives in congress they've been wearing a PHONY VIRTUOUS MASK of being ANTI-WAR and ANTI-CAPITALIST and all the
2:12:30
stuff they say and I'M AGAINST THE PROGRESSIVE MASK MANDATE and that's what had to happen um and then
2:12:36
you see like also PHONY REPUBLICANS like maria elvira salazar getting exposed she's she's ALWAYS CLAMORING FOR WAR

2:12:43
she didn't even know what a no-fly zone was so i think we're seeing a real serious political transition in the u.s
2:12:49
and it's really because NEOLIBERALISM DID NOT WORK OUT FOR THE BASE THE REAL BASE of the republican party that had
2:12:55
always BEEN DUPED BY WEDGE ISSUES LIKE ABORTION and GAY MARRIAGE and so on they're still somewhat being duped and
2:13:01
you know but you're you're seeing just ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT RAGE and i think that
2:13:09
is one of the few things that will contribute to a kind of uh WEAKENING OF
2:13:15
of the LIBERAL INTERVENTIONIST and NEOCONSERVATIVE [CAPITALIST CORPORATE GLOBALIZATION INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN ANTI-RUSSIA ANTI-CHINA ] FORCES in washington at

2:13:20
least it's going to set the stage for another CONFRONTATION IN USA like the kind we saw during the TRUMP ERA when trump
2:13:26
effectively got rolled with the appointment of JOHN BOLTON so his appointment of john bolton his
2:13:32
appointment of john bolton yeah which speaks to mcgregor's point that you know he as he said today it's amazing to hear
2:13:38
a former trump senior official say this that uh trump was constantly undermined by the
2:13:43
PEOPLE TRUMP APPOINTED [ IDIOT CLOWN SHOES MORON ] yeah because then trump was just
2:13:48
he saw john bolton ON FOX and thought he was a good guy and you know he defended trump sometimes and
2:13:54
so trump also said like i liked having him in negotiations with
2:14:00
you know north korea or any other any other country because there was the threat of uh world war
2:14:06
three sitting across the room from them which IS JUST IDIOTIC [ THAT IS TRUMPTO THE CORE - AN IDIOT ] because [ WAR PARTY WARMONGERER ] Bolton's
2:14:12
main war was AGAINST TRUMP and for rehabilitating his own image in washington

so yeah that was on trump but anyway i
2:14:19
see another confrontation coming in washington and
2:14:25
it is really unfortunate that they're there there is THE LEFT IN THE US HAS BEEN HOLLOWED OUT [ AS HAVE THE UNIONS ]
:14:31
that they're not actually UNABLE TO POSE ANY THREAT TO THE WAR PARTY - UNIPARTY
2:14:37
in the state department and in congress [ IN THE DEEP STATE / INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ] and that they are part of it in some ways

2:14:45
all right well listen this has been a great chat thanks to everybody who has tuned in
2:14:50
this was a possibly a record for us max in terms of views over
2:14:55
5500 i think have been watching live which is great we really appreciate everyone's support

WHAT SHIT SHOW THE USA IS TODAY .... HAS BEEN FOR OVER 50 YEARS EASILY ... SINCE US ADVISORS ENTERED VIETNAM ... THE EVIL EMPIRE IS A JOKE AND IT IS GOING TO GO DOWN THE TOILET ... IT IS WHAT ALWAYS HAPPENES TO SHIT HOLES RUN BY CUNTS ....

LIKE THE UK TOTALLY LOST IT'S EMPIRE POST-WW2 EVEN THOUGH THEY TECHNICALLY WON THE WAR THEY FUCKING LOST.

THE UK IS GOING TO LOSE AGAIN THIS TIME ECONOMICALLY AND AS A RELEVANT VOICE IN THE WORLD

SO GOES AMERICA .... AFTER THE INITIAL SHOCK AND AWE IT WILL WOBBLE AND LOSE IT'S INFLUENCE TO A LARGE DEGREE .. BUT IT WILL STILL BE POWERFUL ... (AS THE UK REMAINED SO FOR A LONG TIME] DUE TO FINANCIAL WEALTH AND CONTROL OVER FINANCES GLOBALLY ] BUT IN TIME THAT SMALLER INFLUENCE WILL FAIL MORE AND MORE ... AMERICA WILL EAT IT ITSELF OUT FROM THE INSIDES .....

THE MYTH OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM , OF A MORAL GUIDE FOR THE WORLD IS BEING DESTROYED BY ITS VERY OWN IMMORALITY AND ABUSES OF POWER ..... MAY IT BE SO.

=====================

NOW REMEMBER 2014 IN UKRAINE .... WELL ANOTHER THING HAPPENED IN 2014

AUSTRALIA IS ANOTHER GULLIBLE PATSY TO THE USA IDIOCY

Dangerous Allies .... A GREAT BOOK FULL OF TRUTH N FACTS
Malcolm Fraser, Cain Roberts
We need the US for defence, but we only need defence because of the US

Australia has always been reliant on 'great and powerful friends' for its sense of national security and for direction on its foreign policy—first on the British Empire and now on the United States. Australia has actively pursued a policy of strategic dependence, believing that making a grand bargain with a powerful ally was the best policy to ensure its security and prosperity.

Dangerous Allies examines Australia's history of strategic dependence and questions the continuation of this position. It argues that international circumstances, in the world and in the Western Pacific especially, now make such a policy highly questionable. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States has also changed dramatically, making it less relevant to Australia and a less appropriate ally on which Australia should rely.

FORMER PRIME MINISTER - AND VIETNAM WAR DEFENSE MINISTER Malcolm Fraser argues that Australia should adopt a much greater degree of independence in foreign policy, and that we should no longer…
https://www.mup.com.au/books/dangerous-allies-electronic-book-text

Australia’s ‘Dangerous Allies’
A new book by former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser hopes to send Australia a wake-up call.
By Jared McKinney
July 10, 2014
https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/australias-dangerous-allies/

Review: Dangerous Allies by Malcolm Fraser Published 30 Jul 2014
By Heath Pickering
Malcolm Fraser occupies a unique place in Australian politics. A former conservative Prime Minister turned Greens sympathiser. A former Defence Minister during Australia’s involvement in Vietnam and now chief critic of the Australia-US alliance. This transformation is articulated in his new book, Dangerous Allies, where he argues that Australia’s close relationship with the United States is highly questionable in the post Cold War era. Contrary to popular belief, Fraser argues that forming alliances with “great and powerful friends” has led to “strategic dependence” and actually puts Australia in a more insecure position. Instead, he advocates for a more independent Australian foreign policy.
https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/news-item/review-dangerous-allies-by-malcolm-fraser/

AMERICA'S SELF-DESTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMING A LONG TIME ....
Henosis Sage
2022-03-19 03:34:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
FROM
Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor joins Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate for a candid, live discussion of the Russia-Ukraine war and his time in the Trump administration when an Afghan withdrawal was sabotaged and conflict with Iran and Syria continued.
http://youtu.be/NFngc_8RiVc
CLOSING COMMENTS
2:10:01
ON LEFTIE DEMOCRAT RO KHANNA --- Isaw him go into a cafe and i said you know he needs to to speak out against the us escalating
2:10:08
because he ran on that kind of platform so i waited for him he came out and i politely asked him some questions to
2:10:14
that effect he said to me something that i thought only
2:10:19
right-wingers during the first bush term would say " freedom isn't free this is about freedom and america is the best
2:10:25
country in the world and we've got to send in the stinger missiles "
this was the guy who was in 2018 pushing the BAN ON WEAPONS TO AZOV BATTALION AND to the AZEROTH Battalion doing so openly
2:10:36
uh tweeting about how azov was a NEO-NAZI battalion incorporated into ukrainian military he put the orange
2:10:42
revolution the color revolution in quotes like in scare quotes like he was HE WAS MOCKING THE WHOLE THING and now
2:10:48
HE'S JOINED THE WAR PARTY - THE UNIPARTY
as have so many of the other progressives AOC wearing her you know ukraine uh badge
2:10:56
during the state of the union and i guess the there was like a paper clip behind it for operation paper clip i
2:11:02
don't know but you know ILHAN OMAR has been sort of a very muted and as as one of the few critics her and
2:11:08
COERY BUSH are probably two of the only members of the squad who've put up any resistance to this
but then you have the whole AMERICA FIRST COALITION -- Nick Fuentes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Fuentes -- who are
2:11:15
saying and TUCKER CARLSON and all these figures who are saying this is NOT OUR FIGHT and they're being
2:11:21
called THE PUTIN WING OF THE GOP in washington -- [ THE INTERVENTIONIST LIBERALS / WAR PARTY ] THEY'RE FRIGHTENED OF THEM
and they're also frightened of them
2:11:27
because the democrats are going to get taken to the woodshed in the MIDTERMS and you're going to see a rise of
2:11:33
[ RIGHT WING ] POPULISM in the republican party there's NO WAY I can see the democrats holding
2:11:39
the white house with biden and kamala harris in there uh KAMALA HARRIS you know she makes
2:11:46
she makes like sarah palin look like hannah arendt i mean it's RIDICULOUS ...
2:11:51
so max by the way what did RO KHANA do after you challenged him in the interview which is up at thegrayzone.com
2:11:57
RO KHANA tweeted out this mccarthyite smear of you basically saying you were parroting RT talking points
2:12:04
he said basically that I WAS RT you were too yeah and which he then deleted but he never apologized for and he still
2:12:10
should if he has any....
i don't care if he apologizes i don't i don't accept his apology anyway i just wanted to i'm just
2:12:17
here to LIFT THE MASK you know there's been a mask mandate on
2:12:22
progressives in congress they've been wearing a PHONY VIRTUOUS MASK of being ANTI-WAR and ANTI-CAPITALIST and all the
2:12:30
stuff they say and I'M AGAINST THE PROGRESSIVE MASK MANDATE and that's what had to happen um and then
2:12:36
you see like also PHONY REPUBLICANS like maria elvira salazar getting exposed she's she's ALWAYS CLAMORING FOR WAR
2:12:43
she didn't even know what a no-fly zone was so i think we're seeing a real serious political transition in the u.s
2:12:49
and it's really because NEOLIBERALISM DID NOT WORK OUT FOR THE BASE THE REAL BASE of the republican party that had
2:12:55
always BEEN DUPED BY WEDGE ISSUES LIKE ABORTION and GAY MARRIAGE and so on they're still somewhat being duped and
2:13:01
you know but you're you're seeing just ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT RAGE and i think that
2:13:09
is one of the few things that will contribute to a kind of uh WEAKENING OF
2:13:15
of the LIBERAL INTERVENTIONIST and NEOCONSERVATIVE [CAPITALIST CORPORATE GLOBALIZATION INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN ANTI-RUSSIA ANTI-CHINA ] FORCES in washington at
2:13:20
least it's going to set the stage for another CONFRONTATION IN USA like the kind we saw during the TRUMP ERA when trump
2:13:26
effectively got rolled with the appointment of JOHN BOLTON so his appointment of john bolton his
2:13:32
appointment of john bolton yeah which speaks to mcgregor's point that you know he as he said today it's amazing to hear
2:13:38
a former trump senior official say this that uh trump was constantly undermined by the
2:13:43
PEOPLE TRUMP APPOINTED [ IDIOT CLOWN SHOES MORON ] yeah because then trump was just
2:13:48
he saw john bolton ON FOX and thought he was a good guy and you know he defended trump sometimes and
2:13:54
so trump also said like i liked having him in negotiations with
2:14:00
you know north korea or any other any other country because there was the threat of uh world war
2:14:06
three sitting across the room from them which IS JUST IDIOTIC [ THAT IS TRUMPTO THE CORE - AN IDIOT ] because [ WAR PARTY WARMONGERER ] Bolton's
2:14:12
main war was AGAINST TRUMP and for rehabilitating his own image in washington
so yeah that was on trump but anyway i
2:14:19
see another confrontation coming in washington and
2:14:25
it is really unfortunate that they're there there is THE LEFT IN THE US HAS BEEN HOLLOWED OUT [ AS HAVE THE UNIONS ]
:14:31
that they're not actually UNABLE TO POSE ANY THREAT TO THE WAR PARTY - UNIPARTY
2:14:37
in the state department and in congress [ IN THE DEEP STATE / INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ] and that they are part of it in some ways
2:14:45
all right well listen this has been a great chat thanks to everybody who has tuned in
2:14:50
this was a possibly a record for us max in terms of views over
2:14:55
5500 i think have been watching live which is great we really appreciate everyone's support
WHAT SHIT SHOW THE USA IS TODAY .... HAS BEEN FOR OVER 50 YEARS EASILY ... SINCE US ADVISORS ENTERED VIETNAM ... THE EVIL EMPIRE IS A JOKE AND IT IS GOING TO GO DOWN THE TOILET ... IT IS WHAT ALWAYS HAPPENES TO SHIT HOLES RUN BY CUNTS ....
LIKE THE UK TOTALLY LOST IT'S EMPIRE POST-WW2 EVEN THOUGH THEY TECHNICALLY WON THE WAR THEY FUCKING LOST.
THE UK IS GOING TO LOSE AGAIN THIS TIME ECONOMICALLY AND AS A RELEVANT VOICE IN THE WORLD
SO GOES AMERICA .... AFTER THE INITIAL SHOCK AND AWE IT WILL WOBBLE AND LOSE IT'S INFLUENCE TO A LARGE DEGREE .. BUT IT WILL STILL BE POWERFUL ... (AS THE UK REMAINED SO FOR A LONG TIME] DUE TO FINANCIAL WEALTH AND CONTROL OVER FINANCES GLOBALLY ] BUT IN TIME THAT SMALLER INFLUENCE WILL FAIL MORE AND MORE ... AMERICA WILL EAT IT ITSELF OUT FROM THE INSIDES .....
THE MYTH OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM , OF A MORAL GUIDE FOR THE WORLD IS BEING DESTROYED BY ITS VERY OWN IMMORALITY AND ABUSES OF POWER ..... MAY IT BE SO.
=====================
NOW REMEMBER 2014 IN UKRAINE .... WELL ANOTHER THING HAPPENED IN 2014
AUSTRALIA IS ANOTHER GULLIBLE PATSY TO THE USA IDIOCY
Dangerous Allies .... A GREAT BOOK FULL OF TRUTH N FACTS
Malcolm Fraser, Cain Roberts
We need the US for defence, but we only need defence because of the US
Australia has always been reliant on 'great and powerful friends' for its sense of national security and for direction on its foreign policy—first on the British Empire and now on the United States. Australia has actively pursued a policy of strategic dependence, believing that making a grand bargain with a powerful ally was the best policy to ensure its security and prosperity.
Dangerous Allies examines Australia's history of strategic dependence and questions the continuation of this position. It argues that international circumstances, in the world and in the Western Pacific especially, now make such a policy highly questionable. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States has also changed dramatically, making it less relevant to Australia and a less appropriate ally on which Australia should rely.
FORMER PRIME MINISTER - AND VIETNAM WAR DEFENSE MINISTER Malcolm Fraser argues that Australia should adopt a much greater degree of independence in foreign policy, and that we should no longer…
https://www.mup.com.au/books/dangerous-allies-electronic-book-text
Australia’s ‘Dangerous Allies’
A new book by former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser hopes to send Australia a wake-up call.
By Jared McKinney
July 10, 2014
https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/australias-dangerous-allies/
Review: Dangerous Allies by Malcolm Fraser Published 30 Jul 2014
By Heath Pickering
Malcolm Fraser occupies a unique place in Australian politics. A former conservative Prime Minister turned Greens sympathiser. A former Defence Minister during Australia’s involvement in Vietnam and now chief critic of the Australia-US alliance. This transformation is articulated in his new book, Dangerous Allies, where he argues that Australia’s close relationship with the United States is highly questionable in the post Cold War era. Contrary to popular belief, Fraser argues that forming alliances with “great and powerful friends” has led to “strategic dependence” and actually puts Australia in a more insecure position. Instead, he advocates for a more independent Australian foreign policy.
https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/news-item/review-dangerous-allies-by-malcolm-fraser/
AMERICA'S SELF-DESTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMING A LONG TIME ....
SIDE BARS

Rachel Maddow guest and former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul shoved his whole jackboot in his mouth recently by explaining the ways that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “worse than Hitler.” McFaul was forced to apologize and the Maddow show deleted the corresponding tweet, but neither took the opportunity to comment on why the Hitler-detesting US and NATO are currently actively supporting neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

Jimmy and The Grayzone’s Aaron Maté ( https://mate.substack.com ) discuss these latest efforts to “catapult the propaganda” and compel the US populace to get behind the cause of war.


HITLER MURDERED GERMAN JEWS, DISABLED CRIPPLES, THE MENTALLY ILL, ROMA, AND POLITICAL ENEMIES INCLUDING GERMANS ALL GERMAN SPEAKING PEOPLES ALL OVER EUROPE .... THESE PEOPLE MCFAUL ET AL ARE INSANE PSYCHOPATHS

#TheJimmyDoreShow 4 Mar 2022
US/NATO Provoked Ukraine War Say Most Experts On Russia

Maplin
2022-03-19 20:40:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Hi again,

Impressive work, I really like your analysis of "doublethink" with
regards to modern times and current events. All too true.

I'd like to have a proper exchange with you about this but it's
difficult to find the time right now, for all the right reasons. Despite
Perth finally getting its COVID wave, and virtually shutting down the
industry I usually work in, to my surprise I'm staying busy with the
crewing agency I work for. THey normally supply crew ("rent-a-roadies")
for big concerts and the like, which obviously are few and far between
now, but they've managed to adjust and supply general hands for all
kinds of stuff. Retail, COVID marshals for such events as there are,
labour for construction and more.

I mentioned I was starting up a portable recording service and that's
starting to get its first clients. If you'll indulge me, I'm pleased to
report this is starting to move in the direction I was hoping for. I've
recently risked spending some savings on better equipment, including a
device that lets me record multiple microphones or inputs in very high
quality straight to hard disk. Then I can take it away for later
processing at home. In particular I hope to get work recording church
and educational music department concerts, sermons and so on, and also
student auditions for the advanced music schools. I've managed to find
some potential clients who are interested to use me, but of course our
Omicron wave hasn't even peaked yet, so there's not much happening right
now. That's OK as I will need some time to get set up properly... more
money to spend.

I just ordered more fancy microphones, if you know anything about these
I just got a matched pair of ribbon mic's (an old technology beginning
to make a comeback, as their sonic "character" is prized in these days
of pristine digital recording, unlike when tape and other media added
sonic artefacts to the sound that we now regard as desirable), and I'm
even going to get a couple of channels of valve mic pre-amps; again this
is a desirably fashionable obsolete tech that is in demand again. This
stuff can be *very* expensive; I'm taking a gamble in buying a brand I
have to import, that I believe is a real bargain, offering the
performance of the fancy, expensive brands at fraction of the cost. But
will the clients go for it, accepting my word that it might not be by
the big name brands they know but will sound just as good?

I have an advantage in that my experience means I can build and
integrate some of my own stuff - I build my own cables out of bulk
supplies and even sell these to others. I'll need long, high-quality and
therefore expensive specialist cables for what I'm trying to do, but at
least I can make my own for much less than retail. I jagged a booking to
install audio wiring in a musician friend's home studio; I've done jobs
like this before and have a small niche market there. So where a couple
of weeks ago it looked like all my work was about to finish, I've in
fact had new doors open for me and I'm busy.

The reason this is exciting enough for me to post about it, is that this
is work I really enjoy. I do what I do because I truly love my work, and
I'd do these things as a hobby if it wasn't my livelihood.

I hope my occasional off-topic posts don't disturb the group too much;
at least I'm not a troll or a provoker. I don't use any "social media"
and I'm barely even involved in my beloved remote-control planes hobby
these days (I used to go with my father, now he's gone I haven't been
out flying since), so I don't use the general chat pages of those forums
any more. But, I like to post here when I see you around because I like
the way you see the world; I think it's important to "lift the veils"
that *any* mass-media wants to put over our eyes, and not least those of
the big churches. All these places have an agenda to push, and it's
important to filter what we read through *knowing* that it's biased one
way or another. What I don't want to do is fall into the trap of just
reading only what I agree with and surrounding myself with people who do
the same. I think it's important to try and see all sides of the issues.

Nice to see you posting again. I'll try and contribute something
worthwhile soon once I get through this busy patch.

Regards,
Maplin

PS oh by the way, I had a big success upgrading my computer. I use a 4
or 5 year old windows laptop. It was only a lower-midrange one when it
was new. It had 4GB RAM and a mechanical hard disk. I spent $59 to add
another 8GB and $128 on fitting an SSD, and wow! The RAM upgrade alone
was terrific, what a difference. Modern operating systems absolutely
need lots of RAM, 4 was just not enough for WIndows 10, and I'm sure 11
even more so. I thought Windows was just crap; maybe 5 minutes to
re-boot, over a minute to start my Thunderbird (which I use for
newsgroups like this and for email), and worst of all, a simple
right-click could take 30 to 60 seconds to respond. Now I know why...
it's simply a lack of RAM. It's because Windows must page all this stuff
in and out of virtual memory when it runs out of RAM (I don't know how
much you know about this, but it uses HDD space to swap out full RAM and
make memory available, and it's slow being limited to the speed of the
drive, plus it's a complex process). So with 12GB, huge improvement.

But then, I got around to cloning my HDD to the new SSD and fitting
that, which I did myself, thanks to some Youtube how-to videos. Easy
enough when you know how. What a difference! It was great adding the RAM
but with a solid-state drive, this old laptop has been transmogrified.
It works like a tablet now... with no moving parts access is MUCH
quicker. It now boots up from scratch in under 10 seconds (haven't timed
it properly yet). Everything loads and runs much more quickly. All those
big, complex applications that churned away forever, now just flick open
in a few seconds even for the biggest. For the money I spent, it's
incredible.

I'll need a truly new, modern machine soon enough for the audio business
but for now while I'm getting it off the ground, less than 200 bucks
to get my laptop up to scratch is a real bargain. I very highly
recommend RAM and an SSD to keep an existing machine current at a
reasonable price, never be conned into thinking you need to spend
thousands of dollars just because your computer is getting slow. (For
that matter, they don't just wear out like a car with age, it's just
poor management by the OS, and you absolutely can get them running like
they used to again, with some research and time and effort).

So the money I'd thought I'd need for a new laptop can instead go
towards yet more lovely microphones and other audio gear. It's a real
pleasure. Fortunately I already have nice speakers and amps etc to
listen to and do the work on at home, but I'll need pro headphones to
take on-site, cables and hardware and many more items, and it'll be much
more fun for me playing with those than just replacing a laptop I
already have. What fun!!
I'll post a link to a list of my equipment soon but for now I had better
get to bed before work tomorrow (Oh Ok I can't resist... the big news is
my Focusrite Clarett+ 8Pre audio interface, and Oktava mic's, the MK-012
modular system with lots of capsules to choose from inc. 4 matched
stereo pairs, a large-diaphragm main vocal capsule, a figure-8 version
of that, and best of all an ML-53-L ribbon mic with all the options,
I'll get great recordings for soloists with this).
What with *Certain Events* going on, it may be difficult to get any more
made-in-Russia products for a while, so I thought I'd better order them
now before they run out.
Henosis Sage
2022-03-20 01:42:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maplin
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Hi again,
Impressive work, I really like your analysis of "doublethink" with
regards to modern times and current events. All too true.
I'd like to have a proper exchange with you about this but it's
difficult to find the time right now, for all the right reasons. Despite
Perth finally getting its COVID wave, and virtually shutting down the
industry I usually work in, to my surprise I'm staying busy with the
crewing agency I work for. THey normally supply crew ("rent-a-roadies")
for big concerts and the like, which obviously are few and far between
now, but they've managed to adjust and supply general hands for all
kinds of stuff. Retail, COVID marshals for such events as there are,
labour for construction and more.
I mentioned I was starting up a portable recording service and that's
starting to get its first clients. If you'll indulge me, I'm pleased to
report this is starting to move in the direction I was hoping for. I've
recently risked spending some savings on better equipment, including a
device that lets me record multiple microphones or inputs in very high
quality straight to hard disk. Then I can take it away for later
processing at home. In particular I hope to get work recording church
and educational music department concerts, sermons and so on, and also
student auditions for the advanced music schools. I've managed to find
some potential clients who are interested to use me, but of course our
Omicron wave hasn't even peaked yet, so there's not much happening right
now. That's OK as I will need some time to get set up properly... more
money to spend.
I just ordered more fancy microphones, if you know anything about these
I just got a matched pair of ribbon mic's (an old technology beginning
to make a comeback, as their sonic "character" is prized in these days
of pristine digital recording, unlike when tape and other media added
sonic artefacts to the sound that we now regard as desirable), and I'm
even going to get a couple of channels of valve mic pre-amps; again this
is a desirably fashionable obsolete tech that is in demand again. This
stuff can be *very* expensive; I'm taking a gamble in buying a brand I
have to import, that I believe is a real bargain, offering the
performance of the fancy, expensive brands at fraction of the cost. But
will the clients go for it, accepting my word that it might not be by
the big name brands they know but will sound just as good?
I have an advantage in that my experience means I can build and
integrate some of my own stuff - I build my own cables out of bulk
supplies and even sell these to others. I'll need long, high-quality and
therefore expensive specialist cables for what I'm trying to do, but at
least I can make my own for much less than retail. I jagged a booking to
install audio wiring in a musician friend's home studio; I've done jobs
like this before and have a small niche market there. So where a couple
of weeks ago it looked like all my work was about to finish, I've in
fact had new doors open for me and I'm busy.
The reason this is exciting enough for me to post about it, is that this
is work I really enjoy. I do what I do because I truly love my work, and
I'd do these things as a hobby if it wasn't my livelihood.
I hope my occasional off-topic posts don't disturb the group too much;
at least I'm not a troll or a provoker. I don't use any "social media"
and I'm barely even involved in my beloved remote-control planes hobby
these days (I used to go with my father, now he's gone I haven't been
out flying since), so I don't use the general chat pages of those forums
any more. But, I like to post here when I see you around because I like
the way you see the world; I think it's important to "lift the veils"
that *any* mass-media wants to put over our eyes, and not least those of
the big churches. All these places have an agenda to push, and it's
important to filter what we read through *knowing* that it's biased one
way or another. What I don't want to do is fall into the trap of just
reading only what I agree with and surrounding myself with people who do
the same. I think it's important to try and see all sides of the issues.
Nice to see you posting again. I'll try and contribute something
worthwhile soon once I get through this busy patch.
Regards,
Maplin
PS oh by the way, I had a big success upgrading my computer. I use a 4
or 5 year old windows laptop. It was only a lower-midrange one when it
was new. It had 4GB RAM and a mechanical hard disk. I spent $59 to add
another 8GB and $128 on fitting an SSD, and wow! The RAM upgrade alone
was terrific, what a difference. Modern operating systems absolutely
need lots of RAM, 4 was just not enough for WIndows 10, and I'm sure 11
even more so. I thought Windows was just crap; maybe 5 minutes to
re-boot, over a minute to start my Thunderbird (which I use for
newsgroups like this and for email), and worst of all, a simple
right-click could take 30 to 60 seconds to respond. Now I know why...
it's simply a lack of RAM. It's because Windows must page all this stuff
in and out of virtual memory when it runs out of RAM (I don't know how
much you know about this, but it uses HDD space to swap out full RAM and
make memory available, and it's slow being limited to the speed of the
drive, plus it's a complex process). So with 12GB, huge improvement.
But then, I got around to cloning my HDD to the new SSD and fitting
that, which I did myself, thanks to some Youtube how-to videos. Easy
enough when you know how. What a difference! It was great adding the RAM
but with a solid-state drive, this old laptop has been transmogrified.
It works like a tablet now... with no moving parts access is MUCH
quicker. It now boots up from scratch in under 10 seconds (haven't timed
it properly yet). Everything loads and runs much more quickly. All those
big, complex applications that churned away forever, now just flick open
in a few seconds even for the biggest. For the money I spent, it's
incredible.
I'll need a truly new, modern machine soon enough for the audio business
but for now while I'm getting it off the ground, less than 200 bucks
to get my laptop up to scratch is a real bargain. I very highly
recommend RAM and an SSD to keep an existing machine current at a
reasonable price, never be conned into thinking you need to spend
thousands of dollars just because your computer is getting slow. (For
that matter, they don't just wear out like a car with age, it's just
poor management by the OS, and you absolutely can get them running like
they used to again, with some research and time and effort).
So the money I'd thought I'd need for a new laptop can instead go
towards yet more lovely microphones and other audio gear. It's a real
pleasure. Fortunately I already have nice speakers and amps etc to
listen to and do the work on at home, but I'll need pro headphones to
take on-site, cables and hardware and many more items, and it'll be much
more fun for me playing with those than just replacing a laptop I
already have. What fun!!
I'll post a link to a list of my equipment soon but for now I had better
get to bed before work tomorrow (Oh Ok I can't resist... the big news is
my Focusrite Clarett+ 8Pre audio interface, and Oktava mic's, the MK-012
modular system with lots of capsules to choose from inc. 4 matched
stereo pairs, a large-diaphragm main vocal capsule, a figure-8 version
of that, and best of all an ML-53-L ribbon mic with all the options,
I'll get great recordings for soloists with this).
What with *Certain Events* going on, it may be difficult to get any more
made-in-Russia products for a while, so I thought I'd better order them
now before they run out.
Hello Maplin,

thanks i enjoyed reading your good news updates. that's great, well done.

it's especially good hearing " because I truly love my work " that is a real blessing gift when that happens.
I've not been so lucky myself .... but thats the way it goes.
I hear your excitement n enthusiasm good for you!!!!
wishing the best keeps on coming. :-)

sean
Henosis Sage
2022-03-20 01:44:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Maplin
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Hi again,
Impressive work, I really like your analysis of "doublethink" with
regards to modern times and current events. All too true.
I'd like to have a proper exchange with you about this but it's
difficult to find the time right now, for all the right reasons. Despite
Perth finally getting its COVID wave, and virtually shutting down the
industry I usually work in, to my surprise I'm staying busy with the
crewing agency I work for. THey normally supply crew ("rent-a-roadies")
for big concerts and the like, which obviously are few and far between
now, but they've managed to adjust and supply general hands for all
kinds of stuff. Retail, COVID marshals for such events as there are,
labour for construction and more.
I mentioned I was starting up a portable recording service and that's
starting to get its first clients. If you'll indulge me, I'm pleased to
report this is starting to move in the direction I was hoping for. I've
recently risked spending some savings on better equipment, including a
device that lets me record multiple microphones or inputs in very high
quality straight to hard disk. Then I can take it away for later
processing at home. In particular I hope to get work recording church
and educational music department concerts, sermons and so on, and also
student auditions for the advanced music schools. I've managed to find
some potential clients who are interested to use me, but of course our
Omicron wave hasn't even peaked yet, so there's not much happening right
now. That's OK as I will need some time to get set up properly... more
money to spend.
I just ordered more fancy microphones, if you know anything about these
I just got a matched pair of ribbon mic's (an old technology beginning
to make a comeback, as their sonic "character" is prized in these days
of pristine digital recording, unlike when tape and other media added
sonic artefacts to the sound that we now regard as desirable), and I'm
even going to get a couple of channels of valve mic pre-amps; again this
is a desirably fashionable obsolete tech that is in demand again. This
stuff can be *very* expensive; I'm taking a gamble in buying a brand I
have to import, that I believe is a real bargain, offering the
performance of the fancy, expensive brands at fraction of the cost. But
will the clients go for it, accepting my word that it might not be by
the big name brands they know but will sound just as good?
I have an advantage in that my experience means I can build and
integrate some of my own stuff - I build my own cables out of bulk
supplies and even sell these to others. I'll need long, high-quality and
therefore expensive specialist cables for what I'm trying to do, but at
least I can make my own for much less than retail. I jagged a booking to
install audio wiring in a musician friend's home studio; I've done jobs
like this before and have a small niche market there. So where a couple
of weeks ago it looked like all my work was about to finish, I've in
fact had new doors open for me and I'm busy.
The reason this is exciting enough for me to post about it, is that this
is work I really enjoy. I do what I do because I truly love my work, and
I'd do these things as a hobby if it wasn't my livelihood.
I hope my occasional off-topic posts don't disturb the group too much;
at least I'm not a troll or a provoker. I don't use any "social media"
and I'm barely even involved in my beloved remote-control planes hobby
these days (I used to go with my father, now he's gone I haven't been
out flying since), so I don't use the general chat pages of those forums
any more. But, I like to post here when I see you around because I like
the way you see the world; I think it's important to "lift the veils"
that *any* mass-media wants to put over our eyes, and not least those of
the big churches. All these places have an agenda to push, and it's
important to filter what we read through *knowing* that it's biased one
way or another. What I don't want to do is fall into the trap of just
reading only what I agree with and surrounding myself with people who do
the same. I think it's important to try and see all sides of the issues.
Nice to see you posting again. I'll try and contribute something
worthwhile soon once I get through this busy patch.
Regards,
Maplin
PS oh by the way, I had a big success upgrading my computer. I use a 4
or 5 year old windows laptop. It was only a lower-midrange one when it
was new. It had 4GB RAM and a mechanical hard disk. I spent $59 to add
another 8GB and $128 on fitting an SSD, and wow! The RAM upgrade alone
was terrific, what a difference. Modern operating systems absolutely
need lots of RAM, 4 was just not enough for WIndows 10, and I'm sure 11
even more so. I thought Windows was just crap; maybe 5 minutes to
re-boot, over a minute to start my Thunderbird (which I use for
newsgroups like this and for email), and worst of all, a simple
right-click could take 30 to 60 seconds to respond. Now I know why...
it's simply a lack of RAM. It's because Windows must page all this stuff
in and out of virtual memory when it runs out of RAM (I don't know how
much you know about this, but it uses HDD space to swap out full RAM and
make memory available, and it's slow being limited to the speed of the
drive, plus it's a complex process). So with 12GB, huge improvement.
But then, I got around to cloning my HDD to the new SSD and fitting
that, which I did myself, thanks to some Youtube how-to videos. Easy
enough when you know how. What a difference! It was great adding the RAM
but with a solid-state drive, this old laptop has been transmogrified.
It works like a tablet now... with no moving parts access is MUCH
quicker. It now boots up from scratch in under 10 seconds (haven't timed
it properly yet). Everything loads and runs much more quickly. All those
big, complex applications that churned away forever, now just flick open
in a few seconds even for the biggest. For the money I spent, it's
incredible.
I'll need a truly new, modern machine soon enough for the audio business
but for now while I'm getting it off the ground, less than 200 bucks
to get my laptop up to scratch is a real bargain. I very highly
recommend RAM and an SSD to keep an existing machine current at a
reasonable price, never be conned into thinking you need to spend
thousands of dollars just because your computer is getting slow. (For
that matter, they don't just wear out like a car with age, it's just
poor management by the OS, and you absolutely can get them running like
they used to again, with some research and time and effort).
So the money I'd thought I'd need for a new laptop can instead go
towards yet more lovely microphones and other audio gear. It's a real
pleasure. Fortunately I already have nice speakers and amps etc to
listen to and do the work on at home, but I'll need pro headphones to
take on-site, cables and hardware and many more items, and it'll be much
more fun for me playing with those than just replacing a laptop I
already have. What fun!!
I'll post a link to a list of my equipment soon but for now I had better
get to bed before work tomorrow (Oh Ok I can't resist... the big news is
my Focusrite Clarett+ 8Pre audio interface, and Oktava mic's, the MK-012
modular system with lots of capsules to choose from inc. 4 matched
stereo pairs, a large-diaphragm main vocal capsule, a figure-8 version
of that, and best of all an ML-53-L ribbon mic with all the options,
I'll get great recordings for soloists with this).
What with *Certain Events* going on, it may be difficult to get any more
made-in-Russia products for a while, so I thought I'd better order them
now before they run out.
Hello Maplin,
thanks i enjoyed reading your good news updates. that's great, well done.
it's especially good hearing " because I truly love my work " that is a real blessing gift when that happens.
I've not been so lucky myself .... but thats the way it goes.
I hear your excitement n enthusiasm good for you!!!!
wishing the best keeps on coming. :-)
sean
PS so true about the computer issues w ram/ssd upgrades. good move.

also while i grasp the ideas put forward about the george orwell stuff it wasn't my writing or special insights ... see matt tabbi and others i reference
Maplin
2022-03-21 15:12:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Maplin
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Hi again,
Impressive work, I really like your analysis of "doublethink" with
regards to modern times and current events. All too true.
I'd like to have a proper exchange with you about this but it's
difficult to find the time right now, for all the right reasons. Despite
Perth finally getting its COVID wave, and virtually shutting down the
industry I usually work in, to my surprise I'm staying busy with the
crewing agency I work for. THey normally supply crew ("rent-a-roadies")
for big concerts and the like, which obviously are few and far between
now, but they've managed to adjust and supply general hands for all
kinds of stuff. Retail, COVID marshals for such events as there are,
labour for construction and more.
I mentioned I was starting up a portable recording service and that's
starting to get its first clients. If you'll indulge me, I'm pleased to
report this is starting to move in the direction I was hoping for. I've
recently risked spending some savings on better equipment, including a
device that lets me record multiple microphones or inputs in very high
quality straight to hard disk. Then I can take it away for later
processing at home. In particular I hope to get work recording church
and educational music department concerts, sermons and so on, and also
student auditions for the advanced music schools. I've managed to find
some potential clients who are interested to use me, but of course our
Omicron wave hasn't even peaked yet, so there's not much happening right
now. That's OK as I will need some time to get set up properly... more
money to spend.
I just ordered more fancy microphones, if you know anything about these
I just got a matched pair of ribbon mic's (an old technology beginning
to make a comeback, as their sonic "character" is prized in these days
of pristine digital recording, unlike when tape and other media added
sonic artefacts to the sound that we now regard as desirable), and I'm
even going to get a couple of channels of valve mic pre-amps; again this
is a desirably fashionable obsolete tech that is in demand again. This
stuff can be *very* expensive; I'm taking a gamble in buying a brand I
have to import, that I believe is a real bargain, offering the
performance of the fancy, expensive brands at fraction of the cost. But
will the clients go for it, accepting my word that it might not be by
the big name brands they know but will sound just as good?
I have an advantage in that my experience means I can build and
integrate some of my own stuff - I build my own cables out of bulk
supplies and even sell these to others. I'll need long, high-quality and
therefore expensive specialist cables for what I'm trying to do, but at
least I can make my own for much less than retail. I jagged a booking to
install audio wiring in a musician friend's home studio; I've done jobs
like this before and have a small niche market there. So where a couple
of weeks ago it looked like all my work was about to finish, I've in
fact had new doors open for me and I'm busy.
The reason this is exciting enough for me to post about it, is that this
is work I really enjoy. I do what I do because I truly love my work, and
I'd do these things as a hobby if it wasn't my livelihood.
I hope my occasional off-topic posts don't disturb the group too much;
at least I'm not a troll or a provoker. I don't use any "social media"
and I'm barely even involved in my beloved remote-control planes hobby
these days (I used to go with my father, now he's gone I haven't been
out flying since), so I don't use the general chat pages of those forums
any more. But, I like to post here when I see you around because I like
the way you see the world; I think it's important to "lift the veils"
that *any* mass-media wants to put over our eyes, and not least those of
the big churches. All these places have an agenda to push, and it's
important to filter what we read through *knowing* that it's biased one
way or another. What I don't want to do is fall into the trap of just
reading only what I agree with and surrounding myself with people who do
the same. I think it's important to try and see all sides of the issues.
Nice to see you posting again. I'll try and contribute something
worthwhile soon once I get through this busy patch.
Regards,
Maplin
PS oh by the way, I had a big success upgrading my computer. I use a 4
or 5 year old windows laptop. It was only a lower-midrange one when it
was new. It had 4GB RAM and a mechanical hard disk. I spent $59 to add
another 8GB and $128 on fitting an SSD, and wow! The RAM upgrade alone
was terrific, what a difference. Modern operating systems absolutely
need lots of RAM, 4 was just not enough for WIndows 10, and I'm sure 11
even more so. I thought Windows was just crap; maybe 5 minutes to
re-boot, over a minute to start my Thunderbird (which I use for
newsgroups like this and for email), and worst of all, a simple
right-click could take 30 to 60 seconds to respond. Now I know why...
it's simply a lack of RAM. It's because Windows must page all this stuff
in and out of virtual memory when it runs out of RAM (I don't know how
much you know about this, but it uses HDD space to swap out full RAM and
make memory available, and it's slow being limited to the speed of the
drive, plus it's a complex process). So with 12GB, huge improvement.
But then, I got around to cloning my HDD to the new SSD and fitting
that, which I did myself, thanks to some Youtube how-to videos. Easy
enough when you know how. What a difference! It was great adding the RAM
but with a solid-state drive, this old laptop has been transmogrified.
It works like a tablet now... with no moving parts access is MUCH
quicker. It now boots up from scratch in under 10 seconds (haven't timed
it properly yet). Everything loads and runs much more quickly. All those
big, complex applications that churned away forever, now just flick open
in a few seconds even for the biggest. For the money I spent, it's
incredible.
I'll need a truly new, modern machine soon enough for the audio business
but for now while I'm getting it off the ground, less than 200 bucks
to get my laptop up to scratch is a real bargain. I very highly
recommend RAM and an SSD to keep an existing machine current at a
reasonable price, never be conned into thinking you need to spend
thousands of dollars just because your computer is getting slow. (For
that matter, they don't just wear out like a car with age, it's just
poor management by the OS, and you absolutely can get them running like
they used to again, with some research and time and effort).
So the money I'd thought I'd need for a new laptop can instead go
towards yet more lovely microphones and other audio gear. It's a real
pleasure. Fortunately I already have nice speakers and amps etc to
listen to and do the work on at home, but I'll need pro headphones to
take on-site, cables and hardware and many more items, and it'll be much
more fun for me playing with those than just replacing a laptop I
already have. What fun!!
I'll post a link to a list of my equipment soon but for now I had better
get to bed before work tomorrow (Oh Ok I can't resist... the big news is
my Focusrite Clarett+ 8Pre audio interface, and Oktava mic's, the MK-012
modular system with lots of capsules to choose from inc. 4 matched
stereo pairs, a large-diaphragm main vocal capsule, a figure-8 version
of that, and best of all an ML-53-L ribbon mic with all the options,
I'll get great recordings for soloists with this).
What with *Certain Events* going on, it may be difficult to get any more
made-in-Russia products for a while, so I thought I'd better order them
now before they run out.
Hello Maplin,
thanks i enjoyed reading your good news updates. that's great, well done.
it's especially good hearing " because I truly love my work " that is a real blessing gift when that happens.
I've not been so lucky myself .... but thats the way it goes.
I hear your excitement n enthusiasm good for you!!!!
wishing the best keeps on coming. :-)
sean
Thanks so much S, I know I'm very lucky that way. I never knew I was
going to do this for a living, I really stumbled into it. I'd done a
year of computer science at university which mostly taught me I either
wasn't ready for it or that I didn't know what I was doing. Or both. At
a loose end, I had a job delivering pizzas (I was still 19). Late one
night I heard an ad on the radio for the place I ended up doing my audio
course. I went to the open day, decided to sign up, and found I really
enjoyed it. I was a bright but very slack and undisciplined student
before then, but because I enjoyed the topic, I applied myself and
succeeded, like I'd never really done at anything before. I firmly
believe that's because I enjoyed it, and that made me succeed, and the
success made me enjoy it more and so on. That was at the start of 1990
and I've done that work ever since. It surprises even me that I don't
get bored with it and if anything I enjoy it more than ever.

I don't make much, I don't own a house and I've had some pretty lean
times, but all I think about then is how much I wish I was behind a
console at some great music event somewhere doing what I do best.

What I've learned, what I believe, is that you can only be really good
at things you enjoy. You can be competent at a job and earn a fine
living at it, but to really fly and be respected at something, it can
only be because you are passionate about it and want to do the best you
are capable of, because it's reward enough in itself. And I don't see
how that can be unless it's at something you *want* to do.

It's been at some cost, and I often wonder about all the other things I
could have done and maybe succeeded at, but there must be a reason that
this is what I still want and love to do. I firmly believe that if I had
to do something else for a living, I would always find a way to "do
sound" for some gig somewhere. I really do love it. I also love to
capture sound, by which I mean making the best recordings I can,
especially music but all beautiful sounds, like speech, animal calls or
just the rain and the wind, accurately, and I love to try and make the
playback, the reproduction of that as realistic as I can. I love to try
and tune any audio system to deliver its best and then just hear it and
experience it. I get a lot out of that.

I find it astonishing the experience of accurate sound. Just as certain
smells take us back to the memories we love, I believe so do sounds.
They come with, and induce, emotions and memories and aspirations,
fears, beliefs, confusions and doubts, all the great, good and terrible
things that make the world so rich and wonderful and make us all so
lucky to be human parts of it.

Well! Couldn't help getting flowery there... yes I'm very lucky indeed.
I know other people who are passionate about what they do, and that can
be anything. Making things, writing, learning, cooking, building,
designing, even just doing the books or keeping things clean and ordered
and putting some heart into it... and some can only complain about it.
What those things are to each of us totally comes from within. If I
bitch and complain and find fault in everything, I only make my own day
worse. But if I try hard and give a damn and make an effort to do my
best, I'll feel good about it, and that will be rewarding and I'll be
happy and enjoy it. I just wish I'd figured all this out years sooner!!
Henosis Sage
2022-03-22 01:24:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maplin
Post by Henosis Sage
Post by Maplin
Post by Henosis Sage
March 13, 2022
Matt Taibbi: Orwell Was Right
From free speech to "spheres of influence" to our passion for endless war, we've become the doublethinkers 1984 predicted
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
quote " Everybody knows if Russia had troops in Mexico or Canada there would be invasions tomorrow. [Biden] sends the Secretary of State, telling Russia, “You have no right to have a sphere of influence,” after the Monroe Doctrine, after the overthrowing of democratic regimes in Latin America for the last hundred-and-some years. Come on, America, do you think people are stupid? What kind of hypocrisy can anybody stand?
That doesn’t mean that Putin is not still a gangster—of course he is. But so were the folk promoting the Monroe Doctrine that had the U.S. sphere of influence for decade after decade after decade after decade, and anybody critical of you, you would demonize. Yet here are you, right at the door of Russia, and can’t see yourself in the mirror. That’s spiritual decay right there, brother, it really is. " end quote
We’ve been trained to rage against this thinking. We even have our own borrowed Newspeak word for the offense: Whataboutism. The offender supposedly does a bait-and-switch, distracting with charges of hypocrisy without refuting the actual argument. But a Soviet giving a professionally two-faced answer to questions about Gulags by saying, “And you lynch blacks” isn’t the same as the much more serious thing West is talking about. Lying to others is shameful, but lying to ourselves and not even realizing it, that’s hardcore spiritual decay. We’re being driven faster toward the cliff-edge of this moral insanity with each new act of mass forgetting.
The ideal citizen of Orwell’s Oceania bubbled with rage a mile wide and a millimeter deep and could forget in an instant passions that may have consumed him or her for years. We just did this, with a pandemic that had the country steaming with indignation until it was quietly declared over the moment Putin rolled over Ukraine’s borders. We switched from “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” to “Putin’s price hikes” in a snap. National outrage moved a few lobes over with zero fuss, and now we hate new people; instead of “anti-vax Barbie,” we’re barring Russian and Belarussian kids from the Paralympics.
quote " It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?" – 1984
PLUS
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube also cut access to all Russian state media, because the EU sanctions also required that internet platforms delist any RT or Sputnik content, even from individuals. The statute reads, “As regards the posts made by individuals that reproduce the content of RT and Sputnik, those posts shall not be published, and if published, shall be deleted.”
Other governments across the West, from Australia to Canada, have taken similar actions. In the U.S., Google and YouTube disallowed Russian state media ads (following a request by Senator Mark Warner) and demonetized “a number of Russian channels,” including RT but also many non-Russian individuals, before proceeding to demonetize all individual Russian content creators, even the individuals opposing the invasion. Even DuckDuckGo, the speechier, more pro-privacy alternative to Google, announced it was de-ranking “sites associated with Russian disinformation.” A growing list of Westerners have seen accounts frozen for supposed parroting of Russian talking points or “abusive” commentary.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/03/13/matt-taibbi-orwell-was-right/
--------------------------
New York Times finally admits Hunter Biden laptop was authentic
" Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be sh*tting us,” the New York Post said in an editorial published on Thursday. “First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.”
“Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water,” the Post said. “And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.”
The Post added that “there’s never any shame with these 180s.” It mocked the Times for “willful ignorance” of the laptop’s authenticity and casting doubt on a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a Burisma official – only to admit the reporting was true more than a year later.
-----
NATO, US Hold Key to Resolving Ukrainian Crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry Says
12 hours ago
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday.
"The key to solving the Ukraine crisis is in the hands of the US and NATO. We hope the US and NATO, the culprits of the crisis, can reflect upon their roles in the Ukraine crisis. They should earnestly shoulder due responsibilities and take real actions to ease the situation, resolve the problem and end the conflict in Ukraine at an early date," Zhao told a briefing.
The spokesman went on to say that over the past decades, many well-known international experts have stressed that further NATO expansion against Russia would be a "fateful error" in the US policy, but Washington "turned a deaf ear to this, and was bent on advancing NATO's eastward expansion, for five times already."
"The US' decision on NATO's eastward expansion is directly linked to the Ukraine crisis now," the diplomat added.
"When it comes to civilian casualties and humanitarian situation, I wonder if you were equally concerned about the people in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestine. [...] Do not forget Serbia in 1999, or Yugoslavia. Did you show any care about civilian casualties there? [...] But the US, NATO and some western media are very hypocritical, especially as some reports smack of racism. We suggest some media focus more efforts on things that are conducive to promoting peace. They may advise the US and NATO countries not to supply ammunition or add fuel to the flame, but to sit down and build peace by talking with Europe, Russia and Ukraine," the spokesman said.
---
China hits back at NATO over Russia demand
Beijing will never forget who bombed its embassy in Belgrade, its mission to the EU said
China has dismissed calls from NATO for it not to support Russia in any way on Thursday, reminding the bloc it was its US-led forces which bombed its embassy in Belgrade during the 1999 attack on Yugoslavia.
“Chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. We need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law,” a spokesman for the Beijing’s diplomatic mission to the EU said, responding to remarks made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Branding NATO a “Cold War remnant,” the diplomat suggested the organization needed to do some self-reflection to examine if it was contributing to world peace and stability, with its expansion and military operations.
Beijing voiced support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but agreed with Moscow’s rationale, saying that NATO’s European expansion was clearly provocative. China refused to impose sanctions against Russia and criticized nations that did so, calling such measures illegal and damaging to the world economy.
An American B-2 bomber hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade at around midnight on May 7, 1999, killing three Chinese journalists and injuring some 20 people. The targeting was done by the CIA, which later claimed it wanted to provide coordinates for a nearby military depot.
President Bill Clinton apologized for the attack, calling it an accident.
--------------------
Russia’s former president explains Moscow’s conflict with the West
Dmitry Medvedev called out anti-Russian hatred and the expansion of NATO
“The frenzied Russophobia of the West, apparently, will never reach the bottom. The expansion of NATO to our borders, the economic and information war unleashed against our country on all fronts, endless threats and intimidation, the fierce persecution of our citizens abroad. All this is the reason for the extreme aggravation of the international situation that the whole world is experiencing these days,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Thursday.
The senior official also accused Western leaders of double standards and hypocrisy, calling their policies towards Moscow immoral and criminal. “We sincerely strived to have a good relationship with them,” he said.
Medvedev added that Russia has been lied to and taken advantage of for many decades. “The foundation for this rabid hatred towards Russia has been laid by the United States and its satellites throughout the entire thirty years of the new Russian state’s existence. It’s just that for a long time it was masked by the hypocritical white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who said one thing and did something completely different. Simply put, they brazenly lied to us for the sake of their own interests.”
According to the former president, the reason for the ever-growing anti-Russian sentiment is that Moscow has become a strong power in the world, capable of standing up for its interests and protecting its citizens abroad. He also believes the West wants to “make [Russia] weak and completely submissive. Better yet, tear it apart.”
We will continue to fight for the world order that suits the Russian Federation and our citizens. In which there is no place for Nazis, historical lies, or genocide. Moral strength and historical truth, as before, are on our side!”
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Kiev and its Western allies of “shocking cynicism,” saying their policies made the conflict in Ukraine inevitable. Putin said Moscow has repeatedly tried to prevent casualties by offering a peaceful solution to Kiev. The Kremlin launched its military operation on February 24.
Dmitry Medvedev served as the president of the Russian Federation from 2008 to 2012. From 2012 to 2020, he was the prime minister. Medvedev is currently the deputy chairman Russia’s Security Council.
-----
Putin on Ukraine and the West: Key takeaways from latest speech
The collective West clinging on its “crumbling dominance” has been the ultimate driver of the crisis, Russian president says
Conflict was inevitable
Launching the “special military operation” was the only option Russia had left to end the years-long bloodshed in eastern Ukraine, Putin stressed. At the same time, limiting its scope to the breakaway Donbass republics only would only push the “frontline” westwards, rather than defuse the situation, he noted.
While waging the war against the breakaway regions of Donbass, Kiev has been preparing for a broad offensive to re-capture them, Putin said, adding that “almost 14,000 civilians, including children, have been killed” in the conflict. Ukrainian authorities also sought to attack Crimea, which split from the country back in 2014 and joined Russia via a referendum.
“Encouraged by the United States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing for a scenario of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time. However, our Armed Forces have shattered these plans,” Putin said.
Kiev actively sought weapons of mass destruction
Ukrainian authorities have openly stated their goal to obtain weapons of mass destruction, namely nuclear bombs and means of their delivery, Russia’s president has said. Given the extremely hostile attitude of Kiev, such systems would have been used to target Russia once they were ready.
“There was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance and with the financial support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases,” Putin said, adding that now “frantic attempts” are underway to conceal the “traces of these secret programs.”
Ukraine established as ‘anti-Russia’
Over the past few years, under the close guidance of their Western handlers, the Kiev authorities have morphed Ukraine into “anti-Russia”, Putin suggested. The only goal of the incumbent Kiev “regime” is to drag the conflict on for as long as possible, with little regard to the fate of the civilians or destruction that ensues.
“We are seeing again and again that the Kiev regime, for which its Western masters have set the task of creating an aggressive ‘anti-Russia’, is indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine themselves,” Putin said.
“It is also obvious that the Western handlers are simply pushing the Kiev authorities to continue the bloodshed. They are supplied with more and more weaponry batches, they are provided with intelligence, they also receive other assistance, including military advisers and mercenaries.”
Kiev & West exhibit ‘shocking cynicism’
“They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics and the exasperation of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves,” Putin said, adding that Kiev had tried to blame the strike on Russia through “blatant lies.”
The attitude of “the so-called civilized world” to the missile strike turned to be “shocking in its extreme cynicism” as well, the president went on.
“The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy in Donetsk, as if nothing happened,” Putin said. “Just like they have been hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply moral degradation, complete de-humanization.”
Crumbling dominance of the West behind global turmoil
Today, the entire planet has to pay the price for the ambitions of the West, for its attempts by any means to maintain its crumbling dominance,” he said.
Concerned only with their “vested interests and super profits,” the Western elites led the world into the current situation through “years of mistakes and short-sited decisions.”
PUTIN SAID " I want ordinary Western people to hear me as well. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay from your own pockets for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat. All of that is a lie. "
Hi again,
Impressive work, I really like your analysis of "doublethink" with
regards to modern times and current events. All too true.
I'd like to have a proper exchange with you about this but it's
difficult to find the time right now, for all the right reasons. Despite
Perth finally getting its COVID wave, and virtually shutting down the
industry I usually work in, to my surprise I'm staying busy with the
crewing agency I work for. THey normally supply crew ("rent-a-roadies")
for big concerts and the like, which obviously are few and far between
now, but they've managed to adjust and supply general hands for all
kinds of stuff. Retail, COVID marshals for such events as there are,
labour for construction and more.
I mentioned I was starting up a portable recording service and that's
starting to get its first clients. If you'll indulge me, I'm pleased to
report this is starting to move in the direction I was hoping for. I've
recently risked spending some savings on better equipment, including a
device that lets me record multiple microphones or inputs in very high
quality straight to hard disk. Then I can take it away for later
processing at home. In particular I hope to get work recording church
and educational music department concerts, sermons and so on, and also
student auditions for the advanced music schools. I've managed to find
some potential clients who are interested to use me, but of course our
Omicron wave hasn't even peaked yet, so there's not much happening right
now. That's OK as I will need some time to get set up properly... more
money to spend.
I just ordered more fancy microphones, if you know anything about these
I just got a matched pair of ribbon mic's (an old technology beginning
to make a comeback, as their sonic "character" is prized in these days
of pristine digital recording, unlike when tape and other media added
sonic artefacts to the sound that we now regard as desirable), and I'm
even going to get a couple of channels of valve mic pre-amps; again this
is a desirably fashionable obsolete tech that is in demand again. This
stuff can be *very* expensive; I'm taking a gamble in buying a brand I
have to import, that I believe is a real bargain, offering the
performance of the fancy, expensive brands at fraction of the cost. But
will the clients go for it, accepting my word that it might not be by
the big name brands they know but will sound just as good?
I have an advantage in that my experience means I can build and
integrate some of my own stuff - I build my own cables out of bulk
supplies and even sell these to others. I'll need long, high-quality and
therefore expensive specialist cables for what I'm trying to do, but at
least I can make my own for much less than retail. I jagged a booking to
install audio wiring in a musician friend's home studio; I've done jobs
like this before and have a small niche market there. So where a couple
of weeks ago it looked like all my work was about to finish, I've in
fact had new doors open for me and I'm busy.
The reason this is exciting enough for me to post about it, is that this
is work I really enjoy. I do what I do because I truly love my work, and
I'd do these things as a hobby if it wasn't my livelihood.
I hope my occasional off-topic posts don't disturb the group too much;
at least I'm not a troll or a provoker. I don't use any "social media"
and I'm barely even involved in my beloved remote-control planes hobby
these days (I used to go with my father, now he's gone I haven't been
out flying since), so I don't use the general chat pages of those forums
any more. But, I like to post here when I see you around because I like
the way you see the world; I think it's important to "lift the veils"
that *any* mass-media wants to put over our eyes, and not least those of
the big churches. All these places have an agenda to push, and it's
important to filter what we read through *knowing* that it's biased one
way or another. What I don't want to do is fall into the trap of just
reading only what I agree with and surrounding myself with people who do
the same. I think it's important to try and see all sides of the issues.
Nice to see you posting again. I'll try and contribute something
worthwhile soon once I get through this busy patch.
Regards,
Maplin
PS oh by the way, I had a big success upgrading my computer. I use a 4
or 5 year old windows laptop. It was only a lower-midrange one when it
was new. It had 4GB RAM and a mechanical hard disk. I spent $59 to add
another 8GB and $128 on fitting an SSD, and wow! The RAM upgrade alone
was terrific, what a difference. Modern operating systems absolutely
need lots of RAM, 4 was just not enough for WIndows 10, and I'm sure 11
even more so. I thought Windows was just crap; maybe 5 minutes to
re-boot, over a minute to start my Thunderbird (which I use for
newsgroups like this and for email), and worst of all, a simple
right-click could take 30 to 60 seconds to respond. Now I know why...
it's simply a lack of RAM. It's because Windows must page all this stuff
in and out of virtual memory when it runs out of RAM (I don't know how
much you know about this, but it uses HDD space to swap out full RAM and
make memory available, and it's slow being limited to the speed of the
drive, plus it's a complex process). So with 12GB, huge improvement.
But then, I got around to cloning my HDD to the new SSD and fitting
that, which I did myself, thanks to some Youtube how-to videos. Easy
enough when you know how. What a difference! It was great adding the RAM
but with a solid-state drive, this old laptop has been transmogrified.
It works like a tablet now... with no moving parts access is MUCH
quicker. It now boots up from scratch in under 10 seconds (haven't timed
it properly yet). Everything loads and runs much more quickly. All those
big, complex applications that churned away forever, now just flick open
in a few seconds even for the biggest. For the money I spent, it's
incredible.
I'll need a truly new, modern machine soon enough for the audio business
but for now while I'm getting it off the ground, less than 200 bucks
to get my laptop up to scratch is a real bargain. I very highly
recommend RAM and an SSD to keep an existing machine current at a
reasonable price, never be conned into thinking you need to spend
thousands of dollars just because your computer is getting slow. (For
that matter, they don't just wear out like a car with age, it's just
poor management by the OS, and you absolutely can get them running like
they used to again, with some research and time and effort).
So the money I'd thought I'd need for a new laptop can instead go
towards yet more lovely microphones and other audio gear. It's a real
pleasure. Fortunately I already have nice speakers and amps etc to
listen to and do the work on at home, but I'll need pro headphones to
take on-site, cables and hardware and many more items, and it'll be much
more fun for me playing with those than just replacing a laptop I
already have. What fun!!
I'll post a link to a list of my equipment soon but for now I had better
get to bed before work tomorrow (Oh Ok I can't resist... the big news is
my Focusrite Clarett+ 8Pre audio interface, and Oktava mic's, the MK-012
modular system with lots of capsules to choose from inc. 4 matched
stereo pairs, a large-diaphragm main vocal capsule, a figure-8 version
of that, and best of all an ML-53-L ribbon mic with all the options,
I'll get great recordings for soloists with this).
What with *Certain Events* going on, it may be difficult to get any more
made-in-Russia products for a while, so I thought I'd better order them
now before they run out.
Hello Maplin,
thanks i enjoyed reading your good news updates. that's great, well done.
it's especially good hearing " because I truly love my work " that is a real blessing gift when that happens.
I've not been so lucky myself .... but thats the way it goes.
I hear your excitement n enthusiasm good for you!!!!
wishing the best keeps on coming. :-)
sean
Thanks so much S, I know I'm very lucky that way. I never knew I was
going to do this for a living, I really stumbled into it. I'd done a
year of computer science at university which mostly taught me I either
wasn't ready for it or that I didn't know what I was doing. Or both. At
a loose end, I had a job delivering pizzas (I was still 19). Late one
night I heard an ad on the radio for the place I ended up doing my audio
course. I went to the open day, decided to sign up, and found I really
enjoyed it. I was a bright but very slack and undisciplined student
before then, but because I enjoyed the topic, I applied myself and
succeeded, like I'd never really done at anything before. I firmly
believe that's because I enjoyed it, and that made me succeed, and the
success made me enjoy it more and so on. That was at the start of 1990
and I've done that work ever since. It surprises even me that I don't
get bored with it and if anything I enjoy it more than ever.
I don't make much, I don't own a house and I've had some pretty lean
times, but all I think about then is how much I wish I was behind a
console at some great music event somewhere doing what I do best.
What I've learned, what I believe, is that you can only be really good
at things you enjoy. You can be competent at a job and earn a fine
living at it, but to really fly and be respected at something, it can
only be because you are passionate about it and want to do the best you
are capable of, because it's reward enough in itself. And I don't see
how that can be unless it's at something you *want* to do.
It's been at some cost, and I often wonder about all the other things I
could have done and maybe succeeded at, but there must be a reason that
this is what I still want and love to do. I firmly believe that if I had
to do something else for a living, I would always find a way to "do
sound" for some gig somewhere. I really do love it. I also love to
capture sound, by which I mean making the best recordings I can,
especially music but all beautiful sounds, like speech, animal calls or
just the rain and the wind, accurately, and I love to try and make the
playback, the reproduction of that as realistic as I can. I love to try
and tune any audio system to deliver its best and then just hear it and
experience it. I get a lot out of that.
I find it astonishing the experience of accurate sound. Just as certain
smells take us back to the memories we love, I believe so do sounds.
They come with, and induce, emotions and memories and aspirations,
fears, beliefs, confusions and doubts, all the great, good and terrible
things that make the world so rich and wonderful and make us all so
lucky to be human parts of it.
Well! Couldn't help getting flowery there... yes I'm very lucky indeed.
I know other people who are passionate about what they do, and that can
be anything. Making things, writing, learning, cooking, building,
designing, even just doing the books or keeping things clean and ordered
and putting some heart into it... and some can only complain about it.
What those things are to each of us totally comes from within. If I
bitch and complain and find fault in everything, I only make my own day
worse. But if I try hard and give a damn and make an effort to do my
best, I'll feel good about it, and that will be rewarding and I'll be
happy and enjoy it. I just wish I'd figured all this out years sooner!!
well said ... I bitch and moan and can complain and find fault in everything too often ... wasn't always like that. now a grumpy [frustrated] old man it seems. oh well the world needs balance right?
Loading...